RE: Jose Joaquin Sanjenis Perdomo
dlarsson
- Does anyone know, WHEN Jose Perdomo was first hired
(or appeared ) to take the position of the Dakota building
security gate guard?
- Were there additional guards that also worked at the
building with him just being - one member?
- Was he a full time employee? Was he a fill-in?
A last-minute scratch replacement?
- Who was in the position of hiring him? Who put him there?
- When did he leave (discontinue working there)?
- What credentials and prior experience did he have
to be the building night security-gate guard for the
entire Dakota building?
These are questions that need to be understood
before ,or, in order to conclude that he had an
active role in the murder of Lennon.
It is clear, however, that he had, at least, a passive
role in the murder of Lennon ( could have been
either unintended or intended ) and an active role
in how the story "went down" for the police & news
coverage.
Perdomo's behavior was -the- enabling event
that allowed for a successful shooting attack on
John Lennon to take place. The fact that his behavior
also violated the usual typical and normal security
procedures and protocol is alarming.
This is the place to focus on regarding the Lennon murder.
Salvador Astucia
Thanks Derek, for writing such an intelligent response to my
article.
http://www.jfkmontreal.com/john_lennon/Usenet/Perdomo.htm
And also, it's good to see you back again. I've noticed
your messages after being away for awhile. Welcome back
and Happy New Year.
I'll have to look through some of my old notes to find
answers to some of your questions. For example, I know
the name of the company who manages the Dakota now,
or actually, I got the information a year ago, so
there's a possibility the management might have
changed hands. One of the doormen gave me that information
when I was up there taking pictures.
The information about who hired Perdomo is of interest
to me; however, even if we find that person's name,
it doesn't mean that individual was involved in the
conspiracy. Someone within the law enforcement community
could have easily recommended Perdomo to the management
company as a doorman/security guard. Local police forces,
particularly the NYPD, are tight with the FBI. So it would
have been no problem for the NYPD/FBI to have pulled a few
strings to get Perdomo hired at the Dakota. We don't want
to turn this into a witch hunt and accuse well-meaning
employees of the Dakota's management firm of participating
in the conspiracy to murder John Lennon.
But thanks again for the comments.
Salvador Astucia
==
Ordering information for Salvador Astucia's books can be found at
http://www.jfkmontreal.com/raveningwolf/
Also see Astucia's homepage: http://www.jfkmontreal.com
dlarsson
> We don't want
> to turn this into a witch hunt and accuse well-meaning
> employees of the Dakota's management firm of participating
> in the conspiracy to murder John Lennon.
>
> But thanks again for the comments.
>
> Salvador Astucia
I'm very interested in the timelines here.
When did Perdomo begin to appear on the scene?
Who did he replace?
Did Perdomo share his role with other exisiting Dakota security guards
or was he, in effect, the sole security official?
When did he stop working there?
And, yes, who hired him and what were his credentials
and his prior experience in order to "get" the job?
Did he ever submit a resume?
I am not suggesting that the Dakota management company
is at fault, just that this history is important to understanding
the appearance/employment of Jose Perdomo in such a
key position as to effect Lennon's very life and whether
Perdomo was even justified on merit to be in that position.
- Derek
Salvador Astucia
These are all good questions, but it's difficult to
believe basic information about Perdomo's background
and his employment at the Dakota wasn't (isn't) known
by high-ranking officials within the NYPD and NYC legal
community from Day One, not to mention the mayor. Only
sheer incompetence would have prevented Manhattan District
Attorney Robert M. Morgenthau or former Mayor Ed Koch
from knowing this kind of information. It's obvious
there was a cover-up at the highest level. Why be
concerned with Perdomo's resume and credentials
when his name itself was withheld from the public for over
six years? Peter Brown referred to Perdomo as Jay Hastings
in his book, The Love You Make. It's outrageous that a
major publishing company would release a book with such
an obvious flaw in the description of Lennon's murder,
which had only occurred only three years prior to
publication of Brown's whitewash book. Come on. A cover-up
is a cover-up is a cover-up.
http://www.jfkmontreal.com/john_lennon/Usenet/Perdomo.htm
SaIvador Astucia
<cropdu...@cs.com> wrote:
>These are all good questions, but it's difficult to
>believe basic information about Perdomo's background
(snip)
It's not too difficult to understand Salvadore's basic
background...because it's basic....basic crap that is..
and when he plagarises other peoples works, he plagarises
the really shonky ones and then tries to put them together to get a
new shonky theory going..
here is but a small taste of Salvaodre's shitty work.
