More Dirty Licks from David Sharp (A.K.A. Salvador Astucia)
salvado...@jewsarenice.com
whose reral name is David Sharp..
<cropdu...@cs.com> wrote:(snip)
The delusions usually abate if raving schizos like Salvador
(aka David L. Sharp) take their meds.
Sometimes a frontal lobotomy is the only answer
To see what Salvadore really looks lilke go to
http://Salvador.Astucia.psychohottie.com/personal.php
===================================================
Ron Nasty's proof that Salvaodre's real name is David Sharp...
===================================================
Anti-semitic propagandist and deranged conspiracy theorist "Salvador
Astucia" inadvertently reveals his identity on his own website,
several times.
David L. Sharp
15137 Winesap Drive
Gaithersburg , MD 20878
Please ignore his hapless attempts at disinformation, based on him
having a common name which is shared by numerous others (including a
former guitarist of the Alarm).
To see the proof for yourself, go to any of the pages below, save the
scanned letter to your desktop, and use Photoshop or other
photo-enhancement software to significantly brighten the image. If you
do so, his inked-out address and signature become easily legible
beneath
his scribbles.
http://www.jfkmontreal.com/john_lennon/exhibit_m.htm
http://www.jfkmontreal.com/john_lennon/exhibit_n.htm
http://www.jfkmontreal.com/john_lennon/exhibit_o.htm
http://www.jfkmontreal.com/john_lennon/exhibit_p.htm
http://www.jfkmontreal.com/john_lennon/exhibit_q.htm
http://www.jfkmontreal.com/john_lennon/exhibit_r.htm
http://www.jfkmontreal.com/john_lennon/exhibit_s.htm
http://www.jfkmontreal.com/john_lennon/exhibit_t.htm
>I don't do this because I think knowing his identity is all that
>important (it isn't), but just in the hopes that Salvador/David will
>give up these tedious, tedious, tedious denials and deflections, say
>"OK, I'm David Sharp...so what???" and move onto other topics. He
>doesn't seem to realize that this will become much less of a "nagging
>issue," once he freely admits the truth.
I also would propose that someone post a few "brightened" letters in
his/her alloted webspace, so that the evidence will be available in a
location which Sharp himself doesn't control.
The delusions usually abate if raving schizos like Salvador
(aka David L. Sharp) take their meds.
Sometimes a frontal lobotomy is the only answer
And the truth about him is best left here at these links...
http://Salvador.Astucia.swellserver.com/news/top_stories/outwithbang.php
For more exciting news on Salvador Astucia
http://Salvador.Astucia.swellserver.com/news/top_stories/arrested.php
To see what Salvadore really looks lilke go to
http://Salvador.Astucia.psychohottie.com/personal.php
==========================================
How to erase Salvadore Astucia's
(real name: David Sharp) posts from this newsgroup
==========================================
well you can always erase most of he writes if you have
freeagent as a newsgroup reader...
With freeagent you can actually ERASE HIS POSTS FROM THE INTERNET
OFF MOST SERVER SITES!!!!!!!!!!
First left click on the top bar Options
then select User and system profile.
In the email address section type in salvadores usernet name and
details exactly as he posts it.
Then click ok.
Left click on Post and then right click on"Cancel usenet message"
then his posts will be cancelled from most usernet sites...except for
google.
==========================================
How to erase Salvadore Astucia's
(real name: David Sharp) posts from this newsgroup
==========================================
well you can always erase most of he writes if you have
freeagent as a newsgroup reader...
With freeagent you can actually ERASE HIS POSTS FROM THE INTERNET
OFF MOST SERVER SITES!!!!!!!!!!
First left click on the top bar Options
then select User and system profile.
In the email address section type in salvadores usernet name and
details exactly as he posts it.
Then click ok.
Left click on Post and then right click on"Cancel usenet message"
then his posts will be cancelled from most usernet sites...except for
google.
Salvador Astucia
What sore losers these guys are.
