Jim Stevenson
In article <7nhoti$72m$1...@news6.svr.pol.co.uk>, "John Carter"
> Strong's time is coming thanks to Klaus Heyman and the
> Naxos/Marco Polo group who are courageously giving these composers of this
> era a hearing.
I didn't know the Strong Sym #2 before I bought the Naxos recording of it,
but I certainly enjoy it a great deal. Greatest thing I've ever heard? No.
Worth acquiring? Yes -- even at full price. To get it at Naxos's discount
price is a real bargain. Plus, Naxos should be encouraged in its efforts to
bring out more items of unjustly neglected repertoire.
Happy listening.
Clifford Ando ca...@usc.edu
Classics Department phone: (213) 740-3683
University of Southern California fax: (213) 740-7360
Los Angeles, CA 90089-0352
Given that one of the main figures in the musical establishment in the
1950s was Howard Hanson, director of Eastman school of Music until
1964, and one of the pre-eminent late Romantic American composures,
I'm not quite sure what `establishment' you believe is responsible
for ignoring others of his ilk. There wasn't any ghastly conspiracy -
American audiences simply stopped listening to any near-contemporary
music (did they ever start?) regardless of what it sounded like.
Neill Reid - i...@deimos.caltech.edu
>My recommendation is that you buy the
>Strong "Sintram" now available on Naxos for the fact that for a very low
>price you develop your own opinion. I love the symphony and have know it
>for 30 years. I heard it first when Karl Kreuger issued it on his Society
>for the Preservation of the American Musical Heritage subscription lp in
>the 1960's. Strong's time is coming thanks to Klaus Heyman and the
>Naxos/Marco Polo group who are courageously giving these composers of this
>era a hearing.
>
> Neill Reid - i...@deimos.caltech.edu
Neill, I agree in part. But Hanson was on a quest and had at his command
the entire resources of the Eastman School of Music and represented that
"alternate" establishment. But even today the main "establishment" still
holds sway. In this newsgroup alone, how often we hear that same cant that
"the only music worth hearing are the works of the great masters?" And
isn't it true that those responsible for programming concerts and
selecting repertoire for recordings were and are interested mainly in the
bottom line to which they (in the past, at least) feared those "old
fashioned" late Romantic composers would not much contribute?
I believe that with the effort of modern orchestral conductors to "teach"
the listening public to hear "modern music" (Michael Guiland made this a
point of effort when music director of the Cincinnati S.O.,) this same
effort was never applied to composers such as John Alden Carpenter, George
Chadwick, Henry Hadley, George Templeton Strong... and a plethora of their
contemporaries.
J Stevenson
The good folks at Bridge Records obviously didn't want to be seen as overtly
advertising on the newsgroup -- which is indeed good of them -- as they
refrained from mentioning that they're selling the Krueger/RPO CDs and
others for $9.99 plus S&H from their website. (At everycd.com, the Krueger
CD is $12.50; at amazon.com, $15.49.) Solid!
And no, I don't have any commercial, financial or otherwise connection with
Bridge -- but they're getting me as a customer!
Happy listening.
They will have me for a customer too, but I can't help but wonder why
their first 2 releases were of items that were already available. I
want *new* stuff!
Steve
>James K. Stevenson <jkst...@seidata.com> wrote in message
>news:jksteven-260...@cvx-dial59.seidata.com...
>
>> Strong's time is coming thanks to Klaus Heyman and the
>> Naxos/Marco Polo group who are courageously giving these composers of this
>> era a hearing.
>
>I didn't know the Strong Sym #2 before I bought the Naxos recording of it,
>but I certainly enjoy it a great deal. Greatest thing I've ever heard? No.
>Worth acquiring? Yes -- even at full price. To get it at Naxos's discount
>price is a real bargain. Plus, Naxos should be encouraged in its efforts to
>bring out more items of unjustly neglected repertoire.
For three movements I thought the Strong 2nd was the great lost
symphony, but the finale falls apart a bit. Very worth hearing
nonetheless.
Marc Perman
The answer is: This is the material that we were initially given access to.
The rest of the Krueger recordings were opened up to us only two months ago.
Without tooting our horn too much, however, I'd like to invite comparison
between the material issued by the LOC and our first two releases. To me, it
sounds like 'new stuff'. Anyway, stay tuned--new stuff to follow, shortly.
-ds
> Does anyone know if there will be others in the series
I talked just yesterday (!) to the conductor Adriano, who lives in
Zurich, Switzerland. He told me that volume two is already recorded, and
should be released later this year (Naxos 8.559048, including Die Nacht
(four little symphonic poems), and the symphonic poem Le Roi Arthur).
