Ladies : Who Is The Sexiest Beatle ???
LGGsNmrl
With all due apologies to fans of The Cute Beatle (and he is "cute"), the
SEXIEST Beatle is...
George.
Why? He's just my "type." Skinny and goofy. But he's a Dark Horse, too.
There's something in his eyes. His eyes hold secrets. And, he likes
Monty Python almost as much as I do.
Although, obviously, I wouldn't have kicked any of them out of my bed for
eating crackers.
Yours sincerely, wasting away,
Lisa (she's not a girl who misses much)
* * * * *
Find beauty in the banal, for it is everywhere. --Mark McKinney
* * * * *
DreamSkate
that nice mouth. And he has such nice hair. Just overall attractive.
ESRICH01
Jeff Carty
>
>Attention ladies, which Beatle do you think is the sexiest, and why?
Again, the question is poorly stated. See my response to Adam under
his thread "Who is the sexiest Beatle wife". The phrasing quietly
assumes that all women here might necessarily be interested in the question
or have a comment, and that all men here would of course not.
Personally, though I am gay and always have been, for some reason I have
never found any of the Beatles sexy. Paul was definitely the cutest. But
sexy? *Any* of them? Errrrrr.....not! :-) But then, most straight men
really aren't all that sexy. At least to me. They like to think they're
sexy, but....most aren't.
Jeff
Kateling
of the Beatles over my many moons of Beatle fanship.
There was always something a little too plastic about Paul, though.
Something a little too, oh, I don't know, manufactured.
Victoria Croce
something in the way he smiles (no pun intended) that is a
big turn on. I think that smiles and eyes are the sexiest
part of a man and he has them both.
Jordan Voelker
he appeared in the Blue Shirt shot, last scene of yellow Submarine), and,
well, I don't know if sexy is the word to describe John but _hey_, john
is.. John, after all.
"Le reve est une seconde vie." -Aurelia
Phil Miller
: Personally, though I am gay and always have been, for some reason I have
: never found any of the Beatles sexy. Paul was definitely the cutest. But
John looked his best during the early years; George looked his best
during the '65 through pre-India period (I guess the enlightened
loose their sex appeal ;-) ); Ringo, well ... I guess you've got
to dig for the right picture; Paul is overrated, but he seemed to
peak as his music did, from '67 to '71.
: sexy? *Any* of them? Errrrrr.....not! :-) But then, most straight men
: really aren't all that sexy. At least to me. They like to think they're
: sexy, but....most aren't.
Ah, are we being jealous?
philll
Vanessa Meachen
>
>Attention ladies, which Beatle do you think is the sexiest, and why?
Definitely George.
Danee Bramhall
mentioned but also his cute tush and i'm not saying this because he looks
like you simon my love...because you look like him.
Deborah Jo Mott
John. Without a doubt.
Those bedroom eyes, that sexy, half-closed look.
And the voice....well....do I have to go there?
Dj
ps...Paul is "cute". John was "foxy"! Major difference there.
JedEBull1
Jennifer L. White
short pouffy hair and moustache days, he looked pretty damn swell. Above
all, he was sexy because he emanated a mix of intelligence and good humor
that is pretty rare. Although I have to admit he got pretty humorless at
one point. But anyway, all in all, John takes this one. I have to say
that ever since I was a little girl (which wasn't *that* long ago, I'm
only 20) I've thought that he was exactly my type. So there.
--
Jennifer Randomly Selected Frank Zappa
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Quote of the Day:
Everybody's got something to hide "Now imagine a Moebius vortex inside
except me and my monkey. J.Lennon a spherical constant, and you've got
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX my cosmology."
Linda J. Anderson
writes:
>Paul-if you can't see why then you need glasses.
John - if you can't see why then you must be celibate.
Libby Moore
he has gorgeous hair (and I think he is easily the sexiest today--I hope
I could look so good at his age!), John is sexy because of his intellect
and depth, George's spirituality is sexy, and Ringo's charm, and
personality also make HIM sexy too!
