Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
LOVE
39 views
Skip to first unread message
Nil
May 19, 2013, 12:16:04 PM5/19/13
to
I finally got to see the Cirque du Soleil show "LOVE" in Las Vegas a
few days ago. I enjoyed it a lot - there were many striking visual and
musical moments, and the set, lighting, and sound design effects were
fantastic. I've seen a couple of other Cirque du Soleil shows that were
better as acrobatic shows. LOVE had more "acting", miming, character
stuff, and less of the athletics. It could have used a bit more
trampoline action and less posing.
It wasn't the revelation I thought it would be, but I'm glad I saw it.
I do wonder how the younger audience members relate to it. All the
little audio and visual references mean something to me, but what about
them? The guy next to me spent most of the show texting. I don't think
he was that into the show.
few days ago. I enjoyed it a lot - there were many striking visual and
musical moments, and the set, lighting, and sound design effects were
fantastic. I've seen a couple of other Cirque du Soleil shows that were
better as acrobatic shows. LOVE had more "acting", miming, character
stuff, and less of the athletics. It could have used a bit more
trampoline action and less posing.
It wasn't the revelation I thought it would be, but I'm glad I saw it.
I do wonder how the younger audience members relate to it. All the
little audio and visual references mean something to me, but what about
them? The guy next to me spent most of the show texting. I don't think
he was that into the show.
Mack A. Damia
May 19, 2013, 12:23:41 PM5/19/13
to
On 19 May 2013 16:16:04 GMT, Nil <redn...@REMOVETHIScomcast.net>
wrote:
Read this past week's cover story in Time Magazine, "The Me Me Me
Generation" (millennials). It's frightening!
--
wrote:
Generation" (millennials). It's frightening!
--
Bernie Woodham
May 19, 2013, 3:43:59 PM5/19/13
to
On May 19, 12:23 pm, Mack A. Damia <mybaconbu...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Read this past week's cover story in Time Magazine, "The Me Me Me
> Generation" (millennials). It's frightening!
>
> --
Haven't read the Time article. But it seems like typical generational
>
>
> Read this past week's cover story in Time Magazine, "The Me Me Me
> Generation" (millennials). It's frightening!
>
> --
discourse.
http://www.policymic.com/articles/41419/me-me-me-generation-top-5-time-magazine-cover-parodies
Message has been deleted
Nil
May 19, 2013, 9:45:44 PM5/19/13
to
On 19 May 2013, super70s <supe...@super70s.invalid> wrote in
rec.music.beatles:
> It's been around for a while hasn't it. By coincidence I watched
> my taped copy of the Larry King Live "LOVE" special with Paul,
> Ringo, Yoko and Olivia last night. That was from June 2007.
I had been wondering about that, too. The people I was with seemed to
think LOVE was only a couple of years old, but I knew it was a lot
older. I looked it up, and it opened in Vegas in 2006. 7 years old!
rec.music.beatles:
> It's been around for a while hasn't it. By coincidence I watched
> my taped copy of the Larry King Live "LOVE" special with Paul,
> Ringo, Yoko and Olivia last night. That was from June 2007.
I had been wondering about that, too. The people I was with seemed to
think LOVE was only a couple of years old, but I knew it was a lot
older. I looked it up, and it opened in Vegas in 2006. 7 years old!
Bernie Woodham
May 19, 2013, 10:22:52 PM5/19/13
to
On May 19, 9:45 pm, Nil <redno...@REMOVETHIScomcast.net> wrote:
> On 19 May 2013, super70s <super...@super70s.invalid> wrote in
I was out in Vegas in May of 2006 and remember there was a lot of
publicity for it.
> On 19 May 2013, super70s <super...@super70s.invalid> wrote in
publicity for it.
Eric Ramon
May 19, 2013, 10:44:15 PM5/19/13
to
On May 19, 6:45 pm, Nil <redno...@REMOVETHIScomcast.net> wrote:
> On 19 May 2013, super70s <super...@super70s.invalid> wrote in
remember the Threetles? And how exciting it was going to be? That was
18 years ago.
> On 19 May 2013, super70s <super...@super70s.invalid> wrote in
18 years ago.
Bernie Woodham
May 19, 2013, 11:08:50 PM5/19/13
to
On May 19, 12:16 pm, Nil <redno...@REMOVETHIScomcast.net> wrote:
> I finally got to see the Cirque du Soleil show "LOVE" in Las Vegas a
> few days ago.