Salvadore's fallacy no 1)
1) John Lennon was not the leader of USA public opinion against the
Vietnam war.
>just as he successfully led the effort
>as a major rock star
>to turn public opinion against US involvement in Vietnam War in the late Sixties and early Seventies.
Fallacy no2)
Salvadore's claim that
Records reveal a "Jose Joaquin Sanjenis Perdomo
is wrong.
Perdomo Estevez, Jose A.---- R-537. R-710.
is on the Bay of Pigs cuban website link.
The door man Salvadore refers to is known as
Jose Joaquin Sanjenis Perdomo,
or if he was listed on the Cuban website ,that would be
Perdomo, Jose Joaquin Sanjenis
Since when does
Perdomo, Jose Joaquin Sanjenis = Perdomo , Estevez Jose A.
It doesn't and how many Perdomo's are there in the USA phone book
anyway?
How many Peter Brown's are there in a Uk phone book?
Fallacy no 3)
>It wasn't until March 2, 1987 that Gaines finally revealed
>the doorman's name as Jose Perdomo in an article for People
>entitled, "In the Shadows a Killer Waited."
Because someone writes a name in the newspaper it doesn't mean it is
correct, anymore than Peter Brown writing a name in his book does.
All following articles after march2 1987 that mention Perdomo can be
seen to be articles that have been plagarised/lifted from Gaines
article....including yours Salvadore....that is not making it truth,
it is just repeating unproven, unsubstantiated journalism....
Just as your false claim of E.M.I. being Electrical and Mechanical
industries , can be seen to be a plagarism from a book that you read ,
that was incorrect, so we can see your claim of Perdomo for being
plagarism from another unsubstantiated source..this time it's people
magazine..
Salvadore, you just plagarise unsubstantiated opinons, to suit some
wild claim....and even when shown to be wrong...you never apologise
for being wrong.
snip rest of assnine drivel, because all theories from Salvadore come
from false beliefs that others before him have written....or from
hearsay..
kent
> background...because it's basic....basic crap that is..
> and when he plagarises other peoples works, he plagarises
> the really shonky ones and then tries to put them together to get a
> new shonky theory going..
>
> here is but a small taste of Salvaodre's shitty work.
>
> Salvadore's fallacy no 1)
>
> 1) John Lennon was not the leader of USA public opinion against the
> Vietnam war.
>
> >just as he successfully led the effort
> >as a major rock star
> >to turn public opinion against US involvement in Vietnam War in the late Sixties and early Seventies.
>
Whether or not he "led the effort" is irrelevant as he was obviously concerned with the Vietnam conflict
and actively involved as a high profile celebrity in drawing attention to what he believed was an immoral
American involvement.
http://www.iamthebeatles.com/article1037.html
by John T. Marck
(begin quote)
In addition to his music, Lennon frequently involved himself politically, and at this time in 1971, he was
at the top of his political involvement. Lennon detested the war in Vietnam, and other iniquities, and
demonstrated this through his bed-ins and other peaceful demonstrations. A short time after moving to New
York, Lennon met with people considered subversive, like Jerry Rubin and other members of his group known
as the New Left.
To assist with the many injustices occurring around the world, Lennon said that he was considering
involving himself using his popularity for fund raisers, voter-registration drives, and anti-war rallies
and concerts. These activities were planned to take place in many of the presidential primary states in
1972, and this deeply troubled Richard Nixon and the Republican Party. Consequently, many Republicans
feared that Lennon, through these motivated activities, would jump-start the anti-war movement, resulting
in the majority of young Americans voting against Nixon in the upcoming election.
Through the Freedom of Information Act, it was revealed that on February 4, 1972, Senator Strom Thurmond
wrote a memo, classified as secret, citing Lennon as a danger to the Presidents' 1972 reelection campaign.
So what could the Republicans do to prevent this? Easy they thought - just revoke Lennon's visa. Thurmond
said further that "if Lennon's visa is terminated, it would be a strategy counter-measure." He further
advised that "caution must be taken with regard to the possible alienation of the so-called
18-year-old-vote if Lennon is expelled from the country."
(end quote)
Obviously Lennon was not only drawing attention to the Vietnam problem but associating with other high
profile antiVietnam activists (Jerry Rubin for instance http://id.essortment.com/jerryrubinwho_rkoj.htm)
and putting himself in an adversarial position with very powerful political entities who considered him
enough of a threat to target.
Any connection with Jose Joaquin Sanjenis Perdomo is interesting considering the political circumstances
and social associations Lennon obviously had made but I would like to see some definitive information
regarding Perdomo's actual social/political/work history.
Kent
