A salesman (<g>) said to us that the Elite 3000 was not very good
(bad aftermarket services with B&L, Leupold is stronger and easy to
sight, etc.) and he suggested the Leupold Vari-X II 3x-9x 40mm.
There is 200$Can between the B&L and Leupold.
I would like to know if the Elite 3000 is a good scope for
hunting and target shooting? (I know that the Leupold is better, but
don't want to spend another 400$ (2 scopes) if the E3000 is good)
Thanks,
Jonathan
------------------
Jonathan Marcotte
Montreal, (Quebec)
Canada
___/)__/)________/)_____________________________________________
Jonathan Marcotte
marc...@grics.qc.ca
Societe GRICS
DSA - Taxation scolaire
Montreal (QUEBEC)
(514) 251-3700 Poste 3924
PGP Id: 17DEBA35
PGP Fingerprint: 00DC 62F2 C1D9 C4AD 22A6 7C9B 9104 994F
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:
http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/
I own an Elite 3000 2x-7x and an Elite 4000 2.5x-10x. I also own a
Leupold Vari-X III 1.5x to 5x and until I recently sold it, a VariX III
6.5x to 20x.
They are all good scopes and I have been pleased with all of them. I do
not like the Leupold Vari-X II because it does not have click
adjustments. As far as clarity and durability are concerned, I think
the Elites are just as good as the comparable Leupolds.
FWIW, Terry Wieland (also a Canadian),one of the contributing writers to
Peterson's Rifle Shooter, uses the Elite scopes and he swears by them.
Paul
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have recently bought several Baush and Lomb Elites. I looked at the
Leopolds which were only $50+ more. I went with the B&L because they
cost less. But if I had more $ I would buy the Leopolds they are brighter
and made here in the US. Next time it will be Leopold
Chris
peace
e¿ez