Jose Joaquin Sanjenis Perdomo, Lennon's true assassin(?)
http://www.jfkmontreal.com/john_lennon/Usenet/Perdomo.htm
Salvador Astucia
===
Critical Thought on Tsunami
http://www.jfkmontreal.com/Indonesia/Quake.htm
Sean Strub - Mark David Chapman's primary accuser
http://www.jfkmontreal.com/john_lennon/Usenet/Strub.htm
Holocaust: gas chambers & Zyklon-B cannisters
http://www.jfkmontreal.com/john_lennon/Usenet/zyklonb.htm
The ancient cult of Judaism
http://www.come-and-hear.com
salvado...@jewsarenice.com
<cropdu...@cs.com> wrote:
><SNIP>
>
Oh David Please shut up. No one believes your nonsense and
you're making a complete ass of yourself by
posting such stupid crap on your website.Page after page of nonsense,
none of it being at all logical.
and stop insulting a good soccer player..
the case was solved 24 years ago...get over it
Andy Walker
David L Sharp aka Salvador Astucia can be viewed at the following link
http://web.archive.org/web/20040324155035/http://dstechwriter.com/
NATO
>>David L Sharp aka Salvador Astucia can be viewed at the following link
>>http://web.archive.org/web/20040324155035/http://dstechwriter.com/
>
>
> That's him, huh? Looks like Benny Hill's little brother.
>
> A little anticlimactic, actually. I was picturing more of a bulging-eyed
> Christopher Lloyd/Jack Elam look. ;)
That boy sure has ugly cornered.
Salvador Astucia
Andy Walker wrote:
> > Salvador Astucia can be viewed at the following link
<snip>
poisoned rose wrote:
> That's him, huh? Looks like Benny Hill's little brother.
>
> A little anticlimactic, actually. I was picturing more of a
bulging-eyed
> Christopher Lloyd/Jack Elam look. ;)
FYI, a reliable source just informed me that
the entity known as Gibson Vendettuoli--the
person who did the *brilliant* research on
my identity--is actually a 14 year old boy
named Bud Gibson. It's ironic that Bud Gibson
has made it his sole purpose in life to guess
my true identity when he himself uses a pseudonym
as well. With adult role models like Andy Walker,
what else can we expect from punks like Bud?
BTW, I've checked the real URL (as opposed to
the one Andy Walker posted), and there's no
photograph on it. Apparently Andy or Bud Gibson
doctored up the original web page, although
it is unclear what they're trying to prove.
As far as I can tell, Andy Walker is getting
a lot of heat from an article I wrote about
his bogus JFK assassination discussion group
known as the "Education Forum" (what a joke).
The article describes how Andy booted me from
his forum for *refusing* to discuss the Holocaust.
Now Andy has the nerve to call me a Nazi. Using
Andy's twisted logic, I who should be calling HIM
a NAZI since he wanted to have a discussion about
the Holocaust on his bogus website and I refused.
Here is the article that has Andy's bowels in
such an uproar:
"UK educational program promotes Zionist propaganda"
http://www.jfkmontreal.com/ngfl/edforum.htm
What more can I say? The National Grid for Learning
should be banned. They're the larger group that
allows Andy to link his propaganda page to its
network. The NGFL is funded by the UK's Department
of Education. The UK should cut the NGFL's budget
completely, and that will be the end of Andy Walker's
bogus propaganda forum.
Salvador Astucia
PS. How come Michael Jackson gets persecuted
for being friends with children while odd
looking characters like Andy Walker are doing
God knows what with 14 year old boys like Bud Gibson?
===
To order Salvador Astucia's books, click here:
http://www.jfkmontreal.com
poisoned rose
> It's ironic that Bud Gibson
> has made it his sole purpose in life to guess
> my true identity when he himself uses a pseudonym
> as well.
Since all your posts on that Education Forum website are under the name
"David L Sharp," aren't you at least going to drop your lame subterfuge
about your real name now?
Bunyip
Salvador Astucia
> Notice - in that entire bloated screed, he denied nothing.
Smokescreen.
Smokescreen? I pointed out that the person who
did the research on my so-called true identity
himself uses a pseudonym. Your denial of this
information is a *huge* smokescreen.
The person who supplied virtually all of the
information about my alleged true identity uses
the screen name Gibson Vendettuoli; however,
I have recently been advised by an individual
within the law enforcement community that
Vendettuoli's real name is Bud Gibson
and he is a young teenager.
This new information severely undercuts Mr. Gibson's
credibility and his motivation for making it
his life's purpose to guess my true identity.
This kid has publicly called other people phonies for
not using their real names on the Internet, and he
himself is the biggest phony of them all because
he too uses a pseudonym. I, like many people, use
a pseudonym because I write about controversial
topics which could potentially get me fired from
my job if my identity were exposed.