Libby
"We'll all be looking for changes... changes in the way we treat our
fellow creatures". - Paul McCartney
Jeff Carty
Don't understand the reference. Jealous of what, exactly?
Jeff
M.R. Roddey
>short pouffy hair and moustache days, he looked pretty damn swell. Above
I disagree!!!!! His Sgt. Pepper look was among his best! I loved that
moustache on him, and I loved the clothes and stuff they were all wearing
around then. John always looked the best, and is by far the sexiest
Beatle (Paul's too sickeningly sweet/pretty boy-ish).
Monica
T. Fitzhugh
I wasn't going to respond to this one but after seeing it here day after
day I can't resist putting my 2cents in.
George is IMHO the sexiest Beatle by far. The standard reasoning is that
he's darker and more mysterious. I agree whole heartedly!! The only
period I would have to digress from my opinion is the Sgt. Pepper phase in
which George looks too scruffy for words. Here, John takes the cake as
sexiest Beatle. But that phase doesn't last long and once again George
reclaims the title. Enough said.
Theresa
IM4FAB4
LGGsNmrl
Does anyone else think that George would have made a great vampire? It's
his dark eyes and those wonderful incisor teeth of his! Man, he could've
burst into my room in the middle of any night and nibbled on my neck!
OK. I now return you to my regularly scheduled adulthood.
Servicios Corporativos, S.A.
desirable creature in the world (execpt duringin that beard period, of
course).
Eugenia
"Stamp your hand and clap your feet"
John Lennon
Servicios Corporativos, S.A.
sarah bodah
: I just couldn't pass up replying to this.
: With all due apologies to fans of The Cute Beatle (and he is "cute"), the
: SEXIEST Beatle is...
: George.
: Why? He's just my "type." Skinny and goofy. But he's a Dark Horse, too.
: There's something in his eyes. His eyes hold secrets. And, he likes
: Monty Python almost as much as I do.
HAHA! I definitely agree! When I heard George's film company produced
Life of Brian, I almost died! I guess another reason I love George is
his spirituality. I'm very spiritual, although in a different way.
Still, you gotta love a man with SOUL!
Sarah
--
"...it's only me it's not my mind that is confusing things..."
--George Harrison
Aditiisfun
Yeah, he might be a little pretty-boyish, but just watch him sing
Yesterday and Hey Jude on Anthology and tell me you don't find him
attractive!!!
Velcro
TSI...@dekalb.net
Alia
writes:
>Is there anybody else who thinks Paul is by far the best-looking
Beatle?
>Yeah, he might be a little pretty-boyish, but just watch him sing
>Yesterday and Hey Jude on Anthology and tell me you don't find him
>attractive!!!
yup there is someone else... i'd go out with Paul any day! (or any one
of the Beatles for that matter. but especially Paul)
being 15 years old, i think i was born in the wrong generation...
--Heather
Bonnie Mcclory-finn
voices I've ever heard. John stopped looking sexy after Yoko neutered him,
psychologically speaking, that is.
EWalker711
the sexiest years? (Besides now, of course). How about in Help during
the Another Girl video? How about the Revolution video, or the Hey Jude
video? How about the Shea Stadium concert??? The White Album 8x10
glossy? Oh well, could go on and on..... Let's hear it for Paul
LADIES!!!!
Katie Trame
HMVNipper
for that brief period near the end of the group's days (i.e., when he was
strung out on God knows what) when he wasn't
particularly...um...managing...his appearance (i.e., not washing his hair,
for instance!) he was pretty damn hot!
'nuf said!
Pokyd
others! Yes, I'm sure there are plenty of us...my faves include many of
the photos in the first McCartney album, along with the "Night Before"
segment in HELP! because of his cute tush. The eyes have it in his case
but the rear view ain't bad either! Yeah!
Cindy Winkler
Yeah, John was a handome devil alright. I have a Greek fisherman's hat
like he used to wear. I would wear it to school, but the other kids
would snatch it off and play frisbee with it. :) Anyway, I would like to
have John as a friend, but not a boyfriend. As a rule, I don't care for
men with long hair and beards, so I prefer the early Beatles to the later
Beatles. Of course, everyone knows that George Harrison is God's gift to
All which is Wonderful and Kind.
