Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Coming Soon: New Sgt.Pepper,Imagine and More

0 views
Skip to first unread message

removeFORreply Goff

unread,
Oct 17, 1997, 3:00:00 AM10/17/97
to

On 17 Oct 1997 18:16:32 GMT, ria...@aol.com (Rialto) wrote:

>This interesting info was forwarded to me from someone on the EC list:
>
>-------------[forwarded]-----------------------
>According to "Badlands Mail Order" monthly list of new releases EMI are
>releasing a "30th anniversary-edition" of "Sgt.Pepper" in a "special box
>set" and a "Centenary" remaster of "Imagine" with bonus tracks. Theres also
>a new Lennon compilation titled "Legend",released to tie in with a BBC
>special.
>
>Oh, and the 4CD box-set "Pet Sounds" is now set for release on November 3d.
Mojo mag says that Pepper has been cancelled. Apparently it was a box
set with new photos and a badge. Big deal!

Mr. John James Whelan

unread,
Oct 17, 1997, 3:00:00 AM10/17/97
to

Rialto (ria...@aol.com) writes:
> This interesting info was forwarded to me from someone on the EC list:
>
> -------------[forwarded]-----------------------
> According to "Badlands Mail Order" monthly list of new releases EMI are
> releasing a "30th anniversary-edition" of "Sgt.Pepper" in a "special box
> set" and a "Centenary" remaster of "Imagine" with bonus tracks. Theres also
> a new Lennon compilation titled "Legend",released to tie in with a BBC
> special.
>
>::::::> Oh, and the 4CD box-set "Pet Sounds" is now set for release on
November 3d.


Ah! I just can't wait for the stereo release of Pet Sounds! :)

John

--
******************************************************************************
NOTA BENE: The abovementioned posting will contain typo's & improper grammar
submissions in text. This is due to time constraints with host server
resulting in the lack of time to proof-read DOS text properly. J.W.

Rialto

unread,
Oct 17, 1997, 3:00:00 AM10/17/97
to

Bill Kopp (remove the 9's)

unread,
Oct 18, 1997, 3:00:00 AM10/18/97
to

an...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mr. John James Whelan) finished singing "My
Way," removed safety pin from cheek and spewed this on the crowd:

> NOTA BENE: The abovementioned posting will contain typo's & improper grammar
> submissions in text. This is due to time constraints with host server
> resulting in the lack of time to proof-read DOS text properly. J.W.

Just FYI it's "typos," not "typo's." You could at least fix THAT one.
No disrespect intended. :-)


----------------------------------------
"We do not believe all the requests are sent in by different people.
We believe you write them. We believe you wrote this.
Sheila and Susan from Edinburgh."

--listener letter, read on-air, "Pop Go the Beatles" #9,
Broadcast August 13 1963
----------------------------------------

Want to reply? Please replace the
bracketed spamblock stuff below. Thanks.
fabfour at mindspring dot com
---------------------------------------------

Robert O'Brien

unread,
Oct 18, 1997, 3:00:00 AM10/18/97
to

Bill Kopp (remove the 9's) <9fab...@mind9spring.com> wrote in message
<344b1af9...@news.mindspring.com>...


>an...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Mr. John James Whelan) finished singing "My
>Way," removed safety pin from cheek and spewed this on the crowd:
>
>> NOTA BENE: The abovementioned posting will contain typo's & improper
grammar
>> submissions in text. This is due to time constraints with host server
>> resulting in the lack of time to proof-read DOS text properly. J.W.
>
>Just FYI it's "typos," not "typo's." You could at least fix THAT one.
>No disrespect intended. :-)

That, and the fact that there is no such word as *abovementioned*. :)>
Seems like you'd have all the time in the world to proofread your
signature file, J.J..
Rob

Bob Stahley

unread,
Oct 18, 1997, 3:00:00 AM10/18/97
to

: That, and the fact that there is no such word as *abovementioned*. :)>

"Abovementioned" is a "portmanteau" word (a word combining the sounds and
meanings of two different words, as defined by the _Oxford Dictionary of
Current English_, and is thus valid, if not pompous as hell (he said,
knowing full well he's rather notorious for using such pretentious
language himself :) ).

