So the question then becomes, What KIND of freakin fish did we come
from?? What kind o fish did YOU usta be?? If we was cat's, it would
be easy. Cuz they usta be catfish. And dogs usta be dogfish
naturaly. But last time ole MC checkered, their was no such friggin
THING as a goddam MANFISH!! (Annif their was, I sure as heck never
cottim. Cuz like, if I caught a fish, and then he start talkin to me
in English, I'd ploppim back in the ole goddang drink!! I'd say "Your
off the hook lil buddy. Now go forf and ebolbe. Mebbe next time I
see's ya, ya'll be a fully blowed man, with two dicks and a cock!!)
Anyways, I been wondrin and thinkin, what kind o fish did I usta be??
Then it donned on me. I musta been a Big Mouth Bass!! Cuz, as you
can see from how offins I post, I got one helluva big freakin mouth!!
And why bass?? Well, cuz it rhymes with ass, and as you can prolly
imagines, I got myself one great big wobbly ass but. Also as you may
or may not know, I love the Yoke, and she got quite a biggole dumpy
pair o buttocks herself.
Nuff said
You really get off on being Charlie's bitch, huh?
Shut the frik up you goddam TROLL. I ain't NOBODYS bitch....nobody
cept the Yoke that is...Say, wouldya liketa hear bout the time I
touched her hand and almost met her?? No, its the other way round.
Wanna hear??
The guy hasn't posted here in years, yet you're totally owned by him.
Truly pathetic.
YOUR the one whos PATHIC ya goddang TROLL!! Ain't nobbody owns ole
MC. NOBODY. Looky here, I met the Yoke an you dint. I met Clint
Eastwood and you dint. I smoke more reefage and drink more malt licka
in a DAY then you did in your LIFE. And its just a DAY in my freakin
LIFE, LOL :-)
What it comes down to is, Im the presdent of RM firkin B an you
aint.
Your jealouus.
And envious.
And in awe.
You cant post as much as me. Nobbody can. Thats how come Im prsdent.
Nobbody butt nobbody owns ole MC.
Cept the firkin Yoke.
Nuff said
A monk(ey) fish.
I believe that "Shaved Fish" referred to Yoko's bald private parts
(now there's a vision to behold). By stating that he came from fish,
he was referring to that fact that he came out of his mother's hole.
LOL!
I have seen a copy of a sketch of said private parts done by John as
part of his Bag 1 set . . . . but it was a hairy sketch. Never seen a
bald one.
Either way, it could be classified as one of the great wonders of the
world. It's a wonder that any man would take the plunge.
Never heard of it..but I gottan idear ifya wanna go fishin fer
one...use bananananas fer bait!! LOL! :-)
So then what was the "dead fish" he said he lived offa in the Playboy
intaview??
Sure he took the plunge...the man's John Lennon fer Godsakes!! Not
zackly some cowidly lion ifya ask me. Specialy after a few hits o
acid. The man would do anything fer Chrissakes. Lookit him nude on
Two Virgins...that is ifya can takeyer eyes offa the Yoke...which I
never can...not without a good wank anyways :-)
Yoko's privates.
I loved John, but if you really consider this an "exposure" of Darwinian
"fraud" then you're not too bright. John was full of rather inane, or
paranoid, or just outright dumb ideas, and this fits the last category
pretty well, discounting any humor that was intended. Darwin - first off
- didn't say man "came from monkeys" but only that apes and men shared a
common ancestor. Furthermore, that common ancestor also descended from
something, which - as any high school student not drunk, high or inept
would know - would be one-celled and aquatic creatures. In between - as
any high school student worth their soup could tell you - fish. So - the
thing is we are descended from BOTH a common ancestor with apes AND
(further back) fish. So John's statement might be amusing in a "I didn't
really do much in high school except draw and write nonsense" sort of
way, but as a "exposure" of Darwin - beyond pathetic.
dmh
Thats your oppinion not fact.
> John was full of rather inane, or
> paranoid, or just outright dumb ideas,
subjective
> and this fits the last category
> pretty well, discounting any humor that was intended. Darwin - first off
> - didn't say man "came from monkeys"
Yes he did, and it was a goddang LIE!!
