Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Paul McCartney's address

66 views
Skip to first unread message

Ash2284

unread,
Feb 3, 1995, 10:03:13 PM2/3/95
to
Does ANYONE know Pual McCartney's mailing address? I would really love to
have it. E-mail me if you know it please?
Ashley Harris (screen name
Ash2284)

Let Me Take You Down..................

Paul Kelsey Wheeler

unread,
Feb 4, 1995, 7:41:07 PM2/4/95
to
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I don't think anybody's going to be too inclined to tell you where the
man lives if you end your message with "Let Me Take You Down".
Anybody else shudder when they saw that?

--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Paul Wheeler [pwh...@leland.stanford.edu]
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Walters, Gina

unread,
Feb 5, 1995, 10:08:30 AM2/5/95
to
In <3h16r3$m...@elaine38.Stanford.EDU> pwh...@leland.Stanford.EDU writes:

> In article <3guqph$p...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, Ash2284 <ash...@aol.com> wrote:
> >Does ANYONE know Pual McCartney's mailing address? I would really love to
> >have it. E-mail me if you know it please?
> > Ashley Harris (screen name
> >Ash2284)
> >
> >Let Me Take You Down..................
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> I don't think anybody's going to be too inclined to tell you where the
> man lives if you end your message with "Let Me Take You Down".
> Anybody else shudder when they saw that?

YES! I felt the same way. It was very eirie (however you spell that)...it
made me think you REALLY don't know who is on the net. No offense Ashley.

David Coyle

unread,
Feb 5, 1995, 3:15:13 PM2/5/95
to
>> In article <3guqph$p...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, Ash2284 <ash...@aol.com> wrot
>e:
>> >Does ANYONE know Pual McCartney's mailing address? I would really love to
>> >have it. E-mail me if you know it please?
>> > Ashley Harris (screen name
>> >Ash2284)
>> >
>> >Let Me Take You Down..................
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> I don't think anybody's going to be too inclined to tell you where the
>> man lives if you end your message with "Let Me Take You Down".
>> Anybody else shudder when they saw that?
>
>YES! I felt the same way. It was very eirie (however you spell that)...it
>made me think you REALLY don't know who is on the net. No offense Ashley.

-- Hold on a sec, here -- am I missing something?? What's the deal with the
song line Ashley quoted, and why is it jangling so many nerves?? Is there
something about it that implies this Ashley person is up to no good? If someone
quotes "Catcher in the Rye" in their signature line, then maybe I would worry
about their intentions... But come on...

BTW, I saw a mystery novel in a store yesterday called "God, Jesus and
Coca-Cola" or something like that. One of the quotes on the back of the book
said "This is a 'Catcher in the Rye' for the 90's, and it doesn't make you want
to kill a Beatle."

"Nothing to get hung about..."
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
--
******************************************************************************
* DAVID J. COYLE *
* 22 University Terrace #306 847 Washington Ave. *
* Athens, OH 45701-2915 Chillicothe, OH 45601 *

DrRobert64

unread,
Feb 6, 1995, 8:30:02 AM2/6/95
to
Ashley, The reason these people are hassling you about lyrics and stuff is
simply--- they don't know Paul's address.
Steve Miller (DrRob...@aol.com)

Dani Barnard

unread,
Feb 6, 1995, 10:07:17 AM2/6/95
to
Excerpts from netnews.rec.music.beatles: 6-Feb-95 Re: Paul McCartney's
address by DrRob...@aol.com

> Ashley, The reason these people are hassling you about lyrics and stuff is
> simply--- they don't know Paul's address.
> Steve Miller (DrRob...@aol.com)


That's not true. I know it, and I opted not to give it to her before
anyone else posted :)

Andrew Eordogh

unread,
Feb 6, 1995, 10:40:56 AM2/6/95
to
In article <3h16r3$m...@elaine38.Stanford.EDU>, pwh...@leland.Stanford.EDU
(Paul Kelsey Wheeler) wrote:

> In article <3guqph$p...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, Ash2284 <ash...@aol.com>
wrote:
> >Does ANYONE know Pual McCartney's mailing address? I would really love to
> >have it. E-mail me if you know it please?
> > Ashley Harris (screen name
> >Ash2284)
> >
> >Let Me Take You Down..................
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> I don't think anybody's going to be too inclined to tell you where the
> man lives if you end your message with "Let Me Take You Down".
> Anybody else shudder when they saw that?