Having stated that, Bud Gibson has presented no
tangible evidence that I am the individual he
claims I am. Much of his research relies upon his
own credibility as a researcher, something which
has completely evaporated. And it is clear that
anyone who wants to expose my identity is doing
it solely because of the two books I have written
and my website. Such people are the enemies of
free speech.
In short, those who are trying to guess my true
name are working with the Internet Thought Police.
Bud Gibson (aka, Gibson Vendettuoli) appears to be
backed by Andy Walker and John Simkin, moderators
for a UK discussion group dealing with the
JFK assassination. Walker and Simkin are angry
with me for writing the following article about
their bogus group:
"UK educational program promotes Zionist propaganda"
http://www.jfkmontreal.com/ngfl/edforum.htm
On a more serious note, I would strongly advise everyone
to drop this discussion--for their own welfare--because
there is a lot more involved here than my real name or
Bud Gibson's real name. If you continue to discussing
the actions of Bud Gibson and his handlers, that could
potentially pull you into a criminal conspiracy.
(HINT: I am not the only person investigating Bud Gibson.)
Just a word of caution. If you choose to ignore it,
that is your right. But don't come crying to me
or anyone else if you should end up in the slammer,
which is a real possibility if you continue to
support this punk.
Salvador Astucia
===
Best website on the Net=> http://www.jfkmontreal.com
poisoned rose
Smokescreen, yet again. Gibson's real name is irrelevant to the
information he presented about your own name.
And since you dodged my last post, I'll just ask again: Why bother with
all the evasion about your name...and always deceitfully describing talk
about your name in terms of "guessing your identity" (the "guessing" was
over long ago)...when you yourself now post on the Web as David L Sharp?
Examples:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=+site%3Aeducationforum.ipbhost.c
om+%22salvador+astucia%22+%22david+l+sharp%22&btnG=Search
Also, since everyone on the forums which you abuse knows your real name,
and yet you've apparently experienced no resulting problems at your day
job, why do you keep pretending this issue is of such grave personal
danger to your livelihood? Or, better question: Why do you so boldly
thrust yourself in harm's way by aggressively abusing Internet forums
who don't want you around?
As ever, the truth is obvious: If you would stop the pitiful games about
denying your name, there would be far less "embarrassing" talk about it.
Then you could argue about your demented conspiracy theories instead,
which presumably (?) is your greater interest.
Also, if your day job is so great, I would definitely advise
"investigating" (you're awfully fond of investigating...) whether its
health benefits include coverage of psychiatric treatment.
Salted Nuts
finest posts you ever wrote.
"poisoned rose" <pros...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:prose3125-66800...@newssvr13-ext.news.prodigy.com...
Salvador Astucia
poisoned rose wrote:
> Smokescreen, yet again. Gibson's real name is irrelevant to the
> information he presented about your own name.
<snip>
Question. On one hand, you say it's okay to guess
my real name, but on the other hand, you say it's
irrelevant that the person who claims to have proof
of my identity also uses a pseudonym. How do
you reconcile such hypocrisy?
Frankly, I think it's hilarious that Bud Gibson
(alias, Gibson Vendettuoli) has been revealed as
a fake, a phony and a hypocrite. What unmitigated
gall. This kid is teenage psycho freak.
And by the way, what is Poisoned Rose's real
name?
What is Salted Nuts' real name?
What is Bunyip's real name?
Why the paranoia about my use of a pseudonym?
Salvador Astucia
PS. Once again, I strongly urge people to stop
discussing Bud Gibson's shenanigans, for their
own well-being. That is not a threat, but
apparently some people do not know what I am
referring to. I suggest that those people check
things out with their FBI handlers before
responding further.
===
Take a good look at this website:
http://www.jfkmontreal.com
Have you read this?
poisoned rose
> Question. On one hand, you say it's okay to guess
> my real name, but on the other hand, you say it's
> irrelevant that the person who claims to have proof
> of my identity also uses a pseudonym. How do
> you reconcile such hypocrisy?
It's not hypocrisy...it's *indifference*. Gibsonwhatever has scarcely
posted here (if at all?), so no one cares about his identity. He also
hasn't poured months of energy into tearing the newsgroup's content to
ribbons. Is this distinction so tough to understand?
Also, *everyone* with any sizable exposure to you has proof of your
identity, as you well know. The evidence on your own website has been
documented countless times, and now you have confirmed the name even
more conclusively, via your new webposts under your true name. (Of
course, you'll clip this paragraph if/when you respond, and just go back
to evasively babbling about Gibsonwhatever.)
