I was watching the dimming of the headlight on my Kawie as I engaged
the starter. The headlight is hard-wired to the "ON" position and is
always illuminated when the key is turner to the run position.
That extra load will slow down the starter a bit, shorten the life of
the battery a bit, and slow down the recharging of the battery.
The charging circuit is designed the the headlight load to be there
continuously. Would anything be damaged if I added a switch in series
to leave the headlight off for continuous running? I know it's
illegal not to have a headlight as a running light, but my concern is
that the loss of the load would spike some voltages and then possibly
harm something expensive such as an electronic ignition system.
What say ye, would it hurt to disconnect the headlight for extended
running?
Thanks in advance,
Biker Dude
> circuit is designed the the headlight load to be there
> continuously. Would anything be damaged if I added a switch in series
> to leave the headlight off for continuous running?
No.
> I know it's
> illegal not to have a headlight as a running light, but my concern is
> that the loss of the load would spike some voltages and then possibly
> harm something expensive such as an electronic ignition system.
Generations of bikes, in other countries, have had headlights that
aren't permanently on, and have had no such problems.
>
> What say ye, would it hurt to disconnect the headlight for extended
> running?
No. It might even save you a few bucks a year in extended bulb life.
--
BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Honda CB400F Triumph Street Triple
Suzuki TS250ER GN250 Damn, back to six bikes!
Try Googling before asking a damn silly question.
chateau dot murray at idnet dot com
> I was watching the dimming of the headlight on my Kawie as I engaged
> the starter. The headlight is hard-wired to the "ON" position and is
> always illuminated when the key is turner to the run position.
Someone has screwed around with your Kawasaki's headlight circuit.
The headlight should be off until the engine starts running. There
is a relay box and one or more diodes that makes this happen. It's
been a feature of Kawasakis ever since the late 70s/early 80s.
> That extra load will slow down the starter a bit, shorten the life of
> the battery a bit, and slow down the recharging of the battery.
>
> The charging circuit is designed the the headlight load to be there
> continuously. Would anything be damaged if I added a switch in series
> to leave the headlight off for continuous running? I know it's
> illegal not to have a headlight as a running light, but my concern is
> that the loss of the load would spike some voltages and then possibly
> harm something expensive such as an electronic ignition system.
Adding a switch is unnecessary. As you say, the bike's charging system
is designed to have the headlight on all the time when the engine is
running and has enough capacity to charge the battery while running the
headlight.
> What say ye, would it hurt to disconnect the headlight for extended
> running?
It really won't hurt anything but you're better off leaving the system
alone and staying legal. In my state and I suspect all 50 states are
the same, you are required to have the headlight on while riding. You
are in the USA, correct?
It's an 82. So the headlight is supposed to stay off whilst cranking
the starter? Best idea I've heard, will look at the wiring diagram to
locate the exact relay or timer that does this.
>
> Adding a switch is unnecessary. As you say, the bike's charging system
> is designed to have the headlight on all the time when the engine is
> running and has enough capacity to charge the battery while running the
> headlight.
>
When the battery is a bit low it takes too much to energize both the
headlight and the starter.......
Will go to work on this.
Thanks,
Biker Dude
> It's an 82. So the headlight is supposed to stay off whilst cranking
> the starter? Best idea I've heard, will look at the wiring diagram to
> locate the exact relay or timer that does this.
On US spec bikes I've owned and ridden, and now on modern EU-spec bikes
(one of which I own), pressing the starter button disengages the
headlight, yes.>
>
>
> >
> > Adding a switch is unnecessary. As you say, the bike's charging system
> > is designed to have the headlight on all the time when the engine is
> > running and has enough capacity to charge the battery while running the
> > headlight.
> >
>
> When the battery is a bit low it takes too much to energize both the
> headlight and the starter.......
Fit a new battery.
I checked my genuine Kawasaki KZ750 workshop manual and I think I gave
you some bad information. The "Junction Box" which keeps the headlight
off until the engine is running was not introduced until the 1984 models.
I gave away my KZ550 manual when I sold my 82 GPz550 so I can't look up
the wiring diagram for that particular model but looking at the parts
fiche on http://www.buykawasaki.com shows that the '82 KZ550-C3 (LTD)
has what is called a 'Reserve Lighting Device' which Kawasaki included
in an attempt to cater to the USA requirement of always having the
headlight on. If one of the filaments burns out, the RLD will turn on
the other one. Note that this device does not keep the headlight off
until the engine is running or even just when cranking the starter.
Hondas of the late 70s and early 80s (I know my two '81s had this)
opened the headlight circuit while the starter button was pressed.
>> Adding a switch is unnecessary. �As you say, the bike's charging system
>> is designed to have the headlight on all the time when the engine is
>> running and has enough capacity to charge the battery while running the
>> headlight.
