Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Why not amateurs?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

sturd

unread,
Jul 23, 2008, 12:27:38 PM7/23/08
to

http://www.cyclenews.com/ShowStory.asp?HeadlineID=12694

"Dingman added that the new rules will not affect the 2009
AMA amateur classes."

and

"The most logical and cost-effective approach is to adopt
the FIM 94dBA sound standard for 2009 because the
manufacturers have already developed the engineering
to meet the FIM 94dBA motocross sound-level standard
and measurement method for 2008," Dingman continued.

So why not amateur classes?


Go fast. Take chances.
Mike S.

XR650L_Dave

unread,
Jul 23, 2008, 12:55:59 PM7/23/08
to


Saw something about 'amateurs' in the tag line and thought I was in
the wrong forum for a second...


Dave

Craig

unread,
Jul 24, 2008, 2:19:28 PM7/24/08
to
On Jul 23, 12:27 pm, sturd <mikesturdevant...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Because everyone knows that amateurs need more power.

Craig

sturd

unread,
Jul 24, 2008, 3:35:54 PM7/24/08
to
Craig notes:

> Because everyone knows that amateurs need more power.

Speaking of stupid things the AMA does, rumor picked up
at Vintage Days is that they are trying to sell the museum.

http://www.motorcyclemuseum.org/

0 new messages