Yeah, you know what happened the last time some looney found a Beatles' address

---------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew Eordogh <Some assembly required> Sydney, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------

David Eric Prokopy

unread,
Feb 6, 1995, 11:24:18 AM2/6/95
to
David Coyle <dc33...@oak.cats.ohiou.edu> writes:
>-- Hold on a sec, here -- am I missing something?? What's the deal with the
>song line Ashley quoted, and why is it jangling so many nerves??

_let me take you down_ was the title of a book written a couple of years ago
about lennon's assassin.

one could read into that phrase (as the author obviously did) that "take
you down" could also mean to kill someone.

--
<*> dave prokopy <*> (temporarily) david....@launchpad.unc.edu <*>
<*> "today there is no black or white/ only shades of gray" -mann/weil <*>
<*> check me out <*> http://www.wam.umd.edu/~sheph/dave.html <*>
--
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Launchpad is an experimental internet BBS. The views of its users do not
necessarily represent those of UNC-Chapel Hill, OIT, or the SysOps.
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Debby Nowicki

unread,
Feb 6, 1995, 11:38:24 AM2/6/95
to
I think we should all calm down. If someone
wanted to kill Paul, I would think they would
already know where to go for it. Besides, I'm
sure he has tight security; at least I hope he
does.

Aaron Bucky

unread,
Feb 6, 1995, 3:47:18 PM2/6/95
to
In article <3h5ifi$u...@bigblue.oit.unc.edu>,

David....@launchpad.unc.edu (David Eric Prokopy) wrote:

> David Coyle <dc33...@oak.cats.ohiou.edu> writes:
> >-- Hold on a sec, here -- am I missing something?? What's the deal with the
> >song line Ashley quoted, and why is it jangling so many nerves??
>
> _let me take you down_ was the title of a book written a couple of years ago
> about lennon's assassin.
>
> one could read into that phrase (as the author obviously did) that "take
> you down" could also mean to kill someone.

Nobody seems to realize that this person may have been (and probably was)
simply and innocently quoting one of John Lennon's greatest songs.
Everyone has been ranting and raving about how this person must be some
sort of maniac, when they haven't even met her. Isn't it a bit insulting
to make inferences like this about someone based solely on a .sig file? I
once had someone decide I was crazy based on my old .sig file. The thing
about "friend to caped superheroes and wizards" caused him to assume I was
living in some sort of dream world and had no contact with reality; he
thought I really believed that those imaginary beings were my friends. He
proceded to send me several insulting e-mail messages. Please, let's not
treat this person that way. She's not the one who killed John Lennon, so
stop blaming her.

--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Aaron "Yes, I _do_ change my .sig from time to time" Bucky
"Arthur." --George Harrison (abu...@haverford.edu)
Gm7add11 "Give us a kiss." --John Lennon
EADGBE "Well, no, actually we're just friends." --Paul McCartney
353533 "It's my active compensatory factor." --Ringo Starr

EgwEimi

unread,
Feb 7, 1995, 11:46:02 AM2/7/95
to
The line "Let me take you down" is incomplete. The full line is
"Let me take you down to Strawberry Fields." "Cause I'm going" is
the reason, which is interjected into the sentence.

FD

Jon Peck

unread,
Feb 7, 1995, 1:02:50 PM2/7/95
to

Dunno if there's any deep significance to this, but one early demo
version I heard a bit of has John singing it as "let me take you back"
rather than "down."

