What's the difference between the MX and enduro models of most brands?
Kawasaki, for example... is the KLX actually the KX 250 frame,
suspension, bored out motor, etc, along with lights and maybe a heavy
fly-wheel?
How big IS the difference between the "enduro" and MX versions of the
various brands?...
Thanks In Advance!
Pierre Karsmaker (NOT!!! :-) )
In article <nHU=ONYRcEevbrUwoSD=+gsd...@4ax.com>, GAzoo
<Na...@nospam.net> wrote:
> What's the difference between the MX and enduro models of most brands?
> Kawasaki, for example... is the KLX actually the KX 250 frame,
> suspension, bored out motor, etc, along with lights and maybe a heavy
> fly-wheel?
>
> How big IS the difference between the "enduro" and MX versions of the
> various brands?...
The KLX is a 4 stroke.... Totally diff to a KX..
The only bikes close are the YZ250 and WR250 and the KTM's
--
*Ride it Like you Stole it!!*
Matt 99 YZ400F
"I Vanna Thump-a-lot"
Rubber Chicken Racing
> > What's the difference between the MX and enduro models of most brands?
> > Kawasaki, for example... is the KLX actually the KX 250 frame,
> > suspension, bored out motor, etc, along with lights and maybe a heavy
> > fly-wheel?
> >
> > How big IS the difference between the "enduro" and MX versions of the
> > various brands?...
>
>
> The KLX is a 4 stroke.... Totally diff to a KX..
> The only bikes close are the YZ250 and WR250 and the KTM's
And the Huskies, and the the TM's, and the GasGas's, and the Alfer's, and
the RM/RMX, and the Husabergs..................
In article <3840...@news.syd.fl.net.au>, "FromVentersd"
<frie...@ftl.net.au> wrote:
> And the Huskies, and the the TM's, and the GasGas's, and the Alfer's, and
> the RM/RMX, and the Husabergs...............
I was tring to keep it simple!!! :¬))
GAzoo wrote:
> Hello!
>
> What's the difference between the MX and enduro models of most brands?
> Kawasaki, for example... is the KLX actually the KX 250 frame,
> suspension, bored out motor, etc, along with lights and maybe a heavy
> fly-wheel?
>
> How big IS the difference between the "enduro" and MX versions of the
> various brands?...
>
> Thanks In Advance!
>
> Pierre Karsmaker (NOT!!! :-) )
--
Scott C Wilson (Carolina's)
1995 KTM 300 E/XC
1983 SUZ 500 RM
1978 YAM 175 DT
Don't get me wrong, a KDX is a fine trail bike, I was just pointing out that
it weighs more than a 250 for less power than a 125. I know that for trail
riding, low end torque is more important and the KDX does well here. Also,
when I have sat on a KDX it feels a lot wider and heavier than an MX bike.
Reeko
99KX250
98XR400
Scott Wilson wrote in message <3843C7B8...@netscape.net>...
Just to list a few. I am not saying they didn't make mistakes, only that
these are the numbers they published. There is a big diference between
torque and HP. I believe that the KDX makes more torque at lower RPMs then
other bikes. Also it is interesting to note (from the charts) that the 125's
generate their peak HP at about 11,500 RPMs compared to most 250's at 8,000.
They did not chart the KDX however, only listed its peak HP.
Reeko
99KX250
98XR400
Bud wrote in message ...
>err, less hp than a 125? I read it was 26 for the average 125 and 29 for a
>stock kdx. Doing the standard mods to a kdx should push it somewhat over
>30hp..
>
>Reeko <re...@nomail.com> wrote in message
>news:820v44$5...@news.or.intel.com...