>
> I finally got to see the Cirque du Soleil show "LOVE" in Las Vegas a
> few days ago.
>
> I do wonder how the younger audience members relate to it. All the
> little audio and visual references mean something to me, but what about
> them?
They probably miss out on the nuances, but I believe younger audiences
> little audio and visual references mean something to me, but what about
> them?
respond positively to The Beatles in general.
You wouldn't know it from listening to the snobs. But the Across the
Universe film went over pretty well with younger audiences.
My sister took her high-school age daughter to Ringo's show a couple
of years ago. They both thought the music was superb. You're talking
about veteran musicians.
They also have that guitar game with the Beatles, so her kids are
really familiar with the music anyway.
Tim
May 19, 2013, 11:12:54 PM5/19/13
to
On May 19, 6:45 pm, Nil <redno...@REMOVETHIScomcast.net> wrote:
> On 19 May 2013, super70s <super...@super70s.invalid> wrote in
months of it's Premier Performance, Not a bad seat in the house
either. And there's so many high rollers at The Mirage, that sellouts
are guaranteed for most every show, with tickets averaging 100 bucks
or so. It's indeed a splendid and lengthy mashup of Beatles classics
which, by now, I feel could use an alteration of songs/dance
sequences, just to bring back those millions of us who've already paid
witness to the original show. Also, it's time by now, to DVD the
original show rather than using one's imagination to the the CD, just
to give the masses who can't get there, a more realistic view of
"LOVE"
jtees4
May 20, 2013, 9:05:50 AM5/20/13
to
On 19 May 2013 16:16:04 GMT, Nil <redn...@REMOVETHIScomcast.net>
wrote:
wrote:
*************
Some of my music:
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/default.cfm?bandID=789610
hislop
May 20, 2013, 9:24:40 AM5/20/13
to
Didn't like the CD, but read somewhere that you have to hear the 5.1
because songs appear in different speakers and music is travelling
around them.
DVD-Audio should also include conventional DVD-Video with 5.1 in DTS
and/or Dolby.
Skokiaan
May 20, 2013, 9:53:49 AM5/20/13
to
On May 19, 12:16 pm, Nil <redno...@REMOVETHIScomcast.net> wrote:
"Love" does have much less acrobatics than the typical Cirque du
Soliel show, probably because it uses prerecorded music. The more
acrobatic shows have live bands, allowing scenes to be stretched as
needed to fit with the flexible timing of the more difficult acts.
Nil
May 20, 2013, 5:55:12 PM5/20/13
to
On 20 May 2013, Skokiaan <skoki...@gmail.com> wrote in
rec.music.beatles:
> The texting guy probably had comp tickets, very common in Vegas.
>
> "Love" does have much less acrobatics than the typical Cirque du
> Soliel show, probably because it uses prerecorded music. The more
> acrobatic shows have live bands, allowing scenes to be stretched
> as needed to fit with the flexible timing of the more difficult
> acts.
LOVE had a lot of posing, and the acrobatics were rather repetitive -
like the Lucy in the Sky character flying around the theater, creating
a beautiful image. Then she flew around again in the same way - then
again, for the whole song. The routines in the other Cirque shows
seemed to develop more. Maybe the recorded music had something to do
with it, as you suggest. There would be more give and take with a live
orchestra - they could hit the cues together, guided by the conductor.
rec.music.beatles:
> The texting guy probably had comp tickets, very common in Vegas.
>
> "Love" does have much less acrobatics than the typical Cirque du
> Soliel show, probably because it uses prerecorded music. The more
> acrobatic shows have live bands, allowing scenes to be stretched
> as needed to fit with the flexible timing of the more difficult
> acts.
like the Lucy in the Sky character flying around the theater, creating
a beautiful image. Then she flew around again in the same way - then
again, for the whole song. The routines in the other Cirque shows
seemed to develop more. Maybe the recorded music had something to do
with it, as you suggest. There would be more give and take with a live
orchestra - they could hit the cues together, guided by the conductor.
Skokiaan
May 21, 2013, 9:43:22 AM5/21/13
to
On May 20, 5:55 pm, Nil <redno...@REMOVETHIScomcast.net> wrote:
> On 20 May 2013, Skokiaan <skokiaa...@gmail.com> wrote in
In the live band shows the band follows the action. A tightrope or
trapeze act can't time themselves to prerecorded music, and when they
fall the music adjusts accordingly.
