Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Do SBK rules prohibit oval pistons ?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Zak Smith

unread,
Jul 15, 1999, 3:00:00 AM7/15/99
to
Do SBK rules prohibit oval pistons? I was just thinking that a team
could get both the 250cc advantage for being a "twin" and also get
the advantages of having 4 cylinders (lots of valve area, right?).

-z

--
# Zak Smith, EE/Unix Geek, INTJ. z...@computer.org http://apollo.demigod.org
# Fort Collins, CO, USA. "Powers are cool." - me

Michael Guest

unread,
Jul 15, 1999, 3:00:00 AM7/15/99
to
Zak Smith <z...@apollo.priv> wrote:
: Do SBK rules prohibit oval pistons? I was just thinking that a team

: could get both the 250cc advantage for being a "twin" and also get
: the advantages of having 4 cylinders (lots of valve area, right?).
:
: -z

No. However, to see where this idea fails, refer to the Honda NR750.
It was a prototype bike with a V-4 750cc motor with oval pistons. The
oval pistons allowed 32 valves to be used but the additional friction of
the pistons offset the gains from the valves. Neat bike, not worth the
money tho.

Michael

Dr Ivan D Reid, muSR Facility

unread,
Jul 16, 1999, 3:00:00 AM7/16/99
to
In article <slrn7os1k...@apollo.demigod.org>, Zak Smith wrote:
>Do SBK rules prohibit oval pistons? I was just thinking that a team
>could get both the 250cc advantage for being a "twin" and also get
>the advantages of having 4 cylinders (lots of valve area, right?).

I think you'll find that FIM general rules (to which all class
and formula rules are subsidiary) specify circular pistons. This was,
IIRC, brought in as a direct result of Honda trying oval pistons in a
500 cc GP four-stroke.

--
Ivan Reid, Paul Scherrer Institute, CH. http://musr0.psi.ch/ re...@psi.ch
MuSR99 Conference, Les Diablerets: http://www1.psi.ch/~musr99/musr99.html
GSX600F, RG250WD. SI=2.66 "You Porsche. Me pass!" DoD #484
JKLO# 003, 005 WP7# 3000 UKMC#00009
KotPT -- "for stupidity above and beyond the call of duty".

K.J Wilkens

unread,
Jul 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM7/17/99
to

I think they will treat an oval piston cyclinder as a twin. hence there
is no advantage in it anymore.
KJ
--
Dog eat dog, eat cat to.
Bon Scott

Jantah

unread,
Jul 17, 1999, 3:00:00 AM7/17/99
to
On Sat, 17 Jul 1999 00:09:06 -0700, "K.J Wilkens"
<k.j.w...@kpn.com> wrote:


>I think they will treat an oval piston cyclinder as a twin. hence there
>is no advantage in it anymore.

I found this in the FIM rulebook:

About engine capacity:
When a cylinder bore is not circular the cross sectional area must be
determined by a suitable geometrical method or calculation, then
multiplied by the stroke to determine capacity.

About the number of cilinders:
The number of cylinders in an engine is determined by the number of
combustion chambers. If separate combustion spaces are used they must
be connected by an unrestricted passage of minimum cross sectional
area at least 50 % of the total inlet port area.

I would say that oval pistons are allowed, and if the shape of the
combustion chamber is correct, a 1000cc twin is allowed.
--
Jan
jan...@big.hand.com
(replace big.hand with bigfoot to email Jan)

0 new messages