Web confirmation of Salvador/David's name:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=+site%3Aeducationforum.ipbhost.c
om+%22salvador+astucia%22+%22david+l+sharp%22&btnG=Search
A second picture of David:
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showuser=2352
Bunyip
LOVE the moustache.
Salvador Astucia
> > Question. On one hand, you say it's okay to guess
> > my real name, but on the other hand, you say it's
> > irrelevant that the person who claims to have proof
> > of my identity also uses a pseudonym. How do
> > you reconcile such hypocrisy?
poisoned rose wrote:
> It's not hypocrisy...it's *indifference*. Gibsonwhatever has scarcely
> posted here (if at all?), so no one cares about his identity.
First, his name is not Gibsonwhatever. His real name
is Bud Gibson, and he's a 14 year old punk. He posts
under the pseudonym, Gibson Vendettuoli, but I shall
refer to him by his real name, Bud Gibson, since
everyone is interested in real names. (BTW, what is
Poisoned Rose's real name?)
True, Bud Gibson may not post here very often, but the
so-called evidence you (PR) are presenting about my alleged
identity was gathered by Bud Gibson. He is Andy Walker's
sole source. Much of Bud Gibson's information relies
solely on trust in him as someone with a degree of
integrity. The fact that Bud Gibson himself used
a pseudonym undercuts his credibility dramatically.
Second, what makes you so sure that the two pictures
you presented (which you claim are me) are the same
person? They look nothing alike. Is that your *proof*?
How do you explain the dramatic difference in appearance?
He also
> hasn't poured months of energy into tearing the newsgroup's content
to
> ribbons. Is this distinction so tough to understand?
I understand it, but it is an absurd distinction.
Basically you're saying you're admitting you object
to free speech and any conduct is acceptable to
prevent people like myself from posting controversial
material on this newsgroup. I merely posted information
about John Lennon's murder, and many people support me
because many have ordered my book: "Rethinking John Lennon's
Assassination." A handful of entities have criticized
me since day one, and I respond to their criticisms.
If they would not engage in such vicious attacks,
I would not need to respond. Many of my supporters
have shown their support by cloning my attackers and
posting ridiculous remarks to make them look like fools.
I do not encourage such behavior, but obviously many of
my critics are hated by a significant number of people.
Drawing a comparison between a small number of people
who dislike my postings and Bud Gibson's hypocrisy
has nothing to do with anything. Bud Gibson (alias,
Gibson Vendettuoli) has made it his life's mission to
expose other people on the Internet who use pseudonyms,
but I just learned that he uses a pseudonym himself.
This hypocrite/phony punk is the same individual who
supplied the research about my so-called true identity.
Doesn't such dishonesty make you wonder about the quality
of his research?
> Also, *everyone* with any sizable exposure to you has proof of your
> identity, as you well know.
Accusations are not the same as proof.
The evidence on your own website has been
> documented countless times,
What has been documented is a piece of paper with a name on
it, which can easily be forged. Is that your so-called proof?
and now you have confirmed the name even
> more conclusively, via your new webposts under your true name.
I have only posted under my pseudonym. The moderators John Simkin
and Andy Walker manually changed the identity of the original
postings based on information provided by Bud Gibson (alias,
Gibson Vendettuoli). The fact that Simkin and Walker would
tamper with existing postings says quite a bit about their
own lack of integrity. I told Simkin in advance that I used
a pseudonym, and he said it would be acceptable to post under
the pseudonym. Later he changed his mind and tampered with
my postings. Simkin and Walker are clearly thugs and have
been discredited by their own actions.
Simkin and Walker are just angry over the following article
which exposes they bogus discussion forum for the phony
operation it truly is:
"UK educational program promotes Zionist propaganda"
http://www.jfkmontreal.com/ngfl/edforum.htm
(Of
> course, you'll clip this paragraph if/when you respond, and just go
back
> to evasively babbling about Gibsonwhatever.)
It would be nice if you would refer to the kid by his real
name, Bud Gibson, instead of Gibsonwhatever. For someone
who claims to dislike pseudonyms, it's odd that you keep
forgetting Bud Gibson's real name. By the way, you dodged
my previous question. WHAT IS YOUR REAL NAME? (third request)
> Web confirmation of Salvador's name:
>
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=+site%3Aeducationforum.ipbhost.c
> om+%22salvador+astucia%22+%22david+l+sharp%22&btnG=Search
>
> A second picture of
> http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showuser=2352
Again, that picture looks nothing like the other one.
