- Chromatic Fantasy and Fugue in D minor, BWV 903
- WTC I, Prelude and Fugue No. 5, BWV 850
- Adagio from Concerto in D minor (after B. Marcello), BWV 973
- Fantasia in A minor, BWV 922
- Toccata in D Major, BWV 912
- Chorale Prelude, "Ich ruf zu dir, Herr Jesu Christ", BWV 639
The Naxos (restored by Stuart Rosenthal and produced by Marina and
Victor Ledin)
contains only the WTC I. Fans of Fischer's Bach will be happy to have
the additional pieces included by Pearl, so I definitely give the edge
to Pearl on content.
Pearl's notes are by Teri Noel Towe and are more extensive than Naxos' ,
which are provided by Farhan Malik, a well known pianophile in this
newsgroup. Farhan concentrates more on Fischer the artist (although he
includes technical discussion with pointers to some of the Preludes and
Fugues to illustrate his point), whereas TNT includes more discussion on
Fischer's interpretation of the particular works on the Pearl set.
Now for the sound comparison: The first thing you'll notice is that the
Pearl has significantly more surface noise, in the form of a uniform
curtain of swish from the 78s.
The payoff is good piano tone, better overall ambience (you hear more
"air" about the piano) and extended frequency range, especially in the
upper frequencies.
Naxos' transfers are extremely clean, but definitely not brutally
overfiltered in the way the original EMI set was (where the piano
sounded as if it was covered by tin foil).
While the piano tone is less bright and very slightly more muffled than
in the Pearl transfer, the cleaner sound may prove to be more attractive
to the average listener.
This was confirmed time and again by listening to about half of the
preludes and fugues in sequence (prelude after prelude and fugue after
fugue) from both transfers, with perhaps the 2nd prelude and fugue
providing the most vivid difference.
Bottom line: if surface noise bothers you, go for Naxos and you will be
very happy.
If you would like slightly better piano tone and are willing to put up
with significant surface noise and spend about 2 to 2.5 times as much,
go for Pearl. You will be rewarded with the wonderful additional pieces
and slightly more in the way of annotation. I am happy to have both and
look forward to the Naxos release of Book II.
N.B. I have not heard how the 2nd EMI reissue compares to the two above
and would be interest in what others think.
Ramon Khalona
In article <39E3FC99...@adnc.com>,
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
As usual, the Japanese remastered/pressed Toshiba
LP's leave all the CD reissues in the dust.
dk
>Now hear ye, now hear ye. Comments please on this almighty package,
Bah! It's missing the JSB 3-Keyboard Concerto in D Minor, with pianists
Pavel Serebriakov, Dmitri Shostakovich (deputizing for a sidelined Maria
Yudina), and Tatiana Nikolayeva, with Kyril Kondrashin conducting.
--
Matthew B. Tepper: WWW, science fiction, classical music, ducks!
My personal home page -- http://home.earthlink.net/~oy/index.html
My main music page --- http://home.earthlink.net/~oy/berlioz.html
To write to me, do for my address what Androcles did for the lion
"Compassionate Conservatism?" * "Tight Slacks?" * "Jumbo Shrimp?"
<snip long list>
Aufnahmen 1927-1950.f History. AAD. 20 CDs 39.95 DM. Nr. 49898.
> http://www.zweitausendeins.de/
'History' is the key word. This set, as with anything on this label, is
grossly overpriced.
Yes. How much do you normally pay for garbage?
"Andy Evans" <arts.ps...@cwcom.net> wrote in message
news:3gpF5.3714$QO4.1783@news2-hme0...
> > Aufnahmen 1927-1950.f History. AAD. 20 CDs 39.95 DM. Nr. 49898.
> > > http://www.zweitausendeins.de/
Yes. I bought the Furtwangler 1 box:
recordings were misdated
recordings were misattributed
transfers were poor (even by pirate standards)
in Beethoven symphony 5 the track break between mvts 3 and 4 was in the
wrong place, and a chunk of one movement was simply missing.
plus, to add insult to injury, the liner notes called WF a Nazi.
> Did TD mean to say that the transfers are so bad that they are overpriced
> in any case? It may be so that I will find it out myself. Fang-Lin
A similar big/cheap Furtwangler box was commented upon, by friends, as
being an unbelievably bad organized/transferred/edited etc.
Thomas "Te Deum" might be right.
regards,
SG
"TD" <tj...@spam.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:8s585e$ids$1...@pegasus.csx.cam.ac.uk...
> "Hou Fang-Lin" <fh...@midway.uchicago.edu> wrote in message
> news:bkpF5.109$x3.2194@uchinews...
> > Did TD mean to say that the transfers are so bad that they are
overpriced
> > in any case?
>
> N.B. I have not heard how the 2nd EMI reissue compares to the two above
> and would be interest in what others think.
>
> Ramon Khalona
>
I just want to add that I recently compared the Naxos WTC, Book I to the new
re-mastering of the EMI and I feel that the EMI is superior. It has better
piano tone, greater ambience and dynamic sensitivity. I was very
disappointed with the Naxos (boxy sound, quiet surface with subsequent loss
of pianistic character). By buying the Naxos I was hoping to approximate
the Pearl for less than 1/2 the price. As it stands if you can't afford the
Pearl, I'd recommend going for the more recent EMI on three discs.
Bob
What about the surface noise on the new EMI issue? My experience with
the WTC selections on Fischer's GP series (presumably from the new EMI
set)show some improvement w/respect to overfiltering, but one annoying
feature remains: some clicks, it seems, were edited out with the
resulting sound having a transient "burp" - a kind of an acoustic
"bubble" briefly appearing and bursting right in the middle of a note.
Prelude #4 is as good an example as any.
Vadim.