> On 20 May 2013, Skokiaan <skokiaa...@gmail.com> wrote in
trapeze act can't time themselves to prerecorded music, and when they
fall the music adjusts accordingly.
birdseyei...@gmail.com
May 21, 2013, 3:02:14 PM5/21/13
to
Personally, I've not jumped at the chance to see this. The thought of a bunch of double-jointed contortionists gyrating to Beatles' tunes that are presented in a way the Beatles did not initially intend them to be is not appealing to me. I saw a Cirque du Soleil show in Vegas once and the creep factor was set on high.
However....from what some of you are saying, maybe the circus act has been toned down somewhat and maybe hearing the Beatles' music over a fantastic sound system could be great, and maybe my own personal aversion to these mashes (I always considered as Beatles blasphemy) could be overcome as they might actually give a new perspective to the music. After all, wasn't it George Harrison's idea in the first place?
However....from what some of you are saying, maybe the circus act has been toned down somewhat and maybe hearing the Beatles' music over a fantastic sound system could be great, and maybe my own personal aversion to these mashes (I always considered as Beatles blasphemy) could be overcome as they might actually give a new perspective to the music. After all, wasn't it George Harrison's idea in the first place?
hislop
May 22, 2013, 1:58:50 AM5/22/13
to
On 20/05/2013 2:16 AM, Nil wrote:
Should be getting the DVD-Audio of Love soon.
Didn't like the CD, but read somewhere that you have to hear the 5.1
because songs appear in different speakers and music is travelling
around them.
DVD-Audio should also include conventional DVD-Video with 5.1 in DTS
and/or Dolby.
Oddly amazon Canada has a fair number of it but nobody else.
Didn't like the CD, but read somewhere that you have to hear the 5.1
because songs appear in different speakers and music is travelling
around them.
DVD-Audio should also include conventional DVD-Video with 5.1 in DTS
and/or Dolby.
Tim
May 23, 2013, 3:07:56 AM5/23/13
to
On May 21, 12:02 pm, birdseyeinspecti...@gmail.com wrote:
> Personally, I've not jumped at the chance to see this. The thought of a bunch of double-jointed contortionists gyrating to Beatles' tunes that are presented in a way the Beatles did not initially intend them to be is not appealing to me. I saw a Cirque du Soleil show in Vegas once and the creep factor was set on high.
>
> However....from what some of you are saying, maybe the circus act has been toned down somewhat and maybe hearing the Beatles' music over a fantastic sound system could be great, and maybe my own personal aversion to these mashes (I always considered as Beatles blasphemy) could be overcome as they might actually give a new perspective to the music. After all, wasn't it George Harrison's idea in the first place?
Yes.
> Personally, I've not jumped at the chance to see this. The thought of a bunch of double-jointed contortionists gyrating to Beatles' tunes that are presented in a way the Beatles did not initially intend them to be is not appealing to me. I saw a Cirque du Soleil show in Vegas once and the creep factor was set on high.
>
> However....from what some of you are saying, maybe the circus act has been toned down somewhat and maybe hearing the Beatles' music over a fantastic sound system could be great, and maybe my own personal aversion to these mashes (I always considered as Beatles blasphemy) could be overcome as they might actually give a new perspective to the music. After all, wasn't it George Harrison's idea in the first place?
thewalruswasdanny
May 24, 2013, 9:11:05 PM5/24/13
to
> remember the Threetles? And how exciting it was going to be? That was
>
> 18 years ago.
Danny
dan...@realtime.net
May 25, 2013, 1:00:17 AM5/25/13
to
By the by -- I discovered that "Lunch" by The Rutles is up on on Youtube. Just so you know, it's an unauthorized knock-off of the "Love" CD, and it's as well done, if not superior, to what George Martin did with "Love", which shouldn't be surprising since over the course of making "All You Need Is Cash" and "Archaeology", Neil Innes actually wrote & recorded homages/parodies of several Beatles songs not once but twice, which in turn provides much more fertile sound-ground for creating mash-ups. The "Lunch" menu is as seen below:
00:00 01. Between Us
01:02 02. Get Up and Go
03:07 03. Unfinished Words
04:08 04. Lonely-Phobia/ Now She's Left You (transition)
07:13 05. Piggy in the Middle
11:20 06. Hold My Hand
12:18 07. Goose-Step Mama/It's Looking Good/Blue Suede Schubert
13:59 08. Ouch!