Cindy Winkler
>
> We Paul fans just don't feel the need to shout it I guess, as much as the
> others!
I do think you are referring to me, and my cries of love for sexy,
handsome George Harrison.
Yes, I'm sure there are plenty of us...my faves include many of
> the photos in the first McCartney album, along with the "Night Before"
> segment in HELP! because of his cute tush. ^^^^
Paul's ass is *FAT*! Paul is *FAT*! In that movie he is *FAT*! George
was portrayed as an airhead in "Help!", but the reason is this: George is
Pure. I'm not positive how long he was a Virgin, but it was a very long
time. Unlike the other Beatles George Can do No Wrong. John didn't
pretend to be Pure, but Paul and Ringo *did* pretend! Paul was a big
phony! Anyway, purity denotes innocence, which denotes ignorance, which
denotes stupidity. That is the *only* thing I have to say against
George. Anyone who couldn't graduate from high school and has no O
levels can't be too brainy. But I adore him anyway.
The eyes have it in his case
> but the rear view ain't bad either! Yeah!
*sigh* George's eyes are way prettier than Paul's. George has no ass.
And he's not a slick phony.
Tommy Lenz
his big brown puppy dog eyes had his own sense of sex appeal. George had
that quiet brooding sex appeal. Paul was also had big cow eyes. Each
one of them could have eaten crackers in my bed on any given night.
Ringo and John more than one!!!!
Love is Real
Jonna
Libby Moore
^^^^
> Paul's ass is *FAT*! Paul is *FAT*! In that movie he is *FAT*!
Paul is NOT fat!!!! I think he is VERY attractive!
George
> was portrayed as an airhead in "Help!", but the reason is this: George is
> Pure. I'm not positive how long he was a Virgin, but it was a very long
> time. Unlike the other Beatles George Can do No Wrong.
Huh? George was helping himself to all the delights in Hamburg
right along with the others, I'm pretty sure. He wasn't blind.
Or a saint.
I like George, too, but why must we pit them one against the
other?
>Anyone who couldn't graduate from high school and has no O
> levels can't be too brainy.
I think George is smart enough... you can't write the
beautiful songs he has and be stupid.
Libby
--
IamJLennon
the eyes. That says it all.
Heather Dorsey
that all four of them aren't absolutely adorable! Just because Paul faked
his innocent look, doesn't mean he wasn't gorgeous! Of course, John was
my favorite before he got the long hair, and grew out his fringes. I
don't care for the guys with the long hair. George was pretty hot, in a
spiritual way. Ringo had those great eyes. I probably wouldn't push any
of them out of bed.
--
"You think I'm soft in the head, well try someone softer instead!"
Heather Dorsey
hea...@durandal.res.cmu.edu
http://durandal.res.cmu.edu/~heather/Beatlepage.html
Cindy Winkler
>
> In <4kcp6v$23...@useneta1.news.prodigy.com> QBE...@prodigy.com (Tommy
> Lenz) writes:
> >
> >yes i agree John practically oozed sex all over the place but Ringo
> >with his big brown puppy dog eyes had his own sense of sex appeal.
>George had that quiet brooding sex appeal. Paul was also had big cow
> >eyes. Each one of them could have eaten crackers in my bed on any
> >given night. Ringo and John more than one!!!!
> >
> >
> >Love is Real
> >Jonna
Cindy (who thinks Ringo needed a nose job)
Tommy Lenz
reply.
won't let it happen again. But Ringo and John still get my votes.
real is love
jonna
Mk622
cutest. Check out his eyes -- you'll see what I mean. You just want to
hug him all the time, especially in "A Hard Day's Night." He's so
lovable!
Gary Shultz
I agree with you. The eyes are awesome. So are his sense of humor and
charm. M Shultz
Eleanor Rigby
I have always thought Paul was just the plain cutest, but some photos of
John in Harry Benson's book ,"The Beatles In the Beginning" made me
realize how handsome and charismatic John was. Benson also considered
John the best looking, Paul the 'cute one', said George was "nice looking
too", and that Ringo was so popular and received the most fanmail because
"women thought they had a better chance with Ringo. It had to be that."
