Alice Cooper
Band
Beatles
Big Star
Black Sabbath
Blind Guardian
Byrds
Can
CCR
Coil
Current 93
Death
Deep Purple
Fall
Genesis
Godspeed You Black Emperor
Grateful Dead
Iron Maiden
Jimi Hendrix Experience
Joy Divison
Judas Priest
King Crimson
Kinks
Kraftwerk
Neurosis
Opeth
Os Mutantes
Pink Floyd
Porcupine Tree
Radiohead
Ramones
Rolling Stones
Rush
Slayer
Steely Dan
Stooges
Swans
Talking Heads
Ulver
VDGG
Velvet Underground
Who
Wire
Yes
Just for laughs, I tried the same "number-crunching" on that site's
all-time top 1000 which you pulled. It was a lot easier than I
expected, thanks to MS Word's text-substitution and sorting
capabilities.
Below are the acts which had three albums in the site's top 1000. I
make no effort to duplicate your dividing line between "bands" and
"not-bands," because it's completely inconsistent and nonsensical.
And I combined the not-band/band (?) incarnations of Frank
Zappa/Mothers of Invention, Iggy & the Stooges/Stooges and Bob
Marley/Wailers into single tallies.
Just to add an extra bit of info, I inserted the tallies of acts who
had *six* or more albums in the top 1000.
A Tribe Called Quest
Aerosmith
Al Green
Aretha Franklin
Beach Boys
Beastie Boys
Beatles [12]
Beck
Belle and Sebastian
Big Star
Björk
Black Sabbath
Blur
Bob Dylan [15]
Bob Marley/Wailers [6]
Brian Eno
Bruce Springsteen [8]
Byrds
Can
Captain Beefheart
Charles Mingus
Creedence Clearwater Revival
David Bowie [8]
Deep Purple
Doors
Ella Fitzgerald
Elliott Smith
Elvis Costello [8]
Elvis Presley
Frank Sinatra
Frank Zappa/Mothers of Invention
Genesis
Hüsker Dü
Jackson Browne
James Brown
Jimi Hendrix
John Coltrane [6]
John Lennon
Johnny Cash
Joni Mitchell
Kinks
Kraftwerk
Led Zeppelin [6]
Leonard Cohen
Lou Reed
Madonna
Marvin Gaye
Massive Attack
Metallica
Miles Davis [9]
Missy Misdemeanor Elliott
Neil Young [9]
New Order
Nick Cave
Nick Drake
Nirvana
Ornette Coleman
Otis Redding
OutKast
P J Harvey
Paul Simon
Pearl Jam
Pet Shop Boys
Pink Floyd
Pixies
Prince
Public Enemy
R.E.M. [8]
Radiohead
Ramones
Randy Newman
Replacements
Rolling Stones [11]
Roxy Music [6]
Simon and Garfunkel
Sly and the Family Stone
Smiths
Sonic Youth [6]
Steely Dan
Stevie Wonder
Stooges
Talk Talk
Talking Heads [6]
The Clash
The Cure
The Grateful Dead
The Jam
The Police
The Velvet Underground [6]
The Who [6]
Thelonious Monk
Tom Waits [6]
Traffic
U2 [6]
Van Morrison
Weezer
White Stripes
Wilco
Wire
XTC
Yes
Yo La Tengo
When you regard the names from your compiled list which are not on
this list, the warped slant of RateYourDeathMetal becomes obvious.
Gone: Alice Cooper, the Band, Blind Guardian, Coil, Current 93,
Death, the Fall, GYBE, Iron Maiden, Joy Division, Judas Priest, King
Crimson, Neurosis, Opeth, Os Mutantes, Porcupine Tree, Rush, Slayer,
the Swans, Ulver and of course Van der Craap Generator.
Acclaimed music is warped towards popular music. I think rym is much
more reliable. A band does not have to popular to be good. For example
VDGG, IMO one of the greatest bands of all time, they were never
popular. RYM does justice to them. And they are not death metal by any
means ;-)
Just say you hate death metal or are not bold enough to give them a
chance. I havent warmed up to death metal yet, but I am not ready to
dismiss it yet. I never dismiss anything without listening to it.
