http://groups.google.com/group/Symphonyshare
I have no affiliation other than being a pleased member.
Kevin
How is the juvenile tyrant getting on? No entertaining contretemps?
bl
"You must be signed in and a member of this group to view its content."
the sign of a fraud.
> "You must be signed in and a member of this group to view its content."
>
> the sign of a fraud.
How so??
No. Just fine music for those more interested in sharing than
squabbling.
Regards,
Eric Grunin
www.grunin.com/eroica
I just signed in and viewed the latest posts without any problem.
--
Matthew B. Tepper: WWW, science fiction, classical music, ducks!
My personal home page -- http://home.earthlink.net/~oy/index.html
My main music page --- http://home.earthlink.net/~oy/berlioz.html
To write to me, do for my address what Androcles did for the lion
Opinions expressed here are not necessarily those of my employers
I was approved,and then stayed away for a few weeks.When I came back,I
coudn't get in.It said I wasn't a member.
Roger
I think if you contact the moderator (or owner or whatever you call
him) he'll straighten things out. I had some similar problems getting
registered, probably due to my own incompetence, which he easily
resolved.
Since then, the group has been a very pleasant experience, remarkably
devoid of the typical yahoos and blowhards.
JM
From time to time you need to log in anew - find the button that says
"Log On to Google Groups", enter your password and you should be taken
to the Symphonyshare home page. I need to do this every few weeks
myself.
> I think if you contact the moderator (or owner or whatever you call him)
> he'll straighten things out. I had some similar problems getting
> registered, probably due to my own incompetence, which he easily resolved.
>
> Since then, the group has been a very pleasant experience, remarkably
> devoid of the typical yahoos and blowhards.
I haven't posted yet.
Heh. Me neither! I am a shameless lurking downloader there.
JM
ive posted twice one was accepted the other disappeared
There is, happily, no argumentative name-calling and most seem eager
to help with the technical aspects of uploading.
I've put a large handful of items of marginal interest up there. A
few people have been very appreciative and write back giving their
opinions and actually taking the time to say 'thank you.' But, like
many such groups, most just sit there with a handful of 'Gimme' and a
mouthful of 'Much obliged.'
I must say I miss the days when you had to actually have contact with
another person to trade music. You discussed your likes and dislikes
and the merits of the performances traded.
This, they tell me, is progress.
ray
Ray, just try to imagine a father with two young kids and a wife who
just got laid off after ten years at her job, and how grateful he is
for being able to get something for nothing in the brief amount of
free time that he does have. That's my story, and I'm stuck with it
for the time being.
Unknown. I haven't seen any posts from you yet. Just lots of good
people posting great recordings without name calling. Nice.
Kevin
You don't know your owner? BTW, you could modify your words above to
say: "Mostly lots of otherwise good people posting recordings they don't
have distribution rights to, without name calling. Nice?"
bl
I would say that is, for the simple reason that more people have more
access to more good music.
No one is forced to participate. Those who would rather exchange
recordings the old way are free to continue doing so. Those who wish
to make comments about the performances are still free to do so. I'm
not sure what the problem is, except perhaps that we lose the sense of
exclusivity we used to have in owning rare recordings.
JM
Aren't radio broadcasts free trade? Operashare is the group where
people post their LP and tape transfers which always impressed me as
being rather questionable, at least in the United States. It was my
understanding that radio broadcasts, as long as they are not sold, can
be shared freely.
It seems to me that they should be. However, it appears that the 'fair
use' law (doctrine, regulation, whatever it is) in the U.S. permits
copying the broadcast, but not the distribution of that copy; for profit
or not. When the EU implements its 95 year recording copyright change,
which Robert-bis says will be retroactive, many more
copies-of-broadcasts will become, ah, contraband.
I think broadcasts of live performances are not within the aegis of the
RIAA, so I wonder what agency is supposed to enforce the restrictions.
Whatever it is, I don't trust the various governments to continue to
ignore violations. I don't trust the governments in much of anything.
bl
Well spoke, Bob....well spoke indeed.
Ray
> I think broadcasts of live performances are not within the aegis of the
> RIAA, so I wonder what agency is supposed to enforce the restrictions.
> Whatever it is, I don't trust the various governments to continue to
> ignore violations. I don't trust the governments in much of anything.
I don't trust the government(s) much, but I trust Big Business even less.
I don't have an owner, so I've no idea who you think you're referring
to. From what I've seen of your posts, however, I think you're the
juvenile. Everyone on Symphonyshare behaves like adults.
Kevin
Bob Harper
Who was easier to expel from his job, Jimmy Carter or Ken Lay?