Artwork by the late David Mann
Grumbler
I used to see in the first few years of Easyriders:
http://home.att.net/~knucklehead-47/dmann.htm
-=Grumbler
Sportster4Eva
bigger when you open them individually.
Paulie-Boy
(sometimes)
jjs
news:_1j2d.5$G5...@bos-service2.ext.ray.com...
> Pretty cool...It would be most excellent if the pics were a little bigger
> when you open them individually.
Copyright issues.
AH#49
The size of computer image opening up is protected by "copyright
issues?"
Please explain that, or did I miss the humor?
BillyBob-JoeJack
"AH#49" <Ep...@salts.gov> wrote in message
news:4149C57A...@salts.gov...
Think about it for a few seconds,. You may actually get it.
bbjj
AH#49
You don't get it, or you would have explained it yerself.
I'll wait fer him, thank you.
jjs
> The size of computer image opening up is protected by "copyright
> issues?" Please explain that, or did I miss the humor?
You are in dire need of an education. That's all.
AH#49
Ahhh. You can't explain what you meant either.
Thank you. That's all I needed.
BillyBob-JoeJack
Wait all you want and please hold your breath while doing so.
It's (Rocket Science) so you don't qualify for an explanation. :-0
bbjj
Inita
"AH#49 said:"
“jjs said:”
"Sportster4Eva said:"
<Pretty cool...It would be most excellent if
the pics were a little bigger when you
open them individually.>
<Copyright issues.>
<The size of computer image opening up
is protected by "copyright issues?"
Please explain that, or did I miss the
humor?>
<Think about it for a few seconds,. You
may actually get it.>
My thanks to Grumbler for posting the link to the work of the now
immortal Mann. A round on me for everyone in tribute to "THE Mann".
I've been in "HOG" heaven, so I guess "DweebTvDonna" gets to settle this
one!
I've been saving my favorite pics in folders and they are even more
beautiful on my 25" color tv than they are on a monitor, _fer sure_! I
only wish I had a color cartridge for my printer, dammit!
Sorry jjs, no copyright infringement safeguards of any kind, maybe
there's a
problem with your computer?
Peace,
Donna
AH#49
I ain't waiting, "BBJJ" .
(By the way, is that you stuttering after all those protien
injections offered you by men in glory holes?)
You seem to be "obsessed" with me for some rather strange reason.
Care to explain that?
jjs
> news:4149C86A...@salts.gov...
> You don't get it, or you would have explained it yerself.
> I'll wait fer him, thank you.
I hope you were holding your breath.
In any event, there's a copyright issue wherein the interest of the person
who displays the image might benefit more than the copyright holder, except
under certain circumstances usually considered "fair use". The case at hand
is not specifically under Fair Use.
Offering a considerably diminished sample of an image for the purpose of
selling an original (which can be a copy) is usually considered appropriate.
If a person offerers a print-ready, full resolution copy of Mann's work then
he might be in for a copyright infringement complaint. A more specific
example: if Easy Rider magazine owns an image of Manns and reproduced it
once at, say, 5x7" and you put up the full 5x7 image on a web site in order
to promote "How to use anon mailers", your ass would be in a sling.
All these circumstances are subject first to issues regarding whether a
copyright exists (it can expire, or be declared by the copyright holder to
be public doman, no strings attached), who owns the copyright, and then the
specifics of copyright law on a case-by-case basis.
Now if Cuda is reading this, she can comment from the point of view of a
licensed property rights attorney. How'd I do?
AH#49
>
> "AH#49" <Ep...@salts.gov> wrote in message
> > news:4149C86A...@salts.gov...
>
> > You don't get it, or you would have explained it yerself.
> > I'll wait fer him, thank you.
>
> I hope you were holding your breath.
Well, I didn't turn blue like you were hoping!
> In any event, there's a copyright issue wherein the interest of the person
> who displays the image might benefit more than the copyright holder, except
> under certain circumstances usually considered "fair use". The case at hand
> is not specifically under Fair Use.
>
> Offering a considerably diminished sample of an image for the purpose of
> selling an original (which can be a copy) is usually considered appropriate.