By the way from your list, there is only one death metal
band ...lol... and that is Death!
Blind Guardian is power meltal
Neurosis is sludge metal
Opeth is progressive metal
Slayer is thrash metal
Ulver is black metal (and tons of other genres like ambient, avant
garde)
And you think calling VDGG, Van der Crap Generator is funny, just
because I highly rate them... very juvenile... very juvenile indeed.
No but these are the type of bands critics KISS ASS to because they
were so weird and it makes them CRIDICKS looks cool.
> How many of the above names outsold Alice Cooper, Iron Maiden, Judas
> Priest, Rush and Slayer from the RateYourDeathMetal list?
You know none of these are death metal. Alice Cooper and Rush are not
even metal on that list.
>It's not
> an issue of "popularity," but of RYDM's unreliable slant toward
> certain styles and musical approaches.
And what that style would that be... would it be like Charles Mingus
and John Coltrane who completely dominate the list?
RYM is based on fan votes is free of any BIAS of any kind!
> It's a site for lonely dudes
> with long hair, chin beards and closets full of black band T-shirts.
Long hair like Charles Mingus?
> Very, very slanted. The dubious skew of a population group which
> rates names like Blind Guardian,
>Coil,
Beatles are closer to metal than Coil
> Current 93,
Beatles are closer to metal than Currrent 93
>Death,
>GYBE,
Beatles are closer to metal than GYBE
> Neurosis, Opeth, Os Mutantes, Porcupine Tree,
Dude Porcupine Tree try to sound like Floyd who were million miles
away from metal.
>the Swans,
Swans = metal? Are you nuts?
>Ulver and
> VDGG
VDGG could blow Slayer off stage. But they were not metal.
>among the very top bands of all time couldn't be more obvious.
> You probably wouldn't even tout the site yourself, except you love
> that its users rate VDGG so highly.
VDGG is not the only band I like.
>
> > I think rym is much more reliable.
>
> I just showed you why it isn't.
No you didnt.
>
> You don't actually believe it's more reliable. You just love that
> it's all about dorky lists and statistics, and has rankings which
> are much more prog/rockband-oriented than the norm.
>
I hate prog rock by the way. Yes is the only prog rock band I like. I
think King Crimson is very inconsistent, Genesis is boring and ELP are
power trio assholes! And I wpuld rather listen to my fart than listen
to Ian Anderson's voice.
> > By the way from your list, there is only one death metal
> > band ...lol... and that is Death!
>
> > Blind Guardian is power metal
> > Neurosis is sludge metal
> > Opeth is progressive metal
> > Slayer is thrash metal
> > Ulver is black metal (and tons of other genres like ambient, avant
> > garde)
>
> Oh yes, important distinctions here.
Defintiely. You need to know the differnence between Ambient (Ulver)
and Thrash metal (Slayer). Both are opposite ends of the spectrum.
>
> RateYourMusic is a lousy resource for most topics.
It is fan rated website. The most reliable, devoid of some asshole
critic who likes one type of music.
That is my opinion. You are saying my opinion is superficial. it
doesnt make sense.
>
> First you charge that the critics lean too much toward popular music.
>
Yes they do.
> Now you charge that they lean too much toward weird, "cool" music.
Yes they do... cool music which fall under the umbrella of alt rock
(especially punk). Critics have always been biased to this genre.
>
> No consistency at all. You're just emptily naysaying.
>
> Stop bullshitting. You're burying yourself in your own feces.
Thats nonsense. Critics are kiss ass to British Invasion, Classic Rock
(that doesn include hard rock/heavy metal) and Punk/Alt bands. Thats
all I am saying.
>
> > > How many of the above names outsold Alice Cooper, Iron Maiden, Judas
> > > Priest, Rush and Slayer from the RateYourDeathMetal list?