15:49 09. Another Day
17:58 10. Nevertheless/Joe Public
19:33 11. Good Times Roll
23:50 12. I Love You (transition)
24:10 13. Eine Kleine Middle Klasse/Let's Be Natural/Questionnaire (transition)
29:04 14. Hey Mister!
32:15 15. We've Arrived! (And to Prove It We're Here)
34:26 16. Cheese and Onions
37:19 17. Shangri-La
41:33 18. Major Happy's Up And Coming Once Upon A Good Time Band (reprise)
42:27 19. Love Life
Hear 'er here, hear? : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sL4VSzC4168
(alt. source) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTKjEo4jo4w
-- dr pepper
PS: Here are some other Rutlegs:
The Rutles "This is the... The Savage Young Rutles"
(Rehearsal Sessions - 1978) [Full Album]
01. 00:00 "Baby Let Me Be"
02. 02:07 "Blue Suede Schubert"
03. 04:28 "Between Us"
04. 06:58 "It's Looking Good"
05. 08:57 "Goose Step Mama"
06. 11:31 "I Must Be In Love"
07. 13:50 "We've Arrived"
08. 15:56 "Now She's Left You"
09. 17:43 "Number One"
10. 20:25 "Love Life"
11. 22:43 "Good Times Roll"
12. 25:53 "Doubleback Alley"
13. 29:06 "Piggy In the Middle"
14. 31:55 "Let's Be Natural"
15. 34:21 "Get Up and Go"
16. 37:50 "Living In Hope"
17. 40:27 "Plenty of Time"
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAl05ADbEWM]
The Rutles "Yesterday's Leftovers" (Bootleg) [Full Album]
01. 00:00 "I Must Be In Love [1]"
02. 02:39 "The Children of Rock and Roll"
03. 03:26 "I Must Be In Love [2]"
04. 05:46 "Cheese and Onions"
05. 07:12 "Shangri-La"
06. 10:35 "Hold My Hand"
07. 13:06 "Brian Thigh Interview"
08. 14:31 "You Need Feet" (Bernard Bresslaw)
09. 15:40 "Dirk's Love Song" (De, De, De, De, De , De)
10. 16:29 "Lullaby"
11. 16:58 "Baby S'il Vous Plait" ("Baby Let Me Be" - French Version)
12. 18:52 "My Little Ukelele"
13. 20:53 "Under My Skin"
14. 24:23 "Rut-a-Lot"
15. 30:18 "I Must Be In Love [3]"
16. 32:36 "Not Letting It Be"
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drpmQnFmiNU]
00:00 01. Between Us
01:02 02. Get Up and Go
03:07 03. Unfinished Words
04:08 04. Lonely-Phobia/ Now She's Left You (transition)
07:13 05. Piggy in the Middle
11:20 06. Hold My Hand
12:18 07. Goose-Step Mama/It's Looking Good/Blue Suede Schubert
13:59 08. Ouch!
15:49 09. Another Day
17:58 10. Nevertheless/Joe Public
19:33 11. Good Times Roll
23:50 12. I Love You (transition)
24:10 13. Eine Kleine Middle Klasse/Let's Be Natural/Questionnaire (transition)
29:04 14. Hey Mister!
