Beatles songs to employ orchestra?

[zepf...@gmail.com]

What are all the Beatles songs to use an orchestra?

A Day In The Life
All You Need Is Love

I like both songs and I think those are their two best

[Kachina]

Fuck off, Raja

[who?]

You're the same ole person you used to be, and it wasn't
hard for me to figure out who you are.

[BeatleEd]

It all depends on how you define an "Orchestra"
The following Beatles songs use orchestral musicians:

You've Got To Hide Your Love Away
Yesterday
Love You To
Eleanor Rigby
Got To Get You Into My Life
For No One
Strawberry Fields Forever
When I'm Sixty-Four
Penny Lane

A Day In The Life

Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band
Good Morning Good Morning
Within You Without You
She's Leaving Home
Within You Without You
Only A Northern Song
Magical Mystery Tour
It's All Too Much

All You Need Is Love

I Am The Walrus
Blue Jay Way
Shirley's Wild Accordion
The Fool On The Hill
Hello, Goodbye
Lady Madonna
Revolution 1
Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da
Revolution
Don't Pass Me By
Good Night
Hey Jude
Mother Nature's Son
Honey Pie
Martha My Dear
Piggies
Glass Onion
Savoy Truffle
Here Comes The Sun
Golden Slumbers/Carry That Weight
The End
Something
Here Comes The Sun
Octopus's Garden
Let It Be
Across The Universe
The Long And Winding Road
I Me Mine

[Kachina]

On Saturday, June 22, 2013 7:36:08 PM UTC-4, who? wrote:
> You're the same ole person you used to be, and it wasn't
>
> hard for me to figure out who you are.

Gee, if it was so obvious even YOU could figure it out, I must have been wearing a neon sign.

Either that, or you're utterly confused again. Ask God for guidance -- just bang your head on the wall and he'll appear.

[who?]

I just remember your name, that's all. A lot of posters
came and left over the years. Whatever it was that I
did to make you angry, I apologize.

[zepf...@yahoo.com]

Holy shit. If these many songs did employ a full piece orchestra, Beatles might be the most symphonic rock band ever... Even more so than Moody Blues and ELO

[ermitano]

El domingo, 23 de junio de 2013 19:00:29 UTC-4, zepf...@yahoo.com escribió:
> Holy shit. If these many songs did employ a full piece orchestra, Beatles might be the most symphonic rock band ever... Even more so than Moody Blues and ELO

those are songs employing 1 or more orchestral musicians, not the full orchestra necessarily

[BeatleEd]

That's what he said.

[Stephen X. Carter]

On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 21:28:16 -0500, super70s <supe...@super70s.invalid>
wrote:

>In article <07451929-5055-4eca...@googlegroups.com>,

>Orchestral musicians were okay but no female backup singers, I remember
>a quote from John I think being emphatic about that.
>
>I don't guess he was singling out women especially, I guess he meant
>only the Beatles were going to sing on their records. And of course
>there's some technical violations of that policy, like Revolution 9.

And "Across The Universe" - and I'd hardly describe that as a techincal
violation!

--
steve.hat.stephencarter.not.com.but.net
Nothing is Beatle Proof!!
Mr Kite posters and more at http://www.zazzle.com/mr_kite*
Mr Kite posters and more at http://www.zazzle.co.uk/mr_kite*

[who?]

And Eric Clapton says, no one plays on a Beatles record.

[who?]

On Saturday, June 22, 2013 9:42:43 PM UTC-5, BeatleEd wrote:

I hear no orchestra on "Love you to." "Octopus's
garden?" I'll have a listen.

[BeatleEd]

Stephen X. Carter <steve@[127.0.0.1]> wrote:

> On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 21:28:16 -0500, super70s
> <supe...@super70s.invalid> wrote:
>
>>In article <07451929-5055-4eca...@googlegroups.com>,
>> zepf...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>>> Holy shit. If these many songs did employ a full piece orchestra,
>>> Beatles might be the most symphonic rock band ever... Even more so
>>> than Moody Blues and ELO
>>
>>Orchestral musicians were okay but no female backup singers, I
>>remember a quote from John I think being emphatic about that.
>>
>>I don't guess he was singling out women especially, I guess he meant
>>only the Beatles were going to sing on their records. And of course
>>there's some technical violations of that policy, like Revolution 9.
>
> And "Across The Universe" - and I'd hardly describe that as a
> techincal violation!
>

Lizzy Bravo and Gayleen Pease:
02/04/1968 (SUN 8:00pm until 2:00am 02/05/1968) Abbey Road Studios Studio
3. Recording: Across The Universe (overdub onto take 7, tape reduction
take 7 into take 8, overdub onto take 8, sound effects takes 1-3).
Producer: George Martin; Engineer: Martin Benge; 2nd Engineer: Phil
McDonald. Sixteen year old Brazilian Lizzy Bravo, and seventeen year old
Londoner Gayleen Pease, two "Apple Scruffs" are unexpectedly recruited from
the front of the Abbey Road Studios to add backing vocals to the song, the
first time female voices are recorded for a Beatle song.