Is that your so-called proof?
Salvador Astucia
====
Best darn website around. http://www.jfkmontreal.com
Andy Walker
David L Sharp aka Salvador Astucia can be viewed at the following link
http://web.archive.org/web/20040324155035/http://dstechwriter.com/
I'm told he's really a very nice man
Salted Nuts
"Andy Walker" <an...@educationforum.co.uk> wrote in message
news:fde467a1.0502...@posting.google.com...
Yes, as is evdient from his loving writing style. Still no denial it's him,
just more obfuscation.
BTW: Sally, if everyone you've named, myself included, had their bowels in
an uproar over your (snicker) articles, the country would be buried in shit
and there wold be no more conspiracies.
poisoned rose
> First, his name is not Gibsonwhatever. His real name
> is Bud Gibson, and he's a 14 year old punk. He posts
> under the pseudonym, Gibson Vendettuoli, but I shall
> refer to him by his real name, Bud Gibson, since
> everyone is interested in real names.
>
> True, Bud Gibson may not post here very often, but the
> so-called evidence you (PR) are presenting about my alleged
> identity was gathered by Bud Gibson. He is Andy Walker's
> sole source. Much of Bud Gibson's information relies
> solely on trust in him as someone with a degree of
> integrity. The fact that Bud Gibson himself used
> a pseudonym undercuts his credibility dramatically.
...zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz...
> Second, what makes you so sure that the two pictures
> you presented (which you claim are me) are the same
> person? They look nothing alike. Is that your *proof*?
They are the same person (you)...you just "disguised" yourself with a
hat and moustache in the second shot. Whoopee. And since the first
picture was only stored on a web-archive site, I also assume you're a
bit younger in that photo than in the second shot.
> > He also
> > hasn't poured months of energy into tearing the newsgroup's content
> > to ribbons. Is this distinction so tough to understand?
>
> I understand it, but it is an absurd distinction.
> Basically you're saying you're admitting you object
> to free speech and any conduct is acceptable to
> prevent people like myself from posting controversial
> material on this newsgroup. I merely posted information
> about John Lennon's murder
If you "merely" posted information about your Lennon conspiracy theory,
you wouldn't be anywhere near as reviled as you are. It's the totally
off-topic Nazi-sympathizing, Holocaust denial, anti-semitism,
gay-bashing and wholly deranged "spook" delusions which have made you
hated. Get it now?
> Many of my supporters
> have shown their support by cloning my attackers and
> posting ridiculous remarks to make them look like fools.
> I do not encourage such behavior, but obviously many of
> my critics are hated by a significant number of people.
Lordy. Now your woozy brain is inventing both allies *and* enemies for
yourself.
> The evidence on your own website has been
> > documented countless times,
>
> What has been documented is a piece of paper with a name on
> it, which can easily be forged. Is that your so-called proof?
A) You just said "your" name is on the letters, which is an admission
that it's your real name.
B) The "paper" is posted on *your own website*, dummy. What, you're
claiming that you forged *yourself*?
Salvador Astucia
> Salvador Astucia wrote:
> > Basically you're saying you're admitting you object
> > to free speech and any conduct is acceptable to
> > prevent people like myself from posting controversial
> > material on this newsgroup. I merely posted information
> > about John Lennon's murder
Poisoned Rose <Nick Andrews> wrote:
> If you "merely" posted information about your Lennon conspiracy
theory,
> you wouldn't be anywhere near as reviled as you are. It's the totally
> off-topic Nazi-sympathizing, Holocaust denial, anti-semitism,
> gay-bashing and wholly deranged "spook" delusions which have made you
> hated. Get it now?
You're doing some major backpedaling. You're claiming that
had I stuck to a Lennon conspiracy theory that folks like
you would have approved of my writings. That sounds good,
but your comments simply do not match reality. When I first
began posting on rec.music.beatles in the spring of 2003,
the topic of Jose Perdomo (doorman at the Dakota on the night
John Lennon was killed) caused quite a commotion.
In fact, I was attacked more viscously over a Perdomo
thread than any other. The following people attempted to
stop all discussion of Jose Perdomo:
- Tna Yzarc (later learned this was a screen name
of Nick Andrews; it's "Crazy Ant" spelled
backwards.)
