Thanks,
Ted
--
Mike Gordon AMA 320990
Remember; RC Pylon Racing, the Ultimate Thrill,
when sex and drugs just ain't enough
Enjoy,
Mark
>
>I like my MVVS. I 40 have had no problems with it at all. However there
>are other members in my club who have had a lot of problems with theirs.
>Go figure. Maybe I'm just lucky.
>
I got the same about 6-7 years ago, it had a liner/piston destroyed in breaking
in, looks like a piece casting came loose, I would inspect before running for
any shavings etc in crankcase, IT WAS repaired free under warranty, and
the good part, it has throttle response like no other engine I've owned, and
power is great. Would I buy another, YES.
Adam Tucker
AMA 520901
Hurst Tx
Remove ".NET" to Reply by Email
I have seen a few of them run fantastic. Easy starting, instant throttle
responce, tic over idle, great power, lightweight. I bought a 45 and had hi
expectations of it from what i read online and the few I seen run so well.
Unfortunatly in the end the thing would not put out good power at all.
Eventually sold the engine and it ended up on a trainer where it still is.
Would I buy another, maybe. But I'd want to be able to return it if the
performance claims were not achived. Seems like their quality control could
use some help.
BradC
"Ted Jankowski" <tjjing...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:n5Z18.4888$X4.4...@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
Highly recommended from my experience.
r/MajSpit
"Ted Jankowski" <tjjing...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:n5Z18.4888$X4.4...@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
can seem loud (probibly is).
sometimes burns out glow plug (as soon as it runs out of fuel).
burns lots of fuel (and holes in the sky).
others at the club complain (i dont think i can hear them over my heart).
take it easy on break in (mine required several flights until full
potential was realized).
if you can get over these little (in my opinion) problems (as i have)
this will probibly just be your first mvvs (I intend to buy another)
tho only other problem is all the others at the club wondering what is
wrong with there engine when you scream past there plane!
I know Robert Kosar who runs MVVS. If you had a sick NEW MVVS .45,
he'd have replaced it. Did you ask? What muffler ot pipe did you
use? You're saying you sold it and it's on a trainer? I have a tuff
time believing that. A 17K-rpm hand-fitted screamer on a trainer and
running sick? I just have a tuff time believing that.
CR
I bought an MVVS .25 second-hand on Ebay. Still don't know if I bought
a turd or a gem. The engine has gobs of compression, came with the
mini tuned silencer, and is smaller in outside dimensions, not to
mention lighter, than my other Ebay purchase, a Norvel .15BB AME. Too
bad the MVVS isn't legal in the Class A combat arena :)
> admin@loopback $LOGIN@localhost $LOGNAME@localhost
$USER@localhost
> $USER@$HOST -h1024@localhost ro...@mailloop.com
Bottom line: Powerful, dependable, fuel efficient and not louder than
anything else at the field flying a big(ger) 2 stroker.
v/r, MajSpit
ps- I don't get paid or compensated for putting MVVS on a pedestal. I was
quite hesitant to buy this engine. I like solid engines; I have OS, YS and
a DA-100. I didn't want the MVVS because I didn't know much about it.
Morris Hobbies talked me into it, and told it like it was: A Great Engine.
The End.
"ed" <ededg...@yahoo.ca> wrote in message
news:b6aa1ef0.02011...@posting.google.com...
It's been through heck too. It crashed nose first, full throttle, at
more than 150MPH. Pictures of it are on my R/C webpage listed below.
Go to the 1st diamond dust page to see where it has been... then look
at the 2nd dust page for its resurrection.
I expected to have to at least replace the bearings after the crash
(which buried the engine up to its glow plug in the dirt)... but they
are nearly good as new (and no leaks ever).
Needless to say that I'm impressed.
Andy Steere
http://astro.umsystem.edu/andy/rc/
"Ted Jankowski" <tjjing...@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<n5Z18.4888$X4.4...@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net>...