[BeatleEd]

"who?" <yourimag...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

>
> I hear no orchestra on "Love you to." "Octopus's
> garden?" I'll have a listen.
>

Love You To (3:00)-
INSTRUMENTS PLAYED:
JOHN: Not Present
PAUL: Not Present
GEORGE: Double-tracked vocal
RINGO: Not Present
Outside Musicians: Anil Bhagwat, Tabla. Other session musicians.

On Octopus's Garden, well, that's my bad. Here's where I went wrong:
2/08/1969 (10:00am until 12:15pm 12/09/1969) Abbey Road Studio 2. Tape
copying with simultaneous re-recording of Ringo Starr's vocal, bass, lead
guitar and piano with __outside musicians__ (takes 1-10) for Ringo's
appearance on the show With A Little Help From My Friends. Producer:
George Martin; Engineer: Martin Benge; 2nd Engineer: Richard Lush.

No outside musicians on the Beatles version.

[Kachina]

I don't want nor need an apology. Just stop enabling the terrible twin twats. When you continually step into the line of fire, you're bound to take a few hits.

[who?]

Enable them how? By speaking to them?

When you continually step into the line of fire, you're bound to take a few hits.

Hey, go after me if it makes you feel better, because if you
want me to stop talking to them, I won't. (You talk to them
yourself.) A thread is a thread that anybody is allowed to
post to.

[Mack A. Damia]

I told you that you don't know yourself. You have an obtuse sense of
reasoning. Many folks in here have given up on you. You feel a need
to step into every flame, and you actually exacerbate matters. If you
would stick to music and The Beatles, this newsgroup would be far
better off.

You won't grasp this; the problem is inbred in your personality.

--

[Kachina]

On Monday, June 24, 2013 1:46:21 PM UTC-4, who? wrote:
> Enable them how? By speaking to them?

Crack a dictionary once in a while. You enable them by covering for them -- by chiding anyone who calls them out for their OT shitposting, e.g. "you don't have to read their posts, let them say what they want" -- followed by the obligatory "bravo/thanks for sticking up for me" responses from them.

You provide the cover, they feel empowered to continue.

[who?]

There's a lot of folks who don't like you. Why don't
you stick to music and the Beatles? I've never done
a damn thing to hurt you.

> You won't grasp this; the problem is inbred in your personality.

It's none of your fucking business who I talk to or what
I post about. What I do has "never" had anything to do with
you, so quit making it about you. On second thought I'll
just leave the group. You guys deserve each other. Good
luck. Happy flaming.

[zepf...@gmail.com]

On Sunday, June 23, 2013 8:19:45 PM UTC-5, ermitano wrote:
> El domingo, 23 de junio de 2013 19:00:29 UTC-4, zepf...@yahoo.com escribió: > Holy shit. If these many songs did employ a full piece orchestra, Beatles might be the most symphonic rock band ever... Even more so than Moody Blues and ELO those are songs employing 1 or more orchestral musicians, not the full orchestra necessarily

What are the Beatles songs to use a full piece orchestra?

[who?]

On Monday, June 24, 2013 1:00:38 PM UTC-5, Kachina wrote:
> On Monday, June 24, 2013 1:46:21 PM UTC-4, who? wrote:
>
> > Enable them how? By speaking to them?
>
>
>
> Crack a dictionary once in a while. You enable them by covering for them -- by chiding anyone who calls them out for their OT shitposting, e.g. "you don't have to read their posts,

You don't have to read their posts, and you're just as much a
part of the problem as you accuse me of. Flaming them is
what I'm talking about. They've been here for about 7 years
and they've never left.

let them say what they want" -- followed by the obligatory "bravo/thanks for sticking up for me" responses from them.

> You provide the cover, they feel empowered to continue.

You sure give me a lot of credit, after you post about
how stupid I am. You can't have it both ways.

[Kachina]

On Monday, June 24, 2013 2:05:21 PM UTC-4, who? wrote:

> On second thought I'll just leave the group.

Uh huh. See you tomorrow, if you can hold out that long.

[Mack A. Damia]

Q.E.D.

You're a sick puppy.