ObB: Speaking of pretentious:

"The Beatles' transformation of consciousness into content has a clear
parallel in the history of fine art, particularly in the history of
modernistic painting. In painting, a comparable breakthrough was achieved
by Edoward Manet. Manet made the distancing experience of consciousness
the content of his work; he blatantly used the art of the past as his
subject matter rather than allowing it mearly to influence him; he
acknowledged the quality of earlier art, and he recognized that his
personal contribution as a painter could bonly be substantiated if it was
goold; finally he was accused of "putting down" the hisrory of his medium
and of "putting on" the audience of French art. Modernist painting has
directly and indirected explored the implications of Manet's art for more
than a century. This fact should lend caution to bredictions that rock
music will suddenly follow the Beatles' direction." -- Carl Belz, "Rock
and Fine Art," _The Story of Rock_, Oxford University Press, 1969.

--
__ __
_) _) bo...@primenet.com
__)__) tosa, witzend Why is a raven like a writing-desk?

TFred5star

unread,
Oct 24, 1997, 3:00:00 AM10/24/97
to

It's only a rumor about it being remastered!!

Bar&Wim

unread,
Oct 25, 1997, 3:00:00 AM10/25/97
to

No, it's not....or do you mean the "ADD"-addition on some Beatle-CD's?
Why dont' they give Revolver and Sgt. Peppers the
"pet-Sounds"-treatment? Now released in full and crisp stereo! (In a
boxed set, but that's much better than just add a button and a few
pieces of cardboard anyway)
Wim


TFred5star

unread,
Oct 25, 1997, 3:00:00 AM10/25/97
to

I don't think they should remix it. I think they should one day make up their
minds about what the F... is the best remastering process and just F...... do
it already. And after it's done, let it be done so we don't have to keep
rebuying all this crap over and over again until the sun and all new and
abused technologies cease to exist!!! On a kinder note, I hope they release
the later applicable albums in mono as collecter's edition (like with the
recent Pink Floyd releases). I think they can get away with it because they
did with the mono singles and ep box sets. Let them press one, I'll buy it.
Also, release the lp's on better quality vinyl than these recent editions... I
think they were pressed on 39.9 gram vinyl. Please, at least 180 grams. It's
not too much to ask for. Note. Technically, I'm not asking for anything
because I'm posting on a newsgroup and I'm not in conversation with the powers
to be, etc.

Danny Caccavo

unread,
Oct 25, 1997, 3:00:00 AM10/25/97
to

In article <877730943.2779....@news.demon.nl>, "Bar&Wim"
<Bar&W...@bawimeko.demon.nl> wrote:

The "Pet Sounds" treatment is very involved. Kind of like what they did
with "Penny Lane" on Anthology - they "hand synced" the original 4 track
tapes (including mixdown reels) to create a new multitrack master. With
Pet Sounds, the mulitrack layout was -mono music on one track, remaining 7
tracks for vocals. So they hand synced the original 3(or 4) track masters
with the 8 track vocal master. With Pepper, this would be a mammoth job -
involving hand syncing 3, 4, or sometimes 5 reels per song.

And would you sync the scream for "Sgt Pepper" in the "mono" placement or
the 'stereo'? <g>.

The complaints about a remix would outstrip any complaints about
remastering by about 100 to 1....but if they did do it, Furmanek is the
only one I'd trust...

DC

--
Danny Caccavo (dan...@interport.net)
This Way Studios
http://www.users.interport.net/~danielj/

"Hey, Bee-atle - we shall have fun, eh?"
(delete the * from my return address for replies.....)

0 new messages