That kind of thing would really tick me off if it was about *my* band and
my friends. I know a lot of this sort of thing was written. It must have
resulted in a large ego for Paul, and bouts of insecurity for the rest.
Kerry
Agresearch.cri.nz
In article <Pine.ULT.3.91.960502...@rac10.wam.umd.edu>,
to say that Ringo's baby blues win my vote every time.
Cherry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: The above is a personal opinion and does not reflect the
official view of AgResearch Ltd.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Katherine Gail
Well, I'd say Paul is cute and SEXY! I'd want to bring him to
parties and dances to make my friends jealous.
John is classically handsome and I'd want to bring him to the
symphony, the opera, and social parties to make a good impression (as long
as he doesn't SAY anything -- don't get me wrong, I LOVE John's dry
humour, but some of his barbs would get me in trouble :-)).
George is the sort that you could stare at all day -- good-looking
in an introspective type of way -- and I'd love to have him for rainy days
and when I have the urge for someone to LISTEN (not knowing if he listens
well or not -- I'm just going by looks, here).
Ringo is not handsome and he is not necessarily cute -- my mother
goes so far as to say he's ugly. However, I love his face in an
unexplainable way. He is cute, even though he's not good-looking in the
generally accepted way (sorry I'm not making sense, and please don't take
my ramblings the wrong way). I would love to have Ringo for everyday wear
and tear. He's the sort who would make you laugh and would be the ultimate
friend. I can imagine going to the movies with Ringo, playing Monopoly and
Checkers, and having a good laugh with him.
All in all, I personally think Paul is the sexiest looking, but
it depends on what mood I'm in. Please don't blame me for being shallow,
but I was only saying what I felt about their LOOKS, not their minds,
creative ability, etc. Anyway, hope you enjoy one woman's point of view :-).
Katherine
--
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
KATHERINE GAIL
kg...@peabody.jhu.edu
Peabody School of Music - Johns Hopkins University
Bachelors of Music - Violin Performance
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*
And we all shine on, like the moon and the stars and the sun.
-John Lennon
d-max
Well, here I'd have to put my vote in for Mr. George Harrison. I thought
he was especially handsome during the Sgt. Pepper sessions, and he even
looks good now, and it's strange for me to be looking at older guys. I'd
say he improved with age. Also, I think George would be good to talk to,
and he's rumored to be very sweet and not just a little sensual between
the sheets. And though I hate to sound like a shallow slut (I'm not!),
has anyone else taken a good look at that man and noticed that he is
HUNG?! I'm not kidding!
Any man who can write a love song like "Something" and appreciate Monty
Python has to be okay.
d-max (yes, a girl! The secret is out!)
Lisa
In article
<d-max-14059...@user-168-121-85-70.dialup.mindspring.com>,
d-...@chatt.mindspring.com says...
>
>Well, here I'd have to put my vote in for Mr. George Harrison.
slight snip here...
>And though I hate to sound like a shallow slut (I'm not!),
>has anyone else taken a good look at that man and noticed that he is
>HUNG?! I'm not kidding!
Actually, I hadn't noticed...in fact, what is a "hung"?
If you mean "hunk"...I personally wouldn't characterize George that way
at all.
Lisa
Steve A. Porter
Lisa wrote:
>
>
> >And though I hate to sound like a shallow slut (I'm not!),
> >has anyone else taken a good look at that man and noticed that he is
> >HUNG?! I'm not kidding!
>
> Actually, I hadn't noticed...in fact, what is a "hung"?
> If you mean "hunk"...I personally wouldn't characterize George that way
> at all.
>
> Lisa
Uh, Lisa, is your post serious?
****sporter****
just gimme some truth
Steve A. Porter
Carl Christensen wrote:
>
> On Tue, 14 May 1996 21:40:39 +0200, d-...@chatt.mindspring.com (d-max)
> wrote:
> >has anyone else taken a good look at that man and noticed that he is
> >HUNG?! I'm not kidding!