> but only that apes and men shared a common ancestor.
semantics.
> Furthermore, that common ancestor also descended from
> something,
Correctimundo. Fish.
> which - as any high school student not drunk, high or inept
The gratuitous attacks are quite unbecoming of you.
> would know - would be one-celled and aquatic creatures.
Source?
> In between - as
> any high school student worth their soup could tell you - fish.
You sayin high school students aint worth nuthin more than a big ole
plate a fish soup?? Thats your oppinion.
> So - the
> thing is we are descended from BOTH a common ancestor with apes AND
> (further back) fish.
Fish yes, apes no.
> So John's statement might be amusing in a "I didn't
> really do much in high school except draw and write nonsense" sort of
> way,
Its also amusing in a "genius" sort of way.
> but as a "exposure" of Darwin - beyond pathetic.
Thats your oppinion. Not fact.
> dmh
Source?
Uh no - it IS a fact. It is NOT my opinion that if a person thinks
saying we descended from fish rather than monkeys is a solid argument
against Darwinism then that person is ignorant of Darwinian theory and
thus of what might form a reasonable critique of that theory. It's no
different than my saying that a person who says gravity is made of bread
crumbs simply doesn't understand either gravity or bread crumbs. And -
to make the point (the fact) clearer, I go on at length to explain why
saying "humans are evolved from fish" is not only not a solid argument
against evolutionary thought, but actually is supporting evidence. Not
merely an opinion, but a logical elucidation of a series of facts. No
matter what what actually thinks of Darwin or his ideas, the truth is
the argument as spoken by John simply fails to be a lucid critique.
>
>> John was full of rather inane, or
>> paranoid, or just outright dumb ideas,
>
> subjective
I might give you that. But I think the record speaks for itself here:
John said a lot of rather silly things.
>
>> and this fits the last category
>> pretty well, discounting any humor that was intended. Darwin - first off
>> - didn't say man "came from monkeys"
>
> Yes he did, and it was a goddang LIE!!
No he didn't. And what you said is either a lie or a bit of ignorance.
Either way, you are wrong.
>
>> but only that apes and men shared a common ancestor.
>
> semantics.
Nope, not so. If one sees the evolutionary history as a series of
branching lines, it is obvious that two species can share a common point
of origin without being directly linked. It's not merely semantic, it is
a matter of logical thought upon the very structure of the evolutionary
system.
>
>> Furthermore, that common ancestor also descended from
>> something,
>
> Correctimundo. Fish.
Since I say this, your saying it is not so very clever.
>
>> which - as any high school student not drunk, high or inept
>
> The gratuitous attacks are quite unbecoming of you.
Like I care what you think...
>
>> would know - would be one-celled and aquatic creatures.
>
> Source?
The entire knowledge base of the human species.
>
>> In between - as
>> any high school student worth their soup could tell you - fish.
>
> You sayin high school students aint worth nuthin more than a big ole
> plate a fish soup?? Thats your oppinion.
Oh - a lame joke in place of actual thought.
>
>> So - the
>> thing is we are descended from BOTH a common ancestor with apes AND
>> (further back) fish.
>
> Fish yes, apes no.
Well - since Darwin didn't say we "evolved from apes" but from a common
ancestor with apes, your restating the obvious hardly qualifies as
genius, does it?
>
>> So John's statement might be amusing in a "I didn't
>> really do much in high school except draw and write nonsense" sort of
>> way,
>
> Its also amusing in a "genius" sort of way.
No - it's just silly nonsense. Although I don't doubt John's genius in
many things, science wasn't one of them.
>
>> but as a "exposure" of Darwin - beyond pathetic.
>
> Thats your oppinion. Not fact.
No - it's a fact.
dmh
No Dale it aint no firkin fact. Its a LIE is what it frikkin is, and
if I was you Id watch yer back...fer KARMA.
Now lemme tellya sumfin. Them scientists is always sayin, "test
it"...."Use yer eyes"...."See it with yer own eyes"....