--

[Kachina]

On Monday, June 24, 2013 2:11:50 PM UTC-4, who? wrote:

> You don't have to read their posts, and you're just as much a
>
> part of the problem as you accuse me of. Flaming them is
>
> what I'm talking about.

Someone goes around constantly lighting OT fires, and the fireman is to blame. Right.

> They've been here for about 7 years
> and they've never left.

They? Fatass has been here for seven years, and she didn't come in the door screaming about Yoko and Muslims. She found a playmate in the moderated jewish group a couple years ago, who dutifully followed her here to cover her back while she posted anything she damn well pleased that had fuck-ALL to do with the Beatles. She can't hack it without her private cheering section. And you provide cover whether you realize it or not.

> You sure give me a lot of credit, after you post about
>
> how stupid I am. You can't have it both ways.

Helping her to continue pissing all over RMB for the last five years doesn't require high intelligence -- quite the opposite. It requires being clueless about your own actions.

[who?]

See, you don't even care if I leave the group cause when
I do, it will give you less to complain about. It will be
funny though, except for all the people you say you like.
They shouldn't like you so much because you've gone
so low to make fun of my head injury. That's very low
class and I'm warning them that they'll be next on
your shit list, and you're just here to cause problems
like last time. They haven't seen anything close yet
to what they'll see you do. You'll ruin this group.
I'm out of here unless I decide to respond to
Mack one last time. Enjoy your sewer.

[Kachina]

On Monday, June 24, 2013 2:06:02 PM UTC-4, zepf...@gmail.com wrote:
> What are the Beatles songs to use a full piece orchestra?

A Day In The Life

The End

There. There's your coveted list, Raja. Go add it to the pile.

[who?]

On Monday, June 24, 2013 1:26:35 PM UTC-5, Kachina wrote:
> On Monday, June 24, 2013 2:11:50 PM UTC-4, who? wrote:
>
>
>
> > You don't have to read their posts, and you're just as much a
>
> >
>
> > part of the problem as you accuse me of. Flaming them is
>
> >
>
> > what I'm talking about.
>
>
>
> Someone goes around constantly lighting OT fires, and the fireman is to blame. Right.
>
>
>
> > They've been here for about 7 years
>
> > and they've never left.
>
>
>
> They? Fatass has been here for seven years, and she didn't come in the door screaming about Yoko and Muslims. She found a playmate in the moderated jewish group a couple years ago, who dutifully followed her here to cover her back while she posted anything she damn well pleased that had fuck-ALL to do with the Beatles. She can't hack it without her private cheering section. And you provide cover whether you realize it or not.

No I don't. You've always played the victim and blame
other people for "your problems", and the current posters
haven't seen nothing yet. Wait till they do and they'll
wish they had never seen you.

> > You sure give me a lot of credit, after you post about
>
> >
>
> > how stupid I am. You can't have it both ways.
>
>
>
> Helping her to continue pissing all over RMB for the last five years doesn't require high intelligence -- quite the opposite. It requires being clueless about your own actions.

I haven't helped her do anything. I've suggested that
everybody just ignore them and start their own threads.
that's all I've said. It makes the most sense because I've
also spoken to them many times about what they talk
about and they continue to post. I've never talked about
Muslims or Jews to them, which is the biggest complaint,
right?

I give up. You just watch what happens, cause you'll
ruin this group. I have things to do. Good luck
in this sewer you're helping to create. You'll take
everyone down with you. Bye.

[who?]

The feeling is mutual. Bye.

[BeatleEd]

Define "full piece orchestra"

or·ches·tra
Noun

A group of instrumentalists, esp. one combining string, woodwind,
brass, and percussion sections and playing classical music.


Do we include the George Martin stuff on Yellow Submarine?

[Kachina]

On Monday, June 24, 2013 2:29:11 PM UTC-4, who? wrote:

> They shouldn't like you so much because you've gone
>
> so low to make fun of my head injury.

Interesting, since you've never admitted you had one. I ASSUMED you had received some sort of brain trauma because you mentioned seeing God several times, but you got indignant and never responded to my assertion. Your head injury brings me no joy, but thanks for proving my theory anyway. I might have been more delicate with you had I known that.

And now, you may make your grand dramatic exit from RMB forever, until tomorrow.

[ermitano]

full orchestra reminds me of those concerts for group and orchestra or something like that.
they never used orchestra in that way, just some songs, as BeatleEd said, that used several musicians from the orchestra

[who?]

On Monday, June 24, 2013 4:07:35 PM UTC-5, Kachina wrote:
> On Monday, June 24, 2013 2:29:11 PM UTC-4, who? wrote:
>
>
>
> > They shouldn't like you so much because you've gone
>
> >
>
> > so low to make fun of my head injury.
>
>
>
> Interesting, since you've never admitted you had one.