>
> for his vegetarian lunch! ;-)
>
> Carl Christensen
--
I don't know. Remember the name "Dark Horse"? Horse-as in hung like a
horse-and dark as in -well you know what they say about dark meat.
Carl Christensen
On Tue, 14 May 1996 21:40:39 +0200, d-...@chatt.mindspring.com (d-max)
wrote:
>has anyone else taken a good look at that man and noticed that he is
>HUNG?! I'm not kidding!
It was just a cucumber wrapped in foil he kept stuffed in his trousers
for his vegetarian lunch! ;-)
Carl Christensen /~~\_/~\ ,,, For music fun in Windows
E-mail: ca...@netaxs.com | #=#==========# | download alcomp11.zip
C/C++/Delphi/VB Consultant \__/~\_/ ``` at a popular FTP site!
Catch my WWW page at --> http://www.netaxs.com/~carl
Mysterious Cavity
On 15 May 1996, Lisa wrote:
> In article >
<d-max-14059...@user-168-121-85-70.dialup.mindspring.com>, >
d-...@chatt.mindspring.com says... > > > >Well, here I'd have to put my
vote in for Mr. George Harrison. > > slight snip here... > > >And though I
hate to sound like a shallow slut (I'm not!), > >has anyone else taken a
good look at that man and noticed that he is > >HUNG?! I'm not kidding!
Whoa! George is hung! Damn I will have to look closer next time :)
Personally I have a thing for Paul., thuogh Ringo always has a special
place in my heart :)
Nicole
d-max
In article <319A28...@students.wisc.edu>, Jennifer Darling
<jdar...@students.wisc.edu> wrote:
snip
> > >And though I hate to sound like a shallow slut (I'm not!),
> > >has anyone else taken a good look at that man and noticed that he is
> > >HUNG?! I'm not kidding!
> >
> > Actually, I hadn't noticed...in fact, what is a "hung"?
> > If you mean "hunk"...I personally wouldn't characterize George that way
> > at all.
>
> Oh, dear. Who's gonna volunteer to explain this one?
Okay, it was my post so I'll explain it- HUNG as in he's got a really big,
um, wait . . . go ask your mother, and tell her you don't want any stork
crap!
By the way, this isn't the only reason I like George so much! He's got
the most beautiful eyes as well.
d-max
Noelle 678
I would have to that that is hard decision, isn't it, ladies? Paul is a
cutie, Ringo is also cute and George writes beautiful love songs, and is
also cute. As for John, I would say he is the cutest, although I don't
think so when he has long hair and that bushy beard (he looks like my
father like that!) Anyway, ultimately, over all the years, I'd say Paul
has always been beautiful!!!!
Noelle
John Hopkin
Jennifer Darling <jdar...@students.wisc.edu> wrote:
>Lisa wrote:
>>
>> In article
>> <d-max-14059...@user-168-121-85-70.dialup.mindspring.com>,
>> d-...@chatt.mindspring.com says...
>> >And though I hate to sound like a shallow slut (I'm not!),
>> >has anyone else taken a good look at that man and noticed that he is
>> >HUNG?! I'm not kidding!
>>
>> Actually, I hadn't noticed...in fact, what is a "hung"?
>> If you mean "hunk"...I personally wouldn't characterize George that way
>> at all.
>Oh, dear. Who's gonna volunteer to explain this one?
>Jennifer D.
Who else but? It means he's got a big dick, luv.
jhopkin
Roger Wiseman
cr...@ovnet.com (Crow(Roger Wiseman))
#(:)o] | MiSTie # 15126
________________________________________________________
Guitarist | The Beatles are #1 !!!!! | Jeet Kune Do/Kung Fu stylist @)
"Love is the answer..." John Lennon
" Mind Games" ©1973 Lennon Music/ATV Music Corp./BMI
Mitchell Heldt
>Okay, it was my post so I'll explain it- HUNG as in he's got a really
big,
>um, wait . . . go ask your mother, and tell her you don't want any stork
>crap!