>>
>
> When the battery is a bit low it takes too much to energize both the
> headlight and the starter.......
>
> Will go to work on this.
Hopefully you haven't wasted any time due to my bad information re:
the nonexistent Junction Box (AKA "J-Box").
Your battery shouldn't be that low. The amount of current the headlight
takes compared to what the starter draws is pretty small. Either you
have a battery that needs replacing or a charging system problem or both.
If the battery is more than 3 years old you might as well replace it.
If you are determined to add a switch to disable the headlight you could
ask one of our Canadian or UK friends to help you locate a headlight
switch assembly from a non-USA model. I'm betting that the headlight
wiring harness is the same but there is just a shorting bar inside the
left handlebar switch housing where the hi/lo beam selector switch is.
> If you are determined to add a switch to disable the headlight you could
> ask one of our Canadian or UK friends to help you locate a headlight
> switch assembly from a non-USA model. I'm betting that the headlight
> wiring harness is the same but there is just a shorting bar inside the
> left handlebar switch housing where the hi/lo beam selector switch is.
I'm pretty sure I've got a Z650 one which will do the trick. I'd
willingly part with it for free as long as the postage is paid.
Which reminds me- my '77 KZ650B1 had a headlight on/off switch, if I am
not mistaken '78 was the first model year to have headlight switches
removed on USA models. So if the OP can locate one of these at a
breaker's yard he might be sorted if he doesn't want to take up your
kind offer.
I still say he shouldn't worry about it, I never had a problem starting
my '82 GPz550, just rode it regularly which kept the battery topped up.
If he's not riding the bike enough and doesn't use a battery tender,
then he might have a weak battery occasionally.
> I still say he shouldn't worry about it, I never had a problem starting
> my '82 GPz550, just rode it regularly which kept the battery topped up.
> If he's not riding the bike enough and doesn't use a battery tender,
> then he might have a weak battery occasionally.
Well, yes, that's my feeling too.
Thinking of lights, the K11 managed to pop two tail light bulbs in the
space of a month recently. No apparent reason. It's been fine since,
but I've got a spare packed in the fairing stash box now. It's got a
warning light for rear filament failure: the last bike I remember that
had that was my old 1976 Yamaha XS650.
And the GN250 needs a new headlight bulb. The interior of the bulb is
all cloudy, like milk, and has a crack, so I assume bulb failure
rather than over-charging. I checked the charging rate, and it's spot
on.
> Thinking of lights, the K11 managed to pop two tail light bulbs in the
> space of a month recently. No apparent reason. It's been fine since,
> but I've got a spare packed in the fairing stash box now. It's got a
> warning light for rear filament failure: the last bike I remember that
> had that was my old 1976 Yamaha XS650.
I'd make sure the tail light assembly isn't loose or missing a rubber
bit- other than excess volts, the most likely cause of repeated bulb
failure is vibration.
Yeah, I wondered about that myself, and checked it over, but it all
seems OK, and it hasn't popped any bulbs in a while now.
Some original equipment stop/tail bulbs had a wire support in the middle of
the tail filament.
The last bulbs I bought was a box of 10 Lucas which don't have the support -
but I can remember a time I tried numerous suppliers for the supported
filament types without any success.
> Some original equipment stop/tail bulbs had a wire support in the middle of
> the tail filament.
Oh yeah, I remember them....
It'd be pretty easy to cobble up a normally closed relay
for the headlight that opens when the solenoid for
the starter is energized.
I know it wasn't the original question but another aspect of this is
that old bikes of many brands didn't charge much at idle, if at all, so
if you were either repeatedly starting or running a non-magneto/battery
ignition type at idle, say while synch'ing carbs or some other
troubleshooting, it was pretty easy to run the battery down enough that
after a dozen or so starts with a fair battery you might have to boost
to start. On my friend's old CB750 which had lots of problems I used to
disconnect the headlight before working on it, but that was a bit of a
PITA. I had a two-dollar switch on a troublesome scooter of mine and if
the 750 had been my own bike, I would have just put a simple toggle
switch in series with the headlight. Some people might complain that
they'd forget to turn on the light after starting, but to me it's the
same as having a side-stand that isn't interlocked with the ignition,
pretty soon you acquire a rote mechanical routine of steps you do before
you ride off, personally I think anybody who does it a different way
every time without thinking will probably have more dangerous problems
when riding, those might be the same people who don't know when their
speedo cable broke or are surprised to be missing a brake at the bottom
of the first hill!
I have a half-baked theory about this. Really good hockey players
always seem to suit up with the same pattern, eg., left skate first or
what have you. I've never seen one step on the ice with bootlaces
undone. I think bikers who have a long record of safe riding are
similar, they will nearly always do the same thing in any given
situation, including preparing to set off.
