IIRC, Rattle did a cycle with them recently, but I'm really not
interested in the VPO playing anything like HIP, and just want to hear
the orchestra being itself, even if that isn't cutting edge. Lenny got
it right in a few of his- I've got most of those on Laserdisc still.
What VPO cycle represents them at their best, sonority-wise,
neverminding the abilities of the conductor?
Bernstein and Bohm, IMO.
I'd put in a vote for Schmidt-Isserstedt. I think it gets forgotten as a
cycle.
Stan Punzel
My favorite 9th.
Wrong. I remember it as a cycle (having bought it LP after LP) :)
Agreed. I recently did a listening comparison of all of my LvB cycles
and Schmidt-Isserstedt unexpectedly (to me) ranked near the top.
Dil.
> What VPO cycle represents them at their best, sonority-wise,
> neverminding the abilities of the conductor?
Another vote for Bernstein.
Monteux recorded 1, 3, 6, & 8 with the VPO, but I don't feel it
represents the conductor, orchestra, or the Decca engineers at their
best. However, it seems to be rated very highly by enough people to
be worth mentioning:
http://www.amazon.com/Beethoven-Symphonies-Nos-Ludwig-van/dp/B00000422R
Böhm's was my first set (on International Preview Society Lps), and
I'm still imprinted on much of it. Certainly one of the most
beautiful sounding Beethoven sets. It's available on separate
Australian Eloquence CDs now, though I wish Univeral would get around
to issuing it in a box.
http://preview.tinyurl.com/yezwcy4
Dave Cook
You're very cruel!
I love this cycle also. The VPO sounds leaner than usual and to me,
that's a benefit in this music. Interpretation is refreshingly
straightforward.
> I'd put in a vote for Schmidt-Isserstedt.
Ditto, but good luck finding a CD copy at a reasonable price.
Bill
I noticed in the Decca 2009 catalog that it was not in there.
I'm glad i bought it when I could.
Stan Punzel
The VPO/B�hm set of the symphonies was issued on CD by DG in three sets:
Nos. 1-2, 4-5 on DG 439 682-2; nos. 3 and 9, with three overtures, on DG
437 368-2; and nos. 6-8 on DG 437 926-2.
I should think that both the "Schmitty" and B�hm sets should still be
easily obtainable... --E.A.C.
Stan Punzel <rapu...@spiritone.com> wrote:
--
hrabanus
But did you try to find it? (The Schmidt-Isserstedt set I mean.)
I suppose not.
I tried, and did not find it available.
Gerard <ghen_nospam_driksen˛@hotmail.com> wrote:
> But did you try to find it? (The Schmidt-Isserstedt set I mean.)
> I suppose not.
> I tried, and did not find it available.
--
hrabanus