So ya know what I friggin did once?? I took them scientists
advice's. From their own words. An I woke up, smoked some fine
reefage, headed over to Mickey D's, and then went to the goddang
zoo.
Thats right, you heard me, I headed over to the goddang zoo. To see
with my own eyes. So, I guzzled a few 40's along the way, and
finished most of my burga. But I saved some fries. Ya know why??
Cuz I had plannered a TEST. I was gonna test Darwan's firkin theory.
So there I was, the frikkin zoo. They wanted a fee, but I thought it
was free. I had no cash on hand, so I wandad around a bit, then
climed up the goddang fence and over the edge. They din't see me. So
I dustered myself of, gatha'd up my fries, and stumbled on down to the
ole monkey cages.
Awrite, so's, I got their, and saw the monker. He din't act like no
relative of mine. Acted like he never knew me or was erlated to me.
And its a good thing, cuz if he did, I woulda hit him up for a
freakin loan an asked him to front me a few lid's fer Godsakes!!
Anyways, he wouldn't come near me, even AFTA I offa'd him some of
Mickey D's finest french fries!! Tha's rite, I struck m y hand thru
the goddang cage, offrin him the fries. I even dropped em on the
ground. But he woudn't come near. In fact, he lookered at me like I
was queer, and moved away to the otha side of the frikkin cage!!
So that settled it, fer one and all. PEOPLE WE AINT ERLATED TO NO
GODDAM MONKERS!!! Ferget what ya read in the books, its ALL LIES!!
BOOKS ARE NUTHIN BUT LIES!! DARWAN LIED AND TODAY HE BURNS IN HELL!!!
NUFF SAID!!
Now a bit lata, I was smokin the green with my buddy, and I tollim the
goddang story. He said, "Well Chuck you shudda offa'd that goddang
monkey some bananana's. Thats what their into ya know." And I said,
But that only proves my theory. What person wants the eat a goddang
bananana?? (Tho I admit, I smoked a few in my day :-)) We like
burga's. Burga's an fries. Pizzas, preferbly pepproni's. Hot dog's,
from Der Weinerschnitzel. Polish Sangwidges. Chicken nuggets,
perfably with honey mustid sauce. Bufflo wing's. spugetti an
meatballs. girl cheese sangwidges. Pot roast. Brownies. Meat loaf
(hole the ungyin's). TV Dinna's. Dairy Queen Ice Creams. (Where I
been known to hang out in the MENS ROOM when my cone starts
drippin. :-) Ect.
Nuff said
We're not monkers. Don't read books. No matta how many books you
read, ya still know nuffin, cuz their all LIES. Dont read books, just
read what yer ole Uncle Chollie posts ta RM friggin B.
Nuff said.
> The gratuitous attacks are quite unbecoming of you.
Are you sure you wrote the above sentence M C? I actually understood
what you were saying. Your reefer must have worn off.
> On May 5, 7:00 pm, Dale Houstman <d...@skypoint.com> wrote:
> > dmh
>
> Source?
Why, Mrs. Houstman of course. (His mother, not his wife). :-)
-H
Yeh I guess it musta been...but dont worry, Ole MC took a care a
that...I'm on my day's third 40 an gotta nice spliff goin as I
type...I'm feelin awrite in other words!!!
Nuff said
> > On May 5, 7:00 pm, Dale Houstman <d...@skypoint.com> wrote:
> > > dmh
>
> > Source?
>
> Why, Mrs. Houstman of course. (His mother, not his wife). :-)
My friend, I sugest you give ole Dale a firkin break...sure he usta be
a troll anna prick...usta be a book readerin Yoke bashin Atheist fer
Godsakes!!! But thru my logic's and science I proved to him we
(humans) din't come from no monker's...we came...as John said, our
bloved genius John, inspired by the Yoke to embrace the Yoke and
Clamma fer peace....as he said, we come's from friggin Fish!!! Just
like firkin Sushi's!!!
Mebbe that splains why I dont eat no goddang sushi's,..cuz to do so
would be a god fersakin cambal!!
Nuff said
A *Monk(e)* fish...?!?