I have never heard her live and am familiar only with the
following recordings: Droppin' Things; It's Not About the
Melody; Feed the Fire; and Ray Charles and Betty Carter (so
it doesn't quite fit!).
It seems to me that there is a split in the world of jazz
singing about the status of Carter's accomplishments. Carmen
McCrae's disdain -- both personal and musical -- for her is
well documented, and I remember a recent comment in Downbeat
by an up-and-comer that a jazz singer must "sing in tune,
please" -- no doubt directed at Carter. Of course, this also
gets in to the silly Sarah Vaughan vs Ella thing.
I line up rather on the other side. I find Betty Carter to
be a very good composer, a sensitive ensemble player and
leader, an important teacher and mentor for young musicians,
and a fearless and honest explorer and innovator, not to
mention a great singer (although of course this doesn't
necessarily mean a great *voice* like Sarah's). Carter is
anything but conventional in her approach to jazz singing,
for example: her controversial insistence that "it's not
about the melody" but rather about line and colour (like
painting); her "instrumental" (horn-like) approach to
phrasing, scatting, etc; and her notorious use of "dissonant"
harmonies, which always seem at first to be a half tone or
quarter tone "off" but which usually find stunning intervals
that really ring. These are the things which seem to
characterise her style, and they are the things which others
have used to denigrate her explorations and achievements.
What do RMBers think? Obviously most jazz lovers believe
that there is room in jazz singing for both "pure" singers /
interpreters and what Betty does (and many shades in
between). But this does not address her actual technique and
direction and their significance.
Toni C
Toni C
Fascinating, and to my mind, a very accurate assessment - but it could
be Monk, as a vocalist, whom you're describing. No?
I have seen B.C. in person - she adds a lot of warmth, humor and great
audience rapport to her performances - most of which I don't seem to find
present on any of the 6 or so recordings, both live and studio, that I own.
To me she's the singer who is most like another instrument, rather than
just a vocalist, working today.
One thing though - great though she is, I find her tiring to listen to for
an extended time. Something Sarah, Carmen, Dinah and Ernestine simply
don't do to me.
John Levine
jle...@direct.ca
> Date: 6 MAY 1995 05:55:22 GMT
> From: John Levine <jle...@Direct.CA>
> Newgroups: rec.music.bluenote
> Subject: Re: Betty Carter
Maybe I'm just tone deaf or tolerant, but I've never been bothered
by Betty's intonation, live or otherwise. She's certainly not afraid
to sing some pretty dissonant notes by choice, and they work, IMHO.
Abbey Lincoln manages to get accolades and she sings virtually as
flat as I do, which is saying a great deal!
--
"Le jazz, c'est comme les bananes - ca se consomme sur place."
Sartre
><<one of the most frequent criticisms of her is that she sings flat
>(and she certainly has in the various times I have seen her live)>>
>
>Maybe I'm just tone deaf or tolerant, but I've never been bothered
>by Betty's intonation, live or otherwise. She's certainly not afraid
>to sing some pretty dissonant notes by choice, and they work, IMHO.
>
>Abbey Lincoln manages to get accolades and she sings virtually as
>flat as I do, which is saying a great deal!
I was bothered by her intonation at first, but have gotten used to it and
don't find it bothers me much these days.
--
-Lynn (rar...@auriga.rose.brandeis.edu)
That must have been incredible! Last year I got to see Betty and Abbey
perform with their bands on the same bill in SF. At the end, they sang
"What a little Moonlight Can Do" together, doing the scattin at ya thing.
It was a perfect capper for a perfect evening.