> If a person offerers a print-ready, full resolution copy of Mann's work then
> he might be in for a copyright infringement complaint. A more specific
> example: if Easy Rider magazine owns an image of Manns and reproduced it
> once at, say, 5x7" and you put up the full 5x7 image on a web site in order
> to promote "How to use anon mailers", your ass would be in a sling.
I understand how copyright laws work.
I don't know about anon remailers, so stop that insinuation.
I hardly believe that Dave Mann's works were originally done on a
5x7INCH canvas, but anyway, USING others works of art for PROMOTION
or sales is, as far as I know, against the law if the OWNERS of it
still have ownership or rights to said works of art.
What does THAT have to do with how large the image is seen on a
COMPUTER screen when you click on it to "enlarge" it to fill the
screen a little better?
Otherwise, yer almost saying that it's perfectly OK to use his
SMALLER immages for capital gains!
And no, that is also not proper or legal, without proper
authorization!
YOU can not use ANY insignia/art form/etc. that has been
copyrighted, REGARDLESS of size, to promote, or for gain.
> All these circumstances are subject first to issues regarding whether a
> copyright exists (it can expire, or be declared by the copyright holder to
> be public doman, no strings attached), who owns the copyright, and then the
> specifics of copyright law on a case-by-case basis.
I agree!
I never tried to argue otherwise!
But the guestion was; Size as to how it appears on ones computer
monitor?
ANYTHING can be "resized"! Just ask "Key" in A.B.P.M.H.! :>
Use and abuse of said copyrighted art is a totally different matter.
> Now if Cuda is reading this, she can comment from the point of view of a
> licensed property rights attorney. How'd I do?
Very well!
You done good, to an extent, and you refrained from being rude!
BRAVISIMO!
Did I mention that I tried to "bring" Cuda into "Alt.Revenge" MANY
years ago FOR just that legal expertise she has, and "we" needed,
and that she was "interested" at one point?...but declined?
Regardless, thanks John!
You seem to be a person that is becoming civil once again!
I applaud the hell out of that!
I ask, I receive some information.
See how that works?
Thank you!
Stir Fried Pan
>jjs wrote:
>>
>> "AH#49" <Ep...@salts.gov> wrote in message
>> > news:4149C86A...@salts.gov...
>>
>> > You don't get it, or you would have explained it yerself.
>> > I'll wait fer him, thank you.
>>
>> I hope you were holding your breath.
>
>Well, I didn't turn blue like you were hoping!
Fuck. Hopefully we'll read your obituary tomorrow then.
>> In any event, there's a copyright issue wherein the interest of the person
>> who displays the image might benefit more than the copyright holder, except
>> under certain circumstances usually considered "fair use". The case at hand
>> is not specifically under Fair Use.
>>
>> Offering a considerably diminished sample of an image for the purpose of
>> selling an original (which can be a copy) is usually considered appropriate.
>> If a person offerers a print-ready, full resolution copy of Mann's work then
>> he might be in for a copyright infringement complaint. A more specific
>> example: if Easy Rider magazine owns an image of Manns and reproduced it
>> once at, say, 5x7" and you put up the full 5x7 image on a web site in order
>> to promote "How to use anon mailers", your ass would be in a sling.
>
> I understand <snip crapola>
nothing
>> All these circumstances are subject first to issues regarding whether a
>> copyright exists (it can expire, or be declared by the copyright holder to
>> be public doman, no strings attached), who owns the copyright, and then the
>> specifics of copyright law on a case-by-case basis.
>
>I agree!
slrup
> I never tried to argue otherwise!
> But the guestion was; Size as to how it appears on ones computer
>monitor?
>ANYTHING can be "resized"! Just ask "Key" in A.B.P.M.H.! :>
>Use and abuse of said copyrighted art is a totally different matter.
>
>
>> Now if Cuda is reading this, she can comment from the point of view of a
>> licensed property rights attorney. How'd I do?
>
>Very well!
> You done good, to an extent, and you refrained from being rude!
Not me.
