"gggg gggg" wrote in message
news:a98a62d8-dbf8-4613...@googlegroups.com...
>glorious wash of sound, but Technicolor, 3->D and I-Max. The fidelity is
>spectacular and the final minutes are emotionally draining. While we all
>fantasize over how we would improve a performance if only we were in
>charge, in this instance I simply >cannot imagine a more effective
>rendition. And I'll give critics who still drench the Munch studio
>recording in superlatives the benefit of the doubt that they've simply
>never heard this live one. It's one of those >astounding, soul-shaking
>experiences after which no other recording ever sounds quite the same. Beg,
>borrow or steal a copy (but not mine, please).
>
http://www.classicalnotes.net/classics4/daphnis.html
I have both RCA CDs of Munch/BSO, and I bought the LIVE recording
recommended above. I strongly disagree with the recommendation. It is copy
of a live radio broadcast and has all the limitations you might expect
(limited dynamic range, limited frequency response, muzzy bass). I used to
tape FM broadcasts of live BSO performances when I was young, and I concur
that Munch could be more electrifying in front of an audience than in his
commercial recordings. I don't find that the case here. Stick with the
1961 performance (by the way, "barely distinguishable" is not at all true.
The later performance captures the weight of a full orchestra in a way that
the earlier recording doesn't approach.)
I pretty much disagree with almost everything in the long paragraph quoted
above by gggg gggg.