>
> > You know none of these are death metal. Alice Cooper and Rush are not
> > even metal on that list.
>
> "RateYourDeathMetal" is a flip kissoff which you take far too
> seriously/literally. And I don't think you're so stupid that you
> can't see the site's slant.
What is this slant? Many rap/classical/jazz/electronic albums are
highly rated there
>Stop pretending that an interest in
> Alice Cooper and Rush "clashes" with the mentality of someone
> metal/hard-rock oriented.
You have a hard time believing that hard rock/metal can be good. That
is your problem. You are narrowminded, not me. If you look at my
tastes it ranges from all genres between pop to heavy metal.
>
> And of course, you entirely avoided answering my question. Weak.
Which question? You are on a blamathon. You just can't believe that I
can have a different opinion than you.
>
> > > It's not
> > > an issue of "popularity," but of RYDM's unreliable slant toward
> > > certain styles and musical approaches.
>
> > And what that style would that be... would it be like Charles Mingus
> > and John Coltrane who completely dominate the list?
>
> Saying they "completely dominate the list" isn't even close to
> accurate.
Yes they do.
http://rateyourmusic.com/list/cathcacr/most_albums_in_the_rym_top_1000/
They are 2nd and 3rd on the list before Miles Davis who is another
jazz musician. Ooooh the death metal slant. You are making yourself
stupider than ever. And you feel depressed about it. Since I am the
one who is stupid IN YOUR MIND.
> And even if it was, the Acclaimed Music list doesn't show
> any unreasonable slant toward jazz. I gave you a list of 102 names,
> and just six of them were jazz
Acclaimed Music is a puke list... It hardly dvelves deep, sticking too
the cridicks kissass artists.
>. And all major, major names. Not out
> of proportion. Go on, stop your idiotic posturing and try to pose an
> substantial argument which contends Miles, Mingus, Coltrane, Monk,
> Ornette Coleman and Ella Fitzgerald made weaker contributions to
> music than Blind Guardian, Coil, Current 93, Death, GYBE, Neurosis,
> Opeth, Porcupine Tree and Ulver.
Are you are a moron. See the list for fuck's sake
>
> > > among the very top bands of all time couldn't be more obvious.
> > > You probably wouldn't even tout the site yourself, except you love
> > > that its users rate VDGG so highly.
>
> > VDGG is not the only band I like.
>
> Yes, we know. You like a dozen or so other bands too. Impressively
> diverse, yes.
Yes.
>
> > > You don't actually believe it's more reliable. You just love that
> > > it's all about dorky lists and statistics, and has rankings which
> > > are much more prog/rockband-oriented than the norm.
>
> > I hate prog rock by the way. Yes is the only prog rock band I like.
>
> Oh, that's right...because VDGG is actually "proto-punk," or some
> such nonsense.
Prog rock is a BS term anyway. Most of the bands called prog rock dont
even sound the same. There is zero overlap between Yes and VDGG by the
way.
>I've also seen you endorse Radiohead, GYBE and
> another post-rock band or two, which are typical modern names which
> prog-oriented fans enjoy.
I dont endorse Radiohead at all. GYBE is okay. Not really
entertaining. Prog oriented lol... dont insult those bands.
>
> > I think King Crimson is very inconsistent, Genesis is boring and ELP are
> > power trio assholes! And I wpuld rather listen to my fart than listen
> > to Ian Anderson's voice.
>
> But you also shun all "solo" acts and only like "bands," which is a
> big step in this direction.
I havent heard solo acts that much. I can tell you I find David Bowie,
Neil Young, Springsteen and Dylan incredibly boring.
>
> > > Oh yes, important distinctions here.
>
> > Defintiely. You need to know the differnence between Ambient (Ulver)
> > and Thrash metal (Slayer). Both are opposite ends of the spectrum.
>
> You mean opposite ends of the tiny spectrum of dark, underground
> metal? You're bullshitting again. Post something real. It's more
> interesting, that way.