Jon Peck
Tallahassee, FL
j...@legal.firn.edu

saki

unread,
Feb 7, 1995, 7:59:53 PM2/7/95
to
In article <3h803o$1...@newsbf02.news.aol.com> drrob...@aol.com (DrRobert64) writes:
>I agree, I think they were giving her a hard time to cover up the fact
>they don't have Paul's address! : )
>
>Well, I can proudly state without beating around the bush---- I DON'T HAVE
>IT EITHER, and don't give a flying f---. ;)

Well, heavens...it's not that big a secret. :-) At least his business
address, which is: MPL, 1 Soho Square, London W1 England.

There are some nice little restaurants in the neighborhood, should you
find yourself in the area, and some even nicer used record shops nearby.
--
-------------------------------------
"I guess by now you've got the gist".
--------------------------------------------------------------------
sa...@evolution.bchs.uh.edu (saki)

DrRobert64

unread,
Feb 7, 1995, 9:29:12 AM2/7/95
to
I agree, I think they were giving her a hard time to cover up the fact
they don't have Paul's address! : )

Well, I can proudly state without beating around the bush---- I DON'T HAVE
IT EITHER, and don't give a flying f---. ;)

Steve Miller (DrRob...@aol.com)

saki

unread,
Feb 8, 1995, 7:07:55 PM2/8/95
to
In article <Pine.SCO.3.90.95020...@legal.firn.edu> Jon Peck <j...@legal.firn.edu> writes:
>On 7 Feb 1995, EgwEimi wrote:
>
>> The line "Let me take you down" is incomplete. The full line is
>> "Let me take you down to Strawberry Fields." "Cause I'm going" is
>> the reason, which is interjected into the sentence.
>
>Dunno if there's any deep significance to this, but one early demo
>version I heard a bit of has John singing it as "let me take you back"
>rather than "down."

Diagramming the sentence so strictly might obscure the metaphorical
meaning, which I've always taken to mean the singer wants to invite
the listener down/backwards/wherever to his past, specifically his
childhood...or a type of innocent netherworld where "nothing is real".

The invitation is less a strict reference to Strawberry Field(s) itself,
which is a real place near John's boyhood home, than it is to a journey
away from the present and "down" to this special retreat. The imperative
immediacy is implied too---let me take you *now* because I'm going to
this fabulous place, etc. As such, I don't have any problem seeing
two independent sentences (Let me take you down/I'm going to Strawberry
Fields) linked by "because"; i.e., because I'm leaving right now, let
me take you with me.

Have I muddled this sufficiently yet? If not, I can suggest a grand
Chomskyan deep structure, for all you linguistics fans out there. :-)

Aaron Bucky

unread,
Feb 8, 1995, 9:10:56 PM2/8/95
to

I beg to differ. I don't think it's "Let me take me down, 'cause I'm
going, to Strawberry Fields." That's not the way John sings it, and if he
had wanted to write "Let me take you down to Strawberry Fields 'cause I'm
going there" (or a more musical way of phrasing same) he would have. I
think he sings " Let me take you down, 'cause I'm going to Strawberry
Fields." "I'm going to S.F." is the reason for "me" to "take you down,"
rather than "I'm going" being the rationale for "Let me take you down to
S.F."
Okay. Is that convoluted enough for everyone? :-)

Michael Pierrie

unread,
Feb 9, 1995, 11:47:41 AM2/9/95
to
Aaron Bucky (abu...@haverford.edu) wrote:
: Isn't it a bit insulting

: to make inferences like this about someone based solely on a .sig file? I
: once had someone decide I was crazy based on my old .sig file. The thing
: about "friend to caped superheroes and wizards" caused him to assume I was
: living in some sort of dream world and had no contact with reality; he
: thought I really believed that those imaginary beings were my friends. He
: proceded to send me several insulting e-mail messages.

I *liked* that old .sig file of yours! I thought it was cute!