Hey, that reminds me, does anyone know if the story of the infamous
plaster casts is true, and, if so, what happened to them?
Julie
Scott & Lisa Mader
It is absolutely true but I never heard that she casted the Beatles (I'm
sure she's not doing it now as Cynthia Plaster Caster must be pushing 50
if she's still alive). Not to mention, there is an old KISS song called
"Plaster Caster."
Lisa (Halifax, NS)
Joe Caldwell
Lisa Mader wrote:
>
> It is absolutely true but I never heard that she casted the Beatles (I'm
> sure she's not doing it now as Cynthia Plaster Caster must be pushing 50
> if she's still alive).
I resemble...er...resent this statement! There's at least one reguler poster on r.m.b,
having recently turned 50, that is *still* alive...sort of...I think. ;-)
--
- Joe Caldwell
yell...@ebicom.net
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
"I want a love that's right
But right is half of what's wrong"
- George Harrison
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
David Fell
In article <31A6F1...@atcon.com>, Scott & Lisa Mader
<slm...@atcon.com> wrote:
>It is absolutely true but I never heard that she casted the Beatles (I'm
>sure she's not doing it now as Cynthia Plaster Caster must be pushing 50
>if she's still alive). Not to mention, there is an old KISS song called
>"Plaster Caster."
I met Cynthia several times about 15 years ago. She never mentioned the
Beatles. Another reference: Jim Croce's "Five Short Minute" includes the
line "casted me in plaster while I sang her a tune."
--
--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
= David Fell | Writer of Important Things =
- Chicago, Illinois | All-Around Great Guy -
= fe...@interaccess.com | http://homepage.interaccess.com/~fell/ =
--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Scott & Lisa Mader
Ooops! Sorry, didn't mean to offend, but you know what those crazy
drug-addled 1960's were like (not that everyone in the 60's did drugs).
Lisa (Halifax, NS)
PS: I'm only 27 so perhaps I shouldn't be talking about this!
Susan Juliano
In article <31A6F1...@atcon.com>,
Whatever *did* happen to the Plaster Casters of Chicago? They were incredibly
famous, as groupies go, they took their work very seriously (even handed out
business cards), and they kept diaries. Yet the only thing I've ever read
about them was from an ancient Rolling Stone book called _Groupies and Other
Girls_. Cynthia had said that she'd like to open a museum. Last I heard,
Frank Zappa's production company had invited her to California, but that was
a long time ago. Has nothing survived of their legacy? And wouldn't those
things be a great addition to the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame? Or can you
imagine seeing them in Hard Rock Cafes around the world? Mind boggling. But I
would certainly settle for a book of their experiences... a nice illustrated
coffee-table book for shocking the family. ;-)
===========================================================
Susan Juliano <sjul...@moose.erie.net> "We all shine on." -John Lennon
John Hopkin
Joe Caldwell <yell...@ebicom.net> wrote:
>Lisa Mader wrote:
>>
>> It is absolutely true but I never heard that she casted the Beatles (I'm
>> sure she's not doing it now as Cynthia Plaster Caster must be pushing 50
>> if she's still alive).
>I resemble...er...resent this statement! There's at least one reguler poster on r.m.b,
>having recently turned 50, that is *still* alive...sort of...I think. ;-)
>--
>- Joe Caldwell
>yell...@ebicom.net
And who would that be, Joe?
jhopkin
finney
If you're talking about the woman who did casts of many rock group
"members", I read an interview of her (in Village Voice, I think) a few
years ago. Sorry, I can't recall her name or the status of the casts.
tc (who has way too much free time on
this Memorial Day)
Immirage
Paul all the way!!!
Then George....