You need to listen to them to see the difference before opening your
mouth and making an ass of yourself.
>
> > > RateYourMusic is a lousy resource for most topics.
>
> > It is fan rated website. The most reliable, devoid of some asshole
> > critic who likes one type of music.
>
> Bullshitting again. You can't make any specific attacks on that
> critics-based list, because it's too difficult for you to dispute.
Here I dispute it. Cridicks list are biased to popular classic rock
acts and alt/punk acts.
> So, just more of the generalized dismissals which are the
> bread-and-butter of Usenet idiots. You know the list I gave you
> contained many types of music, but you bullshit this objection
> anyway.
>
> The only faint criticism of the Acclaimed Music site I would make is
> that the lists/polls chosen for its calculations make the site
> slightly UK-biased. Bands like Blur, Massive Attack, New Order, the
> Pet Shop Boys, Talk Talk, the Smiths, the Jam and Roxy Music seem a
> little overrepresented, as a result. But that's nothing compared to
> the ridiculous bias of RateYourMusic.
Acclaimed list is moronic and utter garbage... see above.
Let me guess, poisoned rose, these are the artists you havea problem
with. Why are these band exactly that highly rated on RYM? To be
frank, I am not sure. I havent heard these bands that much either. May
be they are good, they might be worth checking out. Unfortunately you
are not adventurous but I am!
> Blind Guardian
A german power metal (power metal has a lot of keyboards and is
anthemic and epic unlike other metal formats) band from what I know. I
had heard one of their albums. Wasnt impressed at all. But it was not
their best album. I need to give them a try.
> Coil
Havent heard a single song. Supposedly an experimental electronic
band. Not even rock!
> Current 93
Havent heard a single song. Supposed to be folk and experimental
> Death
Death metal. One of my friends who likes death metal played some of
their songs long back. I didnt get it then, I doubt I will get them.
But I wanna check them out before I dismiss them. 100 death metal fans
can't be wrong ;-)
> Neurosis
Verstile band supposedly. Havent heard a single song yet.
Experimental, Post-metal, Sludge metal , Doom metal, Progressive
metal, Hardcore punk (early)
> Opeth
Scandanavian Progressive metal/Progressive death metal. I have heard
one of their albums. Was decent but it is not their best album. Have
to hear their best album. I have heard the best new metal is coming
from Scandanavian countries. Thats what the metal fans say.
> Os Mutantes
Psychedelic Brazilian bands from the 60s. I havent heard this band at
all.
> Swans
No clue about this band. Supposedly avantgarde...I think I heard one
of their songs long back. Was scared... didnt get back to them.
> Ulver
They are unclassifiable, supposedly. Havent heard a single song yet.
Wiki says....
Ulver (Norwegian for "wolves") is a multi-disciplinary musical group
from Norway. Since their first, folklore-influenced black metal
release in 1992, Ulver's style has ever been changing by mixing
elements of experimental, electronic and ambient music, avant-garde
rock, trip hop.
Sounds interesting...
I hope you are young enough to explore more... instead of being a
bitch ;-)
So you only heard 2 of the 8 bands on the list and call yourself
versatile? ... LOL. I know your type... you can't tolerate satanic
heavy metal. They bleed your ears to death or you are too Christian
for that...bwahahahahaha!
I may go ahead and try all the 8 bands SERIOUSLY in a month or so when
I get time. But you never well. Since you are damn prejudiced!
> A list of bands
You're a brain-dead dipshit, fuck off Raja.
And none of these bands feature predominantly on the main list (i.e.
all time list). Nice try to divert the topic, by the way. I am trying
to have a discussion by the way. If you are hellbent on proving YOU
WIN, you are wasting my time. It is not a I win/You Lose situation
here.
And none of them are extreme metal (black metal, death metal etc). I
knew it. You are too Christian for that ...I bet those lyrics about
mutilation, rape, sodomy and brutality scares you... hehe
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Its a rating's website. Overall ratings keep changing. Hence yearly
ratings dont matter at all. Look at the all time list. That is much
more stable.