- Black Monk
- Charlie Gauger (aka, Mister Charlie)
- Ehtue
- Susan from PA
The following is a description (from my book, "Rethinking
John Lennon's Assassination") of how these five entities
tried desperately to disrupt a Perdomo thread in the
spring of 2003:
Chapter 4: FBI Surveillance on the Internet
http://www.jfkmontreal.com/john_lennon/Chapter04.htm
In Dec. 2004, I discovered that someone named Jose Perdomo
was a member of Brigade 2506 during the Bay of Pigs
Invasion in 1961, a failed CIA operation to overthrow
Fidel Castro. Perdomo's full name was Jose Joaquin
Sanjenis Perdomo, but he used his middle names,
Joaquin Sanjenis, as an alias. He also called himself
Sam Jenis. It was learned that Sanjenis worked closely
with convicted Watergate burglar Frank Sturgis
(deceased) for about ten years on the CIA's payroll,
running a black operation project called "Operation 40,"
which performed assassinations, among other things.
This new information about Sanjenis introduces the
very real possibility that Sanjenis may have been
Lennon's true killer. This would explain why
Nick Andrews, Black Monk, Charlie Gauger, Ehtue,
and Susan from PA tried so desperately to stop
any discussion about Perdomo (aka, Sanjenis)
a year and a half ago when I first broached the
subject.
It appears that Nick Andrews, Black Monk, Charlie
Gauger, Ehtue, and Susan from PA are not your
garden variety Usenet Thought Police (spooks).
These people are criminals, directly involved
in the conspiracy to murder John Lennon.
By obstructing public dialog about Sanjenis,
most likely Lennon's killer, they made themselves
part of a criminal conspiracy.
Sanjenis's background is described in the following
article:
Jose Joaquin Sanjenis Perdomo, Lennon's true assassin(?)
http://www.jfkmontreal.com/john_lennon/Usenet/Perdomo.htm
Recently Nick Andrews and his friends sank so low as
to recruit a 14 year old boy named Bud Gibson (alias,
Gibson Vendettuoli) to play some additional dirty tricks
on me, but they backfired bigtime.
BTW, what ever happened to the little shit, Bud Gibson?
Salvador Astucia
===
UK educational program promotes Zionist propaganda
http://www.jfkmontreal.com/ngfl/edforum.htm
Critical Thought on Tsunami
http://www.jfkmontreal.com/Indonesia/Quake.htm
To order Salvador Astucia's books, click here:
http://jfkmontreal.com
poisoned rose
> Poisoned Rose <Nick Andrews> wrote:
<snicker>
> > If you "merely" posted information about your Lennon conspiracy
> theory,
> > you wouldn't be anywhere near as reviled as you are. It's the totally
> > off-topic Nazi-sympathizing, Holocaust denial, anti-semitism,
> > gay-bashing and wholly deranged "spook" delusions which have made you
> > hated. Get it now?
>
> You're doing some major backpedaling. You're claiming that
> had I stuck to a Lennon conspiracy theory that folks like
> you would have approved of my writings.
Don't put words in my mouth. No, I am not claiming this. I wrote that
you "wouldn't be anywhere near as reviled as you are." That's a far cry
from being "approved." If you only posted about your Lennon
murder-conspiracy theories, you still would be viewed as a pest and a
conspiracy nut (similar to, say, "Sixties Gen"), but you wouldn't be
seen as a detestable, bigoted Nazi vermin.
MacBeatle
Salvador Astucia wrote:
>
> - Tna Yzarc (later learned this was a screen name
> of Nick Andrews; it's "Crazy Ant" spelled
> backwards.)
> - Black Monk
> - Charlie Gauger (aka, Mister Charlie)
> - Ehtue
> - Susan from PA
>
You sure know how to get 'em "talking"!
I wonder if Cherkles (my nickname for Charles Gauger of Morgan Hill,
CA) realizes by now that all his efforts to kill my career as a writer
(and indeed, his expressed wishes for my death) are a useless waste of
time. I also wonder if he's been enjoying some of the religiously
oriented email he's been receiving in his "smokerdude66" yahoo
account... I know I have.
Perhaps the time has come for Mr. Gauger to spend a little more of
what's left of his own life force on Christian studies and a little
less time acting out his murderous impulses.
Congratulations, Sally.
Oh. P.S. I like your hit list.