USENET News System
From: dem...@natlab.research.philips.com (David Demery)
In <4o83b7$m...@news.erie.net> sjul...@moose.erie.net (Susan Juliano) writes:
>Whatever *did* happen to the Plaster Casters of Chicago? They were incredibly
>famous, as groupies go, they took their work very seriously (even handed out
>business cards), and they kept diaries. Yet the only thing I've ever read
>about them was from an ancient Rolling Stone book called _Groupies and Other
>Girls_. Cynthia had said that she'd like to open a museum. Last I heard,
>Frank Zappa's production company had invited her to California, but that was
>a long time ago. Has nothing survived of their legacy? And wouldn't those
>things be a great addition to the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame? Or can you
>imagine seeing them in Hard Rock Cafes around the world? Mind boggling. But I
>would certainly settle for a book of their experiences... a nice illustrated
>coffee-table book for shocking the family. ;-)
Cynthia `Plaster-caster' has been in several music publications lately
relating the story of her `statuettes'. Apparently she has been
embroiled in some dispute with ex-Frank Zappa manager Herb Cohen for
some time -- apparently she had entrusted the casts to him for safe
keeping, and he didn't want to give them back. (Remember, FZ was none
too fond of Herb's business practices either!) Cynthia now has them,
and is planning on exhibiting them (some photos were included with the
articles: Hendrix was one, naturally!).
For some details on how the Plaster-casters operated, check Zappa's
The Real Frank Zappa Book.
Dem
John Hopkin
>Cynthia `Plaster-caster' has been in several music publications lately
>relating the story of her `statuettes'. Apparently she has been
>embroiled in some dispute with ex-Frank Zappa manager Herb Cohen for
>some time -- apparently she had entrusted the casts to him for safe
>keeping, and he didn't want to give them back. (Remember, FZ was none
>too fond of Herb's business practices either!) Cynthia now has them,
>and is planning on exhibiting them (some photos were included with the
>articles: Hendrix was one, naturally!).
>Dem
How many pages did he take up?
jhopkin
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Actual dialog from Baywatch:
Mitch: What are the odds of her surviving inoperable cancer?
C.J. : I'll go find out!
http://durandal.edrc.cmu.edu/~heather/Secret/secretpage.html
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
alara...@gmail.com
loonag...@gmail.com
NezMonkee Love
the most masculine looking Beatle even though he was the shortest.
Ringo definitely had the sexiest speaking voice and giant, luscious
lips. George was only sexy with his clothes on, unfortunately. :( They
all probably smelled and tasted like booze and tobacco, though.
apol...@gmail.com
On Monday, March 18, 1996 at 3:00:00 AM UTC-5, LGGsNmrl wrote:
> I just couldn't pass up replying to this.
>
> With all due apologies to fans of The Cute Beatle (and he is "cute"), the
> SEXIEST Beatle is...
>
> George.
>
> Why? He's just my "type." Skinny and goofy. But he's a Dark Horse, too.
> There's something in his eyes. His eyes hold secrets. And, he likes
> Monty Python almost as much as I do.
>
> Although, obviously, I wouldn't have kicked any of them out of my bed for
> eating crackers.
>
>
>
> Yours sincerely, wasting away,
> Lisa (she's not a girl who misses much)
>
> * * * * *
> Find beauty in the banal, for it is everywhere. --Mark McKinney
> * * * * *
Janita Poe
> Definitely Ringo. Maybe no one agrees with me, but he was just the
> cutest. Check out his eyes -- you'll see what I mean. You just want to
> hug him all the time, especially in "A Hard Day's Night." He's so
> lovable!
I agree! Ringo was adorable and he's aged like fine wine.
Rye Reid
Of the four Beatles was the sexiest / cutest/ etc.? Even straight men today feel more confident in
their masculinity to offer an opinion. I am a gay man, so I definitely have an opinion!
In their early days with talent and youth to draw on, when the dressed alike and wore identical hairdos,
It would be difficult for me to say; except I could say that Ringo was always distinctive looking.
Paul had those fat cheeks, the round face, and slits for lips that definitely puts him out of the running
as the best looking of the four, even Ringo. Those fat chipmunk cheeks, and those huge round eyes,
like a Margaret D.H. Keane painting, while whimsical and adorable in her painting of children, are
about as sexy as her subjects. But to each their own! Yeah? For me Pauls sex appeal hung solely on his
talent. I might possibly be able to get past his big round head if I met him in person.