I (now) love mvvs and am proud of it!!!!
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002 17:39:31 GMT, "Ted Jankowski"
<tjjing...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>My only MVVS experience is with their 40 GRRT pylon racing engine.
>What a brute! VERY LOUD! Turns a 7.2x8.6 APC at 20K on the ground
>and really unloads in the air. Powers my diamond dust well past
>150MPH.
>
Why that combo? I like the apc 8X10 @ 15k, the speed, who knows, too fast
for most.
enuf said
Charles & Peggy Robinson <ccro...@ktc.com> wrote in
news:3C48C25A...@ktc.com:
r/ MajSpit
"typo" <fah...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns919B7B97...@24.2.10.15...
That prop is based upon the normal operating RPM range recommended to
me by Morris Hobbies. The GRRT is designed (ported and piped) to
produce its best power above 20,000 RPM. I am using the Q-500 R/C
carb (which has a bigger opening than the carb on my 61FX!).
But hey, if your Dust is "fast enough"... then by all means enjoy it!
You might try an 8x9. Should get on the pipe better (assuming you
are using the MVVS tuned-pipe made for that engine), giving more RPM's
(~19K). My calculator says that should translate into both a 20MPH
increase in speed, plus significantly more thrust (easier launching).
Mine is maxed out for speed, nearing the edge of having just barely
enough thrust for a solid takeoff. Even so, it has "unlimited
vertical" (defined as "straight up like a rocket for as far as the eye
can see").
Andy Steere
http://astro.umsystem.edu/andy/rc/
rck...@aol.com.net (RCKRZY1) wrote in message news:<20020119114542...@mb-ms.aol.com>...
I've had mixed results with the smaller MVVS glow engines but have a very
different attitude toward the larger, gasoline engines. I just started (and
test-flew) an MVVS 1.60 gasoline engine (26 cc) and am extremely pleased with
the engine. Just a tad heavier than a typical 1.20 (4) cycle glow engine, but it
will outrun them. It also behaves very well. Bear in mind that this engine now
has about 10 minutes total time on it so I expect it will be even better with
more running time (compression is still very low indicating that the ring isn't
even close to seated yet). Power is excellent (18-6 @8,200 RPM), vibration is
very low, quality of fit and finish is very high, the ignition is extremely
small and works quite well, and of course it comes with a Walbro carb.. Add to
all of this the price, which is less than a YS .91 costs and I think they may
have a real winner here. As it's so new I can't really tell yet but just maybe
this engine will join a very few others on my list of favorites- the .25 and .40
OS FP, any YS four cycle engine, and the Moki 1.8.
Brian
http://members.home.net/bdfelice/
"You can always tell an engineer.....
"But you can't tell him much."
>
>Mine is maxed out for speed, nearing the edge of having just barely
>enough thrust for a solid takeoff. Even so, it has "unlimited
>vertical" (defined as "straight up like a rocket for as far as the eye
>can see").
>
>Andy Steere
>http://astro.umsystem.edu/andy/rc/
>
I love coming out of split S dive and level it at the end of runway then
pull/yank it
straight up midway down the runway, too cool.
--
Pé, from Arcen, south-east Netherlands
http://www.reivers.myweb.nl/mvvs.htm
to reply: name=pe domain= reivers.myweb.nl
"Ted Jankowski" <tjjing...@earthlink.net> schreef in bericht
news:n5Z18.4888$X4.4...@newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net...
--
Pé, from Arcen, south-east Netherlands
http://www.reivers.myweb.nl/mvvs.htm
to reply: name=pe domain= reivers.myweb.nl
"ed" <ededg...@yahoo.ca> schreef in bericht
news:b6aa1ef0.02011...@posting.google.com...
L8R
Paul
Wishing you a Happy and Peaceful New Year
Just Engines; (http://www.justengines.unseen.org)
for ALL your engine and engine accessory needs;