>
> And actually, your above statement is not even correct. Ulver is #54
> on the all time list. Neurosis is #57. Porcupine Tree is #67. That's
> "predominant" enough for me.
>
Thats not predominant by any means. Porcupine Tree is not metal at
all.
> RYM's all-time list also includes telltale names such as:
> Candlemass, Nevermore, Isis, Carcass, Sepultura, Arcturus, Blind
> Guardian, Mercyful Fate, Agalloch, Dream Theater, Pain of Salvation,
> Emperor, Maudlin of the Well, Death and Opeth. Sure...who wouldn't
> rank those bands among the top 179 of all time? Bias? What bias?
>
> You know there's a strong slant here. It's laughably obvious. Why do
> you pretend otherwise?
>
> > And none of them are extreme metal (black metal, death metal etc). I
> > knew it. You are too Christian for that ...I bet those lyrics about
> > mutilation, rape, sodomy and brutality scares you... hehe
>
> You are a very silly boy. First off, you can find plenty of "ugly"
> music in that list I posted. For instance, gruesome names such as
> Unexpect, the Dead C., Battle of Mice, Sleepytime Gorilla Museum,
> Sunn 0))), Teenage Jesus & the Jerks, Lightning Bolt, Stolen Babies,
> Wolf Eyes, the Locust, the Book of Knots (one of my favorite
> discoveries of this year) and various Mike Patton projects jump out
> at me. Second, why do you pretend to have familiarity with more than
> a smattering of those names? It's so tedious arguing music with
> phonies who don't have the knowledge to argue specifics and instead
> just take "superior" poses based on lazy, mass dismissals.
>
> But, let me get this straight: You make empty promises about
> investigating eight bands of a similar type in the future, and this
> makes you more "adventurous" than someone who has already explored
> hundreds of bands during the past couple of years? Because all that
> matters is exploring "black metal"?
>
> You are such a poseur. You won't even investigate those eight bands.
> You'll just re-play your classic-rock CDs and search the Web for
> more lists.
You have completely chosen to ignore extreme metal because of your
prejudice. Thats not versatile enough for me. I never claimed to be
completely versatile - mainly because I havent got a chance to listen
to all the artists. I am much younger than you and I started listening
to rock music just around 6 years ago.
And you never responded to my comment. Probably because what I said is
true.
You spend an awful amount of time arguing IN DETAIL over something you
are never gonna agree. If that what you like, good for you. Adios.
Thanks for your time ;-)
Raja, that's all it's ever been for you. Seriously, you project like
no one I've never known.
Nobody cares but you, Raja. Can't you come up with some other way to
whack off? Maybe one that doesn't involve you leaving, coming back,
posting lists, arguing about those lists, leaving again, posting but
not really being back, and generally just never going the hell away?
Just wondering.
> Nobody cares but you, Raja. Can't you come up with some other way to
> whack off? Maybe one that doesn't involve you leaving, coming back,
> posting lists, arguing about those lists, leaving again, posting but
> not really being back, and generally just never going the hell away?
>
> Just wondering.
Yeah, go ahead, people! Just keep bitching about Raja, telling him to
fuck off over and over again, and generally giving him all the attention
he could possibly want. It's *bound* to drive him away, sooner or later!
Oh, wait ...
--
--Sean
http://spclsd223.livejournal.com/
[Cuddy walks in]
House [to Chase]: What, you've got her on speed dial?
Cuddy: I just follow the scent of arrogance.
It did once, at least for a short period.
>> Yeah, go ahead, people! Just keep bitching about Raja, telling him to
>> fuck off over and over again, and generally giving him all the attention
>> he could possibly want. It's *bound* to drive him away, sooner or later!
>>
>> Oh, wait ...
>
> It did once, at least for a short period.
Bitch, or give him attention?
Drive him away.
>>> It did once, at least for a short period.
>>
>> Bitch, or give him attention?
>
> Drive him away.
That was a good ten minutes.