32:15 15. We've Arrived! (And to Prove It We're Here)
34:26 16. Cheese and Onions
37:19 17. Shangri-La
41:33 18. Major Happy's Up And Coming Once Upon A Good Time Band (reprise)
42:27 19. Love Life
Hear 'er here, hear? : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sL4VSzC4168
(alt. source) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTKjEo4jo4w
-- dr pepper
PS: Here are some other Rutlegs:
The Rutles "This is the... The Savage Young Rutles"
(Rehearsal Sessions - 1978) [Full Album]
01. 00:00 "Baby Let Me Be"
02. 02:07 "Blue Suede Schubert"
03. 04:28 "Between Us"
04. 06:58 "It's Looking Good"
05. 08:57 "Goose Step Mama"
06. 11:31 "I Must Be In Love"
07. 13:50 "We've Arrived"
08. 15:56 "Now She's Left You"
09. 17:43 "Number One"
10. 20:25 "Love Life"
11. 22:43 "Good Times Roll"
12. 25:53 "Doubleback Alley"
13. 29:06 "Piggy In the Middle"
14. 31:55 "Let's Be Natural"
15. 34:21 "Get Up and Go"
16. 37:50 "Living In Hope"
17. 40:27 "Plenty of Time"
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAl05ADbEWM]
The Rutles "Yesterday's Leftovers" (Bootleg) [Full Album]
01. 00:00 "I Must Be In Love [1]"
02. 02:39 "The Children of Rock and Roll"
03. 03:26 "I Must Be In Love [2]"
04. 05:46 "Cheese and Onions"
05. 07:12 "Shangri-La"
06. 10:35 "Hold My Hand"
07. 13:06 "Brian Thigh Interview"
08. 14:31 "You Need Feet" (Bernard Bresslaw)
09. 15:40 "Dirk's Love Song" (De, De, De, De, De , De)
10. 16:29 "Lullaby"
11. 16:58 "Baby S'il Vous Plait" ("Baby Let Me Be" - French Version)
12. 18:52 "My Little Ukelele"
13. 20:53 "Under My Skin"
14. 24:23 "Rut-a-Lot"
15. 30:18 "I Must Be In Love [3]"
16. 32:36 "Not Letting It Be"
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drpmQnFmiNU]
who?
May 25, 2013, 10:40:08 PM5/25/13
to
On May 24, 8:11 pm, thewalruswasdanny <thewalruswasda...@gmail.com>
wrote:
No reason to be frightened, Danny. You don't believe in God, so
when you're dead, you'll either not know you're dead or worse.
Jeff
wrote:
when you're dead, you'll either not know you're dead or worse.
Jeff
Tim
May 26, 2013, 2:07:58 AM5/26/13
to
hislop
May 27, 2013, 10:36:17 AM5/27/13
to
On 20/05/2013 2:16 AM, Nil wrote:
I Am The Walrus in 5.1 sounds great.
Much better listening than the mess on CD.
Eric Ramon
May 27, 2013, 3:06:36 PM5/27/13
to
On May 24, 10:00 pm, danc...@realtime.net wrote:
> By the by -- I discovered that "Lunch" by The Rutles is up on on Youtube. Just so you know, it's an unauthorized knock-off of the "Love" CD, and it's as well done, if not superior, to what George Martin did with "Love", which shouldn't be surprising since over the course of making "All You Need Is Cash" and "Archaeology", Neil Innes actually wrote & recorded homages/parodies of several Beatles songs not once but twice, which in turn provides much more fertile sound-ground for creating mash-ups. The "Lunch" menu is as seen below:
>
> 00:00 01. Between Us
> 01:02 02. Get Up and Go
> 03:07 03. Unfinished Words
> 04:08 04. Lonely-Phobia/ Now She's Left You (transition)
> 07:13 05. Piggy in the Middle
> 11:20 06. Hold My Hand
> 12:18 07. Goose-Step Mama/It's Looking Good/Blue Suede Schubert
> 13:59 08. Ouch!
> 15:49 09. Another Day
> 17:58 10. Nevertheless/Joe Public
> 19:33 11. Good Times Roll
> 23:50 12. I Love You (transition)
> 24:10 13. Eine Kleine Middle Klasse/Let's Be Natural/Questionnaire (transition)
> 29:04 14. Hey Mister!
> 32:15 15. We've Arrived! (And to Prove It We're Here)
> 34:26 16. Cheese and Onions
> 37:19 17. Shangri-La
> 41:33 18. Major Happy's Up And Coming Once Upon A Good Time Band (reprise)
> 42:27 19. Love Life
>
> Hear 'er here, hear? :http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sL4VSzC4168
> (alt. source)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTKjEo4jo4w
> By the by -- I discovered that "Lunch" by The Rutles is up on on Youtube. Just so you know, it's an unauthorized knock-off of the "Love" CD, and it's as well done, if not superior, to what George Martin did with "Love", which shouldn't be surprising since over the course of making "All You Need Is Cash" and "Archaeology", Neil Innes actually wrote & recorded homages/parodies of several Beatles songs not once but twice, which in turn provides much more fertile sound-ground for creating mash-ups. The "Lunch" menu is as seen below:
>
> 00:00 01. Between Us
> 01:02 02. Get Up and Go
> 03:07 03. Unfinished Words
> 04:08 04. Lonely-Phobia/ Now She's Left You (transition)
> 07:13 05. Piggy in the Middle
> 11:20 06. Hold My Hand
> 12:18 07. Goose-Step Mama/It's Looking Good/Blue Suede Schubert
> 13:59 08. Ouch!