> I know it wasn't the original question but another aspect of this is
> that old bikes of many brands didn't charge much at idle, if at all, so
> if you were either repeatedly starting or running a non-magneto/battery
> ignition type at idle, say while synch'ing carbs or some other
> troubleshooting, it was pretty easy to run the battery down enough that
> after a dozen or so starts with a fair battery you might have to boost
> to start.
I've got to say I *never* had that problem, and still don't with the old
Honda I steward.
If you have something like a 12A/h battery, which is what my 400 Four
has, and the bike starts easily, you can do an awful lot of cranking on
the starter motor (which draws the most current of any electrical
component) before flattening the battery.
That said, I do remember conking out in London on an old airhead BMW
because its battery was a bit aged and I was running around town all day
on the idle jets with the lights on, and it never got a proper charge.
My `01 shadow 750 has the same arrangement . As long as the ignition
switch is on ? the headlight is on.As soon as you push the start
button ? the headlight goes out UNTIL the engine catches and you
release the start button.
Putting a switch in series with the headlight isnt a biggy.It wont
increase the output voltage of the alternator /generator but it will
increase the ability of the charging circuit to recharge your battery
quicker.
Hope this helps
Ed
There is a potential problem with that scheme, the battery can drop to about
half voltage under cranking load and may cause the relay to drop out when
you least want it to.
Obviously the weaker the battery the more likely the relay to drop out, and
the more you need it not to.
If I was going to modify a bike so the headlamp was only on when the engine
was running, I'd add a second low power rectifier to the alternator's AC
output, this alone might not hold the relay on while idling at a standstill
in a traffic jam, there is also the issue of excessive output with permanent
magnet alternators, so I suspect a little bit of electronics would be needed
to make it work just right.
I could be wrong, but I think a typical arrangement would have the
normally closed relay power the solenoid when it opened and
broke the connection to the headlight.
If your 12 v. battery drops more than a couple volts, it's not
likely to do anything very useful when the solenoid kicks in
anyway.
> If I was going to modify a bike so the headlamp was only on when the engine
> was running, I'd add a second low power rectifier to the alternator's AC
> output, this alone might not hold the relay on while idling at a standstill
> in a traffic jam, there is also the issue of excessive output with permanent
> magnet alternators, so I suspect a little bit of electronics would be needed
> to make it work just right.
See above.
>There is a potential problem with that scheme, the battery can drop to about
>half voltage under cranking load and may cause the relay to drop out when
>you least want it to.
An in series toggle switch is the simplest solution. I'm sure they've
designed the circuitry in a way you wont fry anything if the light is
off. After all, bulbs do blow all on their own and a circuit designed
so alternator/generator output starts cooking the circuitry when you
blow a bulb is a completely idiotic design.
--
Email - rsgi...@tampabay.rr.borg
Replace borg with com
"Ubuntu" - an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".
They certainly exist - those little 2-stroke step-through's of the 70s &
80's used very precarious regulation systems, one I had, the battery (for
indicators, horn stoplight etc) was charged by a single diode from a tapping
on the AC lighting coil. The battery charging current was supposed to
regulate the AC lighting coil but obviously only did on alternate half
cycles - the regulation was flaky at best.
On one occasion I had the battery fuse blow, causing complete loss of
regulation on the AC lighting and instant blowing of every bulb on that
circuit - I was giving it some along an unlit country lane at the time!
|>> that the loss of the load would spike some voltages and then possibly
|>> harm something expensive such as an electronic ignition system.
|>
|>Adding a switch is unnecessary. As you say, the bike's charging system
|>is designed to have the headlight on all the time when the engine is
|>running and has enough capacity to charge the battery while running the
|>headlight.
Sometimes the battery voltage will drop to %20/12.0volts and some
even less at long intersection stop lights.
This is somewhat dependant on the ReserveCapacity/Ah high quality of
the battery, and a high quality "spaciality" m-cycle battery is pretty pricy
or rare these days.
My headlights draw 60x2=120 watts from an 8amp starting battery,
needless to say the alarm leeching doesn't help much either.
Adding an inline switch will confuse the ECU/ECM's or general
electronic ignition system's reading and cause an abnormal conflict
somewhere, unless you really know the bikes wiring....and other "fixes".
Good Luck
Bob
> Adding an inline switch will confuse the ECU/ECM's or general
> electronic ignition system's reading and cause an abnormal conflict
> somewhere, unless you really know the bikes wiring....and other "fixes".
No, adding a headlight cutout switch won't "confuse" the ECU or the
electronic ignition system or cause an abnormal conflict somewhere.
I'd suggest you post here only about subjects you know something about.
That'll be a short list, then ;-)