I can hardly believe it, but I am almost tempted to agree with Herman:
- The sensitivity of men to small matters, and their indifference to great ones, indicates a strange inversion.
Blaise Pascal
But in the 21st-c., has our awe of historical composers and our desire (obsession?) to discover their 'real' intent blinded us to something?:
- Every tradition grows ever more venerable the more remote its origin, the more confused that origin is. The reverence due to it increases from generation to generation. The tradition finally becomes holy and inspires awe.
Nietzsche
Were historical composers regarded as high priests by contemporary conductors or were their relationships almost collegial?
Didn't Toscanini go to Debussy with 'suggestions' as to how to 'improve' LA MER?
Did conductors 'worship' the composers of their time (as we now do) or did they view contemporary composers more open to revisions?
And were composers more receptive to different approaches offered by conductors and viewed conductors as almost collaborative partners?