> 15:49 09. Another Day
> 17:58 10. Nevertheless/Joe Public
> 19:33 11. Good Times Roll
> 23:50 12. I Love You (transition)
> 24:10 13. Eine Kleine Middle Klasse/Let's Be Natural/Questionnaire (transition)
> 29:04 14. Hey Mister!
> 32:15 15. We've Arrived! (And to Prove It We're Here)
> 34:26 16. Cheese and Onions
> 37:19 17. Shangri-La
> 41:33 18. Major Happy's Up And Coming Once Upon A Good Time Band (reprise)
> 42:27 19. Love Life
>
> Hear 'er here, hear? :http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sL4VSzC4168
Young Rutles (it's really pretty good!) is the out of place lead
guitar. Perhaps it's a joke that I'm missing, though. Could be!
Stephen X. Carter
Jun 6, 2013, 9:06:33 PM6/6/13
to
theatre. He gets the trapeze going, and going, and then when it's going
round and round he lets go. So, he's unattached to anything, but moving
through the air in synch with the trapeze.
Disturbing.
--
steve.hat.stephencarter.not.com.but.net
Nothing is Beatle Proof!!
Mr Kite posters and more at http://www.zazzle.com/mr_kite*
Mr Kite posters and more at http://www.zazzle.co.uk/mr_kite*
Stephen X. Carter
Jun 6, 2013, 9:07:11 PM6/6/13
to
On Tue, 28 May 2013 00:36:17 +1000, hislop <takecar...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>Playing the 5.1 DVD-Audio right now.
>I Am The Walrus in 5.1 sounds great.
>Much better listening than the mess on CD.
I've had that view since it first came out! Welcome.
wrote:
>Playing the 5.1 DVD-Audio right now.
>I Am The Walrus in 5.1 sounds great.
>Much better listening than the mess on CD.
Nil
Jun 6, 2013, 11:38:58 PM6/6/13
to
On 06 Jun 2013, Stephen X. Carter <steve@[127.0.0.1]> wrote in
rec.music.beatles:
> There's a bloke during "Mr Kite" on a trapeze high up at the top
> of the theatre. He gets the trapeze going, and going, and then
> when it's going round and round he lets go. So, he's unattached to
> anything, but moving through the air in synch with the trapeze.
>
> Disturbing.
Yes, that was one of the many very striking and memorable moments.
rec.music.beatles:
> There's a bloke during "Mr Kite" on a trapeze high up at the top
> of the theatre. He gets the trapeze going, and going, and then
> when it's going round and round he lets go. So, he's unattached to
> anything, but moving through the air in synch with the trapeze.
>
> Disturbing.
Nil
Jun 6, 2013, 11:47:21 PM6/6/13
to
On 06 Jun 2013, Stephen X. Carter <steve@[127.0.0.1]> wrote in
rec.music.beatles:
rec.music.beatles:
> On Tue, 28 May 2013 00:36:17 +1000, hislop <takecar...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Playing the 5.1 DVD-Audio right now.
>>I Am The Walrus in 5.1 sounds great.
>>Much better listening than the mess on CD.
>
> I've had that view since it first came out! Welcome.
When I saw it last month, my seat was in the last row of that section.
> wrote:
>
>>Playing the 5.1 DVD-Audio right now.
>>I Am The Walrus in 5.1 sounds great.
>>Much better listening than the mess on CD.
>
> I've had that view since it first came out! Welcome.
It was a good central position to see all the action, and there was a
row of rear surround speakers right behind my head - I had a fun
perspective of a lot of the isolated parts and effects.
Stephen X. Carter
Jun 8, 2013, 3:48:42 AM6/8/13
to
On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 23:47:21 -0400, Nil <redn...@REMOVETHIScomcast.net>
wrote:
The main reason why "Love" cannot tour is that all of the seats have
speakers built in to them. All.
wrote:
speakers built in to them. All.
0 new messages