Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
The Beatles 9 min and 38 seconds worth, (long version) of "Flying"
109 views
Skip to first unread message
Jeff
Nov 3, 2012, 1:09:17 AM11/3/12
to
Nil
Nov 3, 2012, 9:38:26 AM11/3/12
to
On 03 Nov 2012, Jeff <yourimag...@yahoo.com> wrote in
rec.music.beatles:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6yTY__PKLDQ&feature=watch-vrec
I've always loved "Flying". It's groovy in the nicest sense of the word
- very relaxed and actually does make me think of lazily flying. Lovely
instrument sounds. I don't think the 7 minutes of mellotron noodling
adds much, but I kind of like that, too. I'm a bit of a mellotron nut;
its sound fascinates me.
rec.music.beatles:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6yTY__PKLDQ&feature=watch-vrec
I've always loved "Flying". It's groovy in the nicest sense of the word
- very relaxed and actually does make me think of lazily flying. Lovely
instrument sounds. I don't think the 7 minutes of mellotron noodling
adds much, but I kind of like that, too. I'm a bit of a mellotron nut;
its sound fascinates me.
who?
Nov 3, 2012, 10:46:40 AM11/3/12
to
On Nov 3, 8:38 am, Nil <redno...@REMOVETHIScomcast.net> wrote:
> On 03 Nov 2012, Jeff <yourimageunre...@yahoo.com> wrote in
I hadn't ever heard this long version until moments before
posting it here. After the mellotron noodling, I was hoping
it would take me back to the beginning of the song at
some point, and it didn't go there, so It was disappointing.
> On 03 Nov 2012, Jeff <yourimageunre...@yahoo.com> wrote in
posting it here. After the mellotron noodling, I was hoping
it would take me back to the beginning of the song at
some point, and it didn't go there, so It was disappointing.
ermitano
Nov 3, 2012, 1:49:14 PM11/3/12
to
who?
Nov 3, 2012, 2:30:19 PM11/3/12
to
play.
:-)
Eric Ramon
Nov 3, 2012, 4:12:15 PM11/3/12
to
On Nov 2, 10:09 pm, Jeff <yourimageunre...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6yTY__PKLDQ&feature=watch-vrec
thanks. This is more interesting to me than Shirley's Accordion.
Imagine if this had been the actual release! It would be on some
people's lists along with Rev #9. But it's a good listen, one time
only. As mentioned before, I sort of wish Hey Jude had been 3 minutes
long. It would have been great if the single were 3 minutes and then,
like this one, we finally heard the long version this week!
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6yTY__PKLDQ&feature=watch-vrec
thanks. This is more interesting to me than Shirley's Accordion.
Imagine if this had been the actual release! It would be on some
people's lists along with Rev #9. But it's a good listen, one time
only. As mentioned before, I sort of wish Hey Jude had been 3 minutes
long. It would have been great if the single were 3 minutes and then,
like this one, we finally heard the long version this week!
ermitano
Nov 3, 2012, 4:20:32 PM11/3/12
to
RichL
Nov 3, 2012, 4:56:13 PM11/3/12
to
"Eric Ramon" <ramon...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:d9619260-5528-4d88...@g7g2000pbi.googlegroups.com...
Well, I for one think it's much more interesting than #9, for reasons
similar to Nil's.
news:d9619260-5528-4d88...@g7g2000pbi.googlegroups.com...
similar to Nil's.
who?
Nov 3, 2012, 7:09:28 PM11/3/12
to
Beatles released of Hey Jude that was a little over 4
minutes long? It was discontinued and never made it to
CD. Anyhow, if you have a stand alone CD burner,
(a recording studio would work too) or a real to reel
machine, it's very easy to fade out Hey Jude where
ever you want the fade out to be.
who?
Nov 3, 2012, 7:13:02 PM11/3/12
to
long that I'm aware of. There was a longer version that
was released on a bootleg, but this is about twice as long.
Have a listen and you'll see what I mean.
ermitano
Nov 4, 2012, 3:06:39 PM11/4/12
to
Jeff
Nov 6, 2012, 6:28:38 AM11/6/12
to
booted version.
0 new messages