Adriano will record the complete orchestral output of Templeton Strong
(five or six CDs). His next plans are *amazingly* interesting. Stay
tuned.
LS
> Bridge Records has begun the restoration and release on CD of Karl Krueger's
> RPO recordings. Thus far the MacDowell tone poems have been issued, as
well as
> the Amy Beach Symphony coupled with William Grant Still's Afro American
> Symphony. Upcoming releases in this series will be devoted to MacDowell,
> Foote, G. T. Strong, Arthur Farwell, Henry Gilbert,
> Victor Herbert, J.A. Carpenter, J.K. Paine and others. Please see
> www.bridgerecords.com for info and mp3 samples.
This is indeed a revelation! Thank you for this information!
J Stevenson
>>Hanson was on a quest and had at his command
> > the entire resources of the Eastman School of Music and represented that
> > "alternate" establishment. But even today the main "establishment" still
> > holds sway. In this newsgroup alone, how often we hear that same cant that
> > "the only music worth hearing are the works of the great masters?" And
> > isn't it true that those responsible for programming concerts and
> > selecting repertoire for recordings were and are interested mainly in the
> > bottom line to which they (in the past, at least) feared those "old
> > fashioned" late Romantic composers would not much contribute?
> >
> > I believe that with the effort of modern orchestral conductors to "teach"
> > the listening public to hear "modern music" (Michael Guiland made this a
> > point of effort when music director of the Cincinnati S.O.,) this same
> > effort was never applied to composers such as John Alden Carpenter, George
> > Chadwick, Henry Hadley, George Templeton Strong... and a plethora of their
> > contemporaries.
> >
> > J Stevenson
> Thank you for the information and advice. American composers have not had
> maybe the same degree of exposure over here.Piston, Harris Cowell but not
> those mentioned.The Naxos American Classics thus represents a challenge
> which we ought to face.I think we tend to think of most American composers
> are something likeCopland or Gershwin which is obviously far from the
> case.What other American originals should we look out for?
> John Carter Barsoom
John,
Here is my general list of the forgotten generation of American composers.
Of course some will say I left a certain composer out, and I will gladly
add any I have forgotten... but this is a list of composers whom I feel
deserve a hearing, as least a greater exposure than they have had in this
century. (And to be fair, in the last several years some have been getting
some of that exposure ... George Chadwick, finally, for one.)
BRISTOW, GEORGE (American: 1825-1998)
BUCK, DUDLEY (American: 1839-1906)
CADMAN, CHARLES WAKEFIELD (American:1881-1946)
CARPENTER, JOHN ALDEN (American: 1876-1951)
CHADWICK, GEORGE W. (American: 1854-1931)
COERNE, LOUIS ADOLPHE (American: 1870-1922)
CONVERSE, FREDRICK (American: 1871-1940)
COWELL, HENRY (American:1897-1965)
DAMROSCH, WALTER (American: 1862-1950)
DUBENSKY, ARCADY (American: 1890-1966)
FARWELL, ARTHUR (American: 1872-1952)
FOOTE, ARTHUR (American: 1853-1937)
FRY, WILLIAM HENRY (American: 1813-1864)
GILBERT, HENRY F.(American: 1868-1928)
GILLIS, DON (American: 1912-?)r
GOLDMARK, RUBIN (American: 1872-1936)
GRUENBERG, LOUIS (Polish-American: 1884-1964)
GUION, DAVID (American: 1892-1981)
HAUBIEL, CHARLES (American:
HILL, EDWARD BURLINGAME (American: 1872-1960)
KELLY, EDGAR STILLMAN (American: 1857-1944)
LOEFFLER, CHARLES MARTIN (American: 1861-1935)
MASON, DANIEL GREGORY (American: 1873-1953)
MOORE, DOUGLAS (American: 1893-1969)
NEVIN, ETHELBERT (American: 1862-1901)
PAINE, JOHN KNOWLES (American: 1839-1906)
PARKER, HORATIO (American: 1863-1919)
STRONG, GEORGE TEMPLETON (American: 1856-1948)
TAYLOR, DEEMS (American:
THOMPSON, RANDALL (American: 1899-1984)
This is not to say these composers have not been recorded: they have. But
in such a meager way that merely tantalizes the "taste buds" as it were.
Fortunately for this, or I and many other music lovers never would have
discovered how enjoyable the music is that these composers have produced.
I personally would love to see a renaissance of American musical awareness
such as has occurred in the UK with the rediscovery of such composers as
Stanford, Parry, MaCunn, MacKenzie, McEwen, Dyson, Moeran, Holbrooke, and
others, as these composers were, of course, the contemporaries of most of
those in my list above.
Jim Stevenson