Francie
Salted Nuts
"MacBeatle" <waro...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1109028272.8...@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Salvador Astucia wrote:
>>
>> - Tna Yzarc (later learned this was a screen name
>> of Nick Andrews; it's "Crazy Ant" spelled
>> backwards.)
>> - Black Monk
>> - Charlie Gauger (aka, Mister Charlie)
>> - Ehtue
>> - Susan from PA
>>
>
> You sure know how to get 'em "talking"!
>
> I wonder if Cherkles (my nickname for Charles Gauger of Morgan Hill,
> CA) realizes by now that all his efforts to kill my career as a writer
I never tried. However, your "career" has been long dead without any help
from me.
> (and indeed, his expressed wishes for my death)
There ya go. Pull a Hunter S and join that pantheon of crazy shit dead
authors you admire so. Not that you're in their league, alive OR dead.
are a useless waste of
> time. I also wonder if he's been enjoying some of the religiously
> oriented email he's been receiving in his "smokerdude66" yahoo
> account... I know I have.
Since I haven't been getting any it's hard to say. Christian spam? My,
what are you, 12?
>
> Perhaps the time has come for Mr. Gauger to spend a little more of
> what's left of his own life force on Christian studies and a little
> less time acting out his murderous impulses.
If I ever acted out anything you wouldn't be writing this. Hence, I am not
acting out anything.
NATO
Don't worry Charles. If you did act it out you'd be doing us a favor.
Cupid Stunt
Congratulations, Sally.
Oh. P.S. I like your hit list.
Francie
Well, he finally has a ally... until he checks her 'heritage', of
course.
Barring that, Francid and PsychoSal, mazeltov ! Name a child after
me,sweetie.
MacBeatle
"salted nuts" is... kind of a funny name for someone with neither nuts,
nor salt. You're yellow vanilla, boy.
If you have a Bible in your house, you'd better dust it off and read
it.
You have no clue about which writers I admire. But as far as Hunter is
concerned, you're not fit to lick the cowshit off his boots. btw, did
you know that he sold his "art" for thousands in Aspen? Or that he made
several of these in-your-face works by shooting up such corporate
symbols as the Disney logo? May not be your cuppa diarrhea, Cherkles,
but at least it was original, expressed his anger, and raised some real
money... which is more than anyone can say about the flaccid paintings
of your hero McCartney.
LOFL
Salted Nuts
"Cupid Stunt" <ohnoi...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1109035656....@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Jew. Lovely, innit?
Salted Nuts
> Well well well (a wonderful Lennon song...) at least we know who
> "salted nuts" is... kind of a funny name for someone with neither nuts,
> nor salt. You're yellow vanilla, boy.
I never hid the fact, tramp.
>
> If you have a Bible in your house, you'd better dust it off and read
> it.
I do, and I won't. Not on your recommendation. Why? Screwing some new
gangsters lately? Blind mobsters?
>
> You have no clue about which writers I admire.
Nor do I care. I based my comment on your blatherings last night.
But as far as Hunter is
> concerned, you're not fit to lick the cowshit off his boots.
Thankfully I won't have to. He's dead.
btw, did
> you know that he sold his "art" for thousands in Aspen? Or that he made
> several of these in-your-face works by shooting up such corporate
> symbols as the Disney logo? May not be your cuppa diarrhea, Cherkles,
> but at least it was original, expressed his anger, and raised some real
> money... which is more than anyone can say about the flaccid paintings
> of your hero McCartney.
BTW: Who gives a fuck? Besides, you, I mean?
>
> LOFL
Whew. And the scratching, scraping, screaching laughter echoes off her
empty room walls.
>
NATO
I'm not sure she's Jewish. Most Jews I know have common sense and don't
live in the past.
Salvador Astucia
> >
> > - Tna Yzarc (later learned this was a screen name
> > of Nick Andrews; it's "Crazy Ant" spelled
> > backwards.)
> > - Black Monk
> > - Charlie Gauger (aka, Mister Charlie)
> > - Ehtue
> > - Susan from PA
> >
MacBeatle wrote:
> You sure know how to get 'em "talking"!
>
> I wonder if Cherkles (my nickname for Charles Gauger of Morgan Hill,
> CA) realizes by now that all his efforts to kill my career as a
writer
> (and indeed, his expressed wishes for my death) are a useless waste
of
> time.
He's paid to do it, so from his perspective, it's just
another day's work as a member of the Thought Police.
One thing I find hilarious about Charlie is how he seems
to become genuinely upset when I refer to him as a member
of the Thought Police. Doesn't he understand what he does?
