On Sunday, October 24, 2021 at 10:52:58 PM UTC-4, Herman wrote:
> Right from the start Liu's performances in the competition said: winner. Not necessarily because of the musicality he brought to the table in substantially better ways than Sorita or Gadjiev.
> He didn't. Looks and demeanor had a lot to do with it, too.
So the esteemed judges, most who were pianists, and some who took top prizes in the past decided they liked his looks and demeanor, even though his musicality was not much better than those who came in second.
How do you know his looks had “a lot to do with it”?? Where could you possibly deduce this except from your own inner universe? The average age of the judges looked to be around 70-75. Their votes would be swayed by his looks?
My take on it is that Bruce Liu, probably with the help of his teacher knew better than the others how to capitalize on his strengths and not showcase his weaknesses. I came away from this competition with the feeling that simplicity is a vastly underrated virtue among the artsy crowd. Compare Sorita’s Rondo a la Mazur to Liu’s. Sorita’s in comparison was heavy handed, with too many unnecessary punctuations. It turned a simple, charming and glittery virtuoso showpiece into something that completely missed the point. Bruce got the point and hit it squarely in the bull’s-eye. That’s part of the reason he won first prize IMO. If Bruce had chosen the Polonaise-Fantasy he might not have been ready for the interpretive difficulties, so he wisely chose the Andante Spianato and Grand Polonaise which was a perfect choice for his gifts. I thought his Mazurkas were excellent. That is far more likely the reason that he took first prize then some future cover on Gentlemans Quarterly magazine.