Have fun Don, and know that you'll be missed every day,
Dave Royko
Hopefully the move will be good for Don's health and our RMCR
community, if he has time for posting. I don't relish the idea of
WFMT sans Don, but I'll hold my breath in hopes I don't notice it too
much.
MW in Chicago
Don, thanks for the fine work including the Stokowski Legacy, and that
contagious chuckle.
Regards,
Joe
Thank you for introducing me to Koussevitzky, Ignaz Friedman,
Percy Grainger, Mengelberg's "Les Preludes", etc., etc. on WFMT.
Also, thank you for all of your advice regarding record collecting and
for revealing the record "codes" ie: matrix and take numbers, and for
your help with proper recording equalization. Thanks, too, for
introducing me to our late friend, Fred Heft. Have a wonderful
retirement! Hope to see you soon. Best, Gary
Don's huge bank of knowledge, energizing insights, and admirable
ability to synthesize information into the stuff of informative,
educational and entertaining broadcasting are simply too important to
disappear from the scene. It's my sincere hope that the powers that be
at WFMT (and elsewhere) will offer him a platform to continue his
activities, and that the world of digital media will be enriched by
his presence and mastery of the subject matter of concert music and
great recordings for many decades to come.
Bravo, Bravissimo Don Tait, and cue the tusch!!!
On Oct 19, 10:45 am, David Royko <davidro...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Roger
EK: Oh, yes we do.
Who knows what I'll do next? Bill Anderson is prodding me. We'll
see.
Thanks again, everyone.
Don Tait
(big edit)
> I
> asked him,if they might be interested in someone doing a show,say on a
> weekend afternoon, of 78s,and older vinyl.Especially since they had
> just dropped The Met.
> Roger
A collector's program would be great of course, and good luck (I did
them for decades). But they just dropped the Met broadcasts? This anti-
vocal music, anti-opera prejudice on the part of so-called classical
music station managers and programmers is stupid, stupid, stupid. It
is born of the herd instinct: analysts (consultants) decided that
listeners don't like vocal music, and because most people running the
few remaining classical stations are frightened and have no
convictions of their own, they do what the consultants preach to them.
I can testify that the most popular music on WFMT is vocal, especially
opera. During our fund-raisers nothing makes the phones go crazy like
vocal music.
The trashy character of the current Met broadcasts under Peter Gelb
might make them worthy of cancellation for other reasons, of course.
Don Tait
Jeff from WI
> The trashy character of the current Met broadcasts under Peter Gelb
> might make them worthy of cancellation for other reasons, of course.
I stopped listening to them after he took over. (Actually, I had been
getting disenchanted with the format changes after Chevron Texaco dumped
them, Margaret Juntwait took over, Peter Allen was reduced to doing asinine
and irrelevant interstitials, etc.) In what way has it become "trashy"?
Could it be the dumbing-down I was expecting to happen?
--
Matthew B. Tepper: WWW, science fiction, classical music, ducks!
My personal home page -- http://home.earthlink.net/~oy/index.html
My main music page --- http://home.earthlink.net/~oy/berlioz.html
To write to me, do for my address what Androcles did for the lion
War is Peace. ** Freedom is Slavery. ** It's all Napster's fault!
Don,
Best wishes on your retirement. Thanks for all of your input around
here. Hope you continue to post on RMCR!
--
-----------
Aloha and Mahalo,
Eric Nagamine
http://home.hawaii.rr.com/mahlerb/broadcaststartpage.html
When I think of WFMT the names that come to mind are Bernie and Rita
Jacobs, Mike Nichols, Norm Pellegrini, Studs Terkel, Ray Nordstrand
and Don Tait. Thank you Don, for the many years of enjoyment and
information you have brought your listeners. You will be greatly
missed.
-Gene Halaburt
Thank you, Jeff.
Don
(snip)
> Don,
>
> Best wishes on your retirement. Thanks for all of your input around
> here. Hope you continue to post on RMCR!
Thanks, Eric. Yes, now that I'll have my time to myself I expect to
go on participating, perhaps even more if reasons arise.
Don T.
Yes. I should say first that the season before last I became so fed
up that I stopped listening; they might have made adjustments since
then. But dumbing-down was what had happened. The synopses of the acts
had been turned into cute dialogues between Margaret Juntwait and an
invited guest or "authority." Instead of just telling the story of
what was coming up, it became two voices alternating sentences and cit-
chat -- which was very distracting from concentrating on the
description of the plot. That is stupid radio and bad for
understanding of the operas. Also, almost all the intermissions I
heard were superficial live backstage interviews of the breathless
"oh, isn't this exciting?!" variety. Most singers resting between acts
cannot be expected to be at their most relaxed under such
circumstances, anyway. The former intermission features were gone,
except that they might have retained the quiz since it was so popular
-- my patience was never long enough to stick around to hear whether
they'd done so.
Don Tait
Frankly, Don, I have to disagree with you about the renovations which
have taken place on the Met broadcasts. I have studiously avoided them
for decades. Nothing so silly as opera on the radio. Opera on
television, now that's something quite different, but very rare on
this side of the Atlantic.
The entire broadcast has been rethought and I approve of the
rethinking going on. Helps that I know one of the participants
personally and she's one very bright lady with lots of ideas and even
more energy.
The plots? I was always unable to follow those. If I am interested, I
have Milton Cross's Opera summaries. After that I just want to know
who's singing and who's conducting.
The quiz? Well, that was always the stagiest part of the old Met
broadcasts, so I don't miss that at all.
As for Peter Gelb. Well, he has scored a complete triumph with the
telecasting of the Met broadcasts through movie theatres throughout
the world. The theatre sells out in Kingston, Ontario, weeks before
each closed circuit telecast, so he must be doing something right.
Feeding an obvious need. I have NO love for Mr. Gelb, who made my work
on the GPE phenomenally difficult and ended up doing a disservice to
all the Sony artists as a result. But I am forced to give credit where
credit is due. He has done great work at the Met so far.
Despite the fervent hopes of Matthew B. Tepper that he would fall on
his face. Gelb never falls on his face; he just gains more and more
power and credibility. A power to be reckoned with, I would say, if a
disagreeable one as well. Clearly it is he who has brought in this new
team at the Met radio broadcast network. It may disturb old-timers,
but I wager he's looking to expand his audience considerably. Perhaps
among all those people frustrated by not being able to get into the
theatres?
TD
The current Met radio presentation methodology? It's seemingly
inspired more by "All Things Considered" than by the informational
needs of opera lovers. It's been glitzed merely to accommodate 'modern
listeners' with nano-second attention spans, who will never tune in
for a broadcast opera in the first place...
Best wishes too, from those of us who aren't in Chicagee, and have never
heard ya.
Ray (Dawg) Hall, Taree
I remember listening to Don on WNIB (long defunct) in Chicago even
before the WFMT days! Very happy memories.
All the best,
Tom Baker
Princeton Junction, NJ
On Oct 19, 11:45 am, David Royko <davidro...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hope to hear from you on this and other places you may lurk (reviews
maybe)
May you enjoy good health and a happy retirement...
All the best,
Larry in SF