You are such a fucking liar. I made my announcement to this group
about 2 years ago. Go through the archives and you'll find it.
I told the story because I have people here who I consider friends,
and I wanted them to know that if I didn't respond to some posts,
or to go into certain detailed responses that they wouldn't feel
like I had snubbed them on purpose. I never expected someone
like yourself to use it against me.

I ASSUMED you had received some sort of brain trauma because you mentioned seeing God several times, but you got indignant and never responded to my assertion.

I never said I saw God, dammit. I said I felt his presence 4 times.
You can't ever get this part right.

Your head injury brings me no joy, but thanks for proving my theory anyway. I might have been more delicate with you had I known that.

You're going to fuck up this group so bad by flaming people
that you'll drive most people off. You'll find out yourself
that you can't control what people post, and you'll make
posters sick of you. But, I'm going to let you have your
way and get out of here since you are so determined to
make your point. Go for it. I wouldn't step back and leave
if it was anybody else besides you.

> And now, you may make your grand dramatic exit from RMB forever, until tomorrow.

See, right here you really don't want me to leave. You're
the kind of person who just loves to flame people, no matter
who it is. But, I've made my agreement with you so I'll
keep my word and not post here. Just wait though until
all the people that you've stated that you liked see what
kind of person you really are. Have a nice day.

[Kachina]

On Monday, June 24, 2013 6:15:52 PM UTC-4, who? wrote:
> On Monday, June 24, 2013 4:07:35 PM UTC-5, Kachina wrote:
>
> > On Monday, June 24, 2013 2:29:11 PM UTC-4, who? wrote:
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > > They shouldn't like you so much because you've gone
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > so low to make fun of my head injury.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Interesting, since you've never admitted you had one.
>
>
>
> You are such a fucking liar. I made my announcement to this group
>
> about 2 years ago. Go through the archives and you'll find it.

Like I knew that. I stop in here for a week every few months or so for the last few years, and I should know everything that's posted in the interim?

OK. I'm going to stop there, lest I forget what is causing you to lash out.

Here, this will calm your soul: after tonight, I won't be in RMB for a while. I only check in while I'm on vacation anyway. It will be safe. No Big Bad Wolf to go berserk on every poster I see, or whatever you imagine I do.

I recognize that an online social life means a great deal more to you than it does to me, so rest easy.

You'll be OK. Deep breath. Calm thoughts.

[who?]

On Monday, June 24, 2013 5:43:27 PM UTC-5, Kachina wrote:
> On Monday, June 24, 2013 6:15:52 PM UTC-4, who? wrote:
>
> > On Monday, June 24, 2013 4:07:35 PM UTC-5, Kachina wrote:
>
> >
>
> > > On Monday, June 24, 2013 2:29:11 PM UTC-4, who? wrote:
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > They shouldn't like you so much because you've gone
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > > so low to make fun of my head injury.
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > > Interesting, since you've never admitted you had one.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > You are such a fucking liar. I made my announcement to this group
>
> >
>
> > about 2 years ago. Go through the archives and you'll find it.
>
>
>
> Like I knew that. I stop in here for a week every few months or so for the last few years, and I should know everything that's posted in the interim?

You knew I had a head injury. You knew what the name of Fatts
other group that she posts in. You posted the link. You've been
here quite a lot.

>
> OK. I'm going to stop there, lest I forget what is causing you to lash out.

If I was lashing out, I would give out your personal information,
like you did to me a while back. I won't be so unkind to you.

> Here, this will calm your soul: after tonight, I won't be in RMB for a while. I only check in while I'm on vacation anyway. It will be safe. No Big Bad Wolf to go berserk on every poster I see, or whatever you imagine I do.
>
>
>
> I recognize that an online social life means a great deal more to you than it does to me, so rest easy.
>
>
>
> You'll be OK. Deep breath. Calm thoughts.

Thanks, but no thanks. It's not worth it.

[Kachina]

On Monday, June 24, 2013 6:58:24 PM UTC-4, who? wrote:
> If I was lashing out, I would give out your personal information,
>
> like you did to me a while back. I won't be so unkind to you.

OK, now I'm 110% positive you've gotten me confused with someone else. The "anonymous remailer" and "Danny knows who you are" comments a few days back were the first clue. I have never given out my identity to anyone in a newsgroup or public online forum, even in private email. Ever.

Here, I'll prove it: I hereby give you permission to post "my" personal information in RMB. If anyone contacts me in any way (other than using my junk email addy, which obviously everyone can see), I'll issue a public apology to you in this newsgroup and promise to never return to RMB in any form.

Deal? Deal.