Raenna Peiss
--
"Turn me on, dead man."
- Yentraccm/Nonnel

Aaron Bucky

unread,
Feb 9, 1995, 10:33:21 PM2/9/95
to
In article <3hdgvd$b...@lastactionhero.rs.itd.umich.edu>,
n...@set.umd.umich.edu (Michael Pierrie) wrote:

I thought so too. The person I'm talking aboutevidently didn't; he sent
me a series of messages, the first one with just an insult and no
explanation. Others, in response to my requests for an explanation,
followed, all highly insulting. Somebody out there was looking for
someone to blame for the problems of his life (whatever those might have
been). The moral of this story is "There is no place on Earth without
schmucks."

ObBeatles: I listened to "Live at the BBC" again today. It helped me
survive through 65 lines of Homeric Greek.

saki

unread,
Feb 10, 1995, 7:17:43 PM2/10/95
to

>ObBeatles: I listened to "Live at the BBC" again today. It helped me
>survive through 65 lines of Homeric Greek.

It's been my experience that "Revolver" adds a nice gloss to Plato and
Herodotus goes better with the Traveling Wilburys.

--
"...These youngsters from Liverpool, and their conduct over here, not only
as fine professional singers but as a group of fine youngsters, will leave
an imprint on everyone over here who's met them."
------------------------------------------------sa...@evolution.bchs.uh.edu

Alexander M Tanter

unread,
Feb 10, 1995, 9:58:13 PM2/10/95
to
In <3h588q$d...@newsbf02.news.aol.com> drrob...@aol.com writes:


MPL's address used to be 12-13 Greek St., London. That was a while ago, so
I don't know if that's still correct. The way the British postal system
works, you can actually send a letter to "Paul McCartney, living somewhere near
Rye, East Sussex" and it will eventually get to wherever his letters go. I
assume he has a private mailng address only his friends know, but the British
post office prides itself on getting mail to anyone, no matter how poorly
addressed it is!!

Marcy Tanter


Aaron Bucky

unread,
Feb 11, 1995, 2:18:12 PM2/11/95
to
In article <3hgvn7$2...@masala.cc.uh.edu>, sa...@evolution.bchs.uh.edu
(saki) wrote:

> In article <abucky-0902...@s164.union_roberts.haverford.edu>
abu...@haverford.edu (Aaron Bucky) writes:
>
> >ObBeatles: I listened to "Live at the BBC" again today. It helped me
> >survive through 65 lines of Homeric Greek.
>
> It's been my experience that "Revolver" adds a nice gloss to Plato and
> Herodotus goes better with the Traveling Wilburys.

Well, I haven't ever taken a Plato class (though I did Herodotus last
semester), and I don't have any of the Wilbury's albums at this time. But
thanks for the advice anyway.

Aaron Bucky

unread,
Feb 11, 1995, 2:31:12 PM2/11/95
to
In article <3hh945$p...@nic.umass.edu>, TAN...@OITVMS.OIT.UMASS.EDU
(Alexander M Tanter) wrote:

I believe they prefer it if it has a proper Postcode, though (equivalent
of American ZIP code). At least, they did when I was there. And what are
the chances that Paul actually reads all his fan mail? Though if you want
to try, go right ahead.

Leslie E. DesMarteau

unread,
Feb 12, 1995, 2:31:40 PM2/12/95
to
saki (sa...@evolution.bchs.uh.edu) wrote:

Actually I've found Live at the BBC to go nicely with Xenophon, though
switching over to Latin I prefer Please Please Me with Sallust :)
Leslie

Adam Bucky

unread,
Feb 13, 1995, 2:58:10 PM2/13/95
to
In article <3hlnms$b...@emerald.tufts.edu>, ldes...@emerald.tufts.edu
(Leslie E. DesMarteau) wrote:

"Revolver" or "Pepper" with Catullus, of course. The White Album would
go nicely with Ovid; but Plato doesn't really go very well with music at
all; he must be pored over with intense (almost obsessive) concentration.

-Adam

"xyrein leonta e sykophantein Thrasymachon..."

0 new messages