But Charlie appears to more than a typical Thought Police
whore. He seems to have direct knowledge of the people who
really murdered John Lennon. Charlie has apparently known
all along that Sanjenis (real name, Jose Joaquin Sanjenis
Perdomo) was John Lennon's true killer. That's why Charlie
and Nick Andrews led an effort to attack me on this
newsgroup when I first mentioned Perdomo in the spring
of 2003.
Here is a recent article that describes the man who
really killed John Lennon:
(NOTE: Charlie when into hiding right after this article
was published.)
Jose Joaquin Sanjenis Perdomo, Lennon's true assassin(?)
http://www.jfkmontreal.com/john_lennon/Usenet/Perdomo.htm
Here is a chapter from my book, "Rethinking John Lennon's
Assassination," which describes how Charlie et al tried
to cover-up the truth about Perdomo/Sanjenis (the doorman):
Chapter 4: FBI Surveillance on the Internet
http://www.jfkmontreal.com/john_lennon/Chapter04.htm
Keep hiding Charlie. You've got reason to be afraid.
Salvador Astucia
====
The website that has the Thought Police pulling their
hair out by the roots: http://www.jfkmontreal.com
Salvador Astucia
> http://www.jfkmontreal.com/ngfl/edforum.htm
>
> I'm told he's really a very nice man
Nothing to add to that.
Salvador Astucia
===
This website has really got people talking.
http://www.jfkmontreal.com
MacBeatle
Salted Nuts wrote:
>
>
> Whew. And the scratching, scraping, screaching laughter echoes off
her
> empty room walls.
>
You can't write for shit, but I must admit, that last one made me and
Somebody laugh. If you could see my walls... oh nevermind.
Cupid Stunt
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/lofiversion/index.php/t3097.html
Cupid Stunt
brag about.
Salvador Astucia
I laughed too when Charlie admitted he didn't have
any nuts. (Why admit the obvious?)
Salvador Astucia
====
Check out this website. http://www.jfkmontreal.com
Jane Asher's Vagina
> which is more than anyone can say about the flaccid paintings
> of your hero McCartney.
Flaccid. Hm. I guess he never got a decent blowjob.
Gibson Vendettuoli
to at least be on good speaking terms with you. I am not Bud Gibson
(whoever the hell you got that from is loco), although I am quite
young. I'm sure you could check this out for yourself, having friends
in the law enforcement community. Oooh, but wait...they're Zionists,
too, in your sick twisted world view, now aren't they?
I'd suggest you not call me a teenage psycho freak, as you have seen I
have much worse I can throw at you. I am not a fake or a phony, but I
once was. However, to call me a hypocrite is out of bounds; it implies
I use a double standard. Vendettuoli is not currently my legal last
name, but I'm not giving you it anyway and it will be changed soon.
Hint: It's also Italian and Catholic, like me, before you accuse me for
the umpteenth time of being a Zionist.
If you don't mind, stop badmouthing me on RMB and leave all of us
alone. We care about John, but we've already got the murderer and no
one really ever wants to hear about a conspiracy theory because it
means they have to do something about it. The country is lazy, but that
doesn't mean you can shove it in our faces, you blighter.
G
Gibson Vendettuoli
then you are fucking stupid. They make caches of older versions of
websites. You had the photo up and then took it down. It's not there
now, but it was there then, as the archived copy shows.
Cupid Stunt
You're not Nick Andrews, then? Everyone in here who disagrees with him
(meaning everyone, I assume) is called 'Nick Andrews'.
Unless I'm Bud Gibson now... super secret agent assigned to David Sharp!
Salvador Astucia
<snip>
> I'd suggest you not call me a teenage psycho freak, as you have seen
I
> have much worse I can throw at you.
What on earth are you talking about, Bud?
What exactly did you throw at me?
And why are you so thin-skinned, particularly in the
area of your emotional imbalance?
Frankly, your problem is likely not your own doing.
Bad parents are usually the root cause of maladjusted,
unbalanced, weird children like yourself. I expect your
father James was too rough on your mother when he
sexually violated her, thereby conceiving a bad seed.
The end result was a teenage psycho freak pantywaist.
Your parents should be ashamed.
Salvador Astucia
===
To buy Salvador Astucia's books, click here:
http://www.jfkmontreal.com
Gibson Vendettuoli
924-2793 in my hands. When I call it, don't lie.