Fuck you.
>BRAVISIMO!
>
>Did I mention that I tried to "bring" Cuda into "Alt.Revenge" MANY
>years ago FOR just that legal expertise she has, and "we" needed,
>and that she was "interested" at one point?...but declined?
>
>Regardless, thanks John!
> You seem to be a person that is becoming civil once again!
>I applaud the hell out of that!
>
>I ask, I receive some information.
> See how that works?
>
>Thank you!
FOAD
AH#49
You are abscessed, obsessed, and a faggot by you own admission!
Show yer face in public, and YOU will become mulch.
See how that works, you aids/hiv ridden bone smoker?
Spunky the Tuna
>
> Show yer face in public, and YOU will become mulch.
YOU making threats? Oh, fucking please!
You really ought to go back to playing with your acne ridden teen aged
friends on the dirty cartoon newsgroups or alt.wish-I-was-man-enough-for-
real-revenge-but-i'm-just-a-simpering-punk-so-I'll-just-pretend-on-my-
computer.
They might actually take you seriously.
It's hard to imagine anybody here thinking you could follow up on any kind
of threat.
--
Spunky the Tuna
BS69 SENS DOF#R LSMFT EIEIO PDQ op cit
the more hurry, the speed...
Stir Fried Pan
>Stir Fried Pan wrote:(snip)
>
>You are abscessed, obsessed, and a faggot by you own admission!
Prove it.
<watch this>
>Show yer face in public, and YOU will become mulch.
You're a real fucking tough faggot hiding behind your keyboard ain't
ya sweetcakes. Word is you hide behind your wifey's dress when
threatened.
>See how that works, you aids/hiv ridden bone smoker?
Nah...don't believe we're related, cocksmoker.
AH#49
>
> AH#49 <Ep...@salts.gov> wrote in news:414A1A14...@salts.gov:
>
> >
> > Show yer face in public, and YOU will become mulch.
>
> YOU making threats? Oh, fucking please!
Are YOU are the twerp that I was talking to?
If so, admit your mental diarrhea now, you coward!
I'll make sure I eat somthing really formibable before I rip yer
head off and shit down the remainder of your scrawny neck and fill
yer skull with somthing more usefull.
Otherwise, shut up and leave, Punky! :>
Remember when YOU told ME to get lost, my little pet fish?
You too are SO BOLD!
WHY are you also so "obsessed" with me as well?
You look like the faggot that chases me from NG to NG!
Let it go, little one!
Stir Fried Pan
>Spunky the Tuna wrote:
>>
>> AH#49 <Ep...@salts.gov> wrote in news:414A1A14...@salts.gov:
>>
>> >
>> > Show yer face in public, and YOU will become mulch.
>>
>> YOU making threats? Oh, fucking please!
>
>Are <SMACK!!!>
Shaddup when yer superiors are talking ya fucking dumpster diving cock
smoker.
Sheez...some people just ain't got no manners.
;;;
-snip the usual blabberling-
Moron.
OneGuy
Still the shit tard you always were I see. How's that "eatery" you lying
sak-o-crap?
og
Spunky the Tuna
> Spunky the Tuna wrote:
>>
>> AH#49 <Ep...@salts.gov> wrote:
>> >
>> > Show yer face in public, and YOU will become mulch.
>>
>> YOU making threats? Oh, fucking please!
>
> Are YOU are the twerp that I was talking to?
Oh, come on. Even someone as gothically dysfunctional as you are has to
know that you're not involved in a private conversation here. It's clear
that I was referring to the high comedy of you making threats to anyone.
It's almost as funny as you offering mechanical advice to anyone.
No, it's funnier than that.
> I'll make sure I eat somthing really formibable before I rip yer
> head off and shit down the remainder of your scrawny neck and fill
> yer skull with somthing more usefull.
More threats? You couldn't possibly think that I'd take a threat from a
pansy like you seriously! Nobody capable of breathing on their own could
concievably be intimidated by you.
That's just too funny.
C'mon, flex for me again Alfalfa! Show me those virtual biceps you pencil
necked loser.