John was talented and cerebral, and that is definitely sexy! But the drugs, and the grungy period he
and Yoko went through, when they posed naked, front and back, for that iconic poster was, frankly,
ugly; enough to turn a gay man straight. Of course had I met him in person I’ve no doubt I would
have found him extremely sexy, because he knew who he was, what he believed, and man enough
to stand by his convictions. He was not a great looking man, even after he cut his hair and cleaned up.
George was, in my humble gay opinion, the best looking of all the Beatles. He had a great jaw line, great
cheek bones, thoughtful eyes, in conjunction with his taciturn nature, made him both sexy and handsome.
He could have been Joe Schmo on the street and I would have invited him home and into my bed. The other
Joe Schmo’s, John, Paul, and Ringo would need their talent, their youth, and their money to entice me.
Nil
rec.music.beatles:
> This is the 21st century!
Norbert K
I hear you on John's grungy/drug/Yoko period. It turns *me* off as a fan. Your line about this phase being "enough to turn a gay man straight" made me chuckle.
George, you say? Interesting.
Thanks for posting!
Sofia P
As a nineteen-year-old woman who is tired of facing George slander in my real life - everyone I show him to says he's gangly and weird-looking and trash his unibrow (can you believe?!) - I feel compelled to use this as an outlet for my 'GeorgeGeorgeGeorge' brain right now.
He's absolutely gorgeous (Georgeous?).
He fits all my subjective standards for attractiveness: I love tall, rail-thin men; dark hair; a strong jawline; prominent, even severe cheekbones (George is all in the cheekbones); a heavy brow bone and thick eyebrows; dark, hooded, and expressive eyes; well-shaped lips, with a fuller lower lip; and ears that stick out. I love his arms and hands too, especially while he plays. And his little goofy dances, laugh, and obsession over guitars! And his habits of constantly licking his lips and flipping his hair are...distracting.
Of course, intellect, humour, creativity, a sense of self, and charisma don't hurt. I'm glad George has a brain between those adorable ears - his music and personality (inasmuch as I can grasp it from videos/written accounts) are at least half of what makes him attractive. If he hadn't, I'd have to admit how shallow I am: he'd still be leagues sexier to me than any other man, certainly the other Beatles. He's the one with the most 'present' or 'forward' sexuality for me: Ringo being more affable and sweet, Paul being more boyish, and John always concealing something of himself through the self-defense of caustic wit. George is at once as sexually young and unassuming as he is self-possessed and beguiling.
But the most captivating things about George: his smile and his voice. He always had the most unique, beaming smile, especially before he got cosmetic surgery on his 'fangs', and it showed off his dimples! I go completely weak for British accents, but the beautiful tone and slow cadence of George's voice draws me in more than the others'. I adore his singing voice too; I think his early vocal performances on Hamburg bootlegs and the BBC recordings are so fantastic and underappreciated.
He could have easily been a model. Not only for his looks, but for the way he could always find an interesting pose for a photo, wear clothes with such confidence (they never 'wore him', despite his lean frame), and capture the camera with his eyes. Even in candid shots, you can see there's something lithe, even artistic, about his movements and posture.
The man radiates intensity and sex. I think it's his Scorpio rising. :)
Norbert K
Joe Mahoney
> I just couldn't pass up replying to this.
> With all due apologies to fans of The Cute Beatle (and he is "cute"), the
> SEXIEST Beatle is...
> George.
> Why? He's just my "type." Skinny and goofy. But he's a Dark Horse, too.
> There's something in his eyes. His eyes hold secrets. And, he likes
> Monty Python almost as much as I do.
> Although, obviously, I wouldn't have kicked any of them out of my bed for
> eating crackers.
> Yours sincerely, wasting away,
> Lisa (she's not a girl who misses much)
> * * * * *
> Find beauty in the banal, for it is everywhere. --Mark McKinney
> * * * * *
Sofia P
> This is a wonderful piece of writing. You have made your case -- with style to spare. Keep posting; we need contributors like you.