Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Remington 1100 - Barrel damage

80 views
Skip to first unread message

Clayton Brockett

unread,
Aug 24, 1999, 3:00:00 AM8/24/99
to
Okay I know there was alot of talk awhile back about a lawsuit against
Remington for gun problems. I think it had something to do with
steelshot and the shotguns having barrel damage. Well let me tell you a
story from this weekend that happened to moi.

I take my Rem 1100 out to pattern steel shot. Well I put 2 Remington 2
3/4in #2s through the gun, then 3 #3 Fiocchi's, guess what happens after
2nd #2, the barrel splits at the muzzle.

Spoke to Remington head office today and told my story to the lad in
Products and Services, well seing that I have a American address in
Hogansburg NY he told me to send the barrel along with $50 for
replacement barrel. Once I told him my story, the gun is a 2 3/4 with
modified choke, he said that should not have ever happened with factory
loads.

My question is should I be going after a barrel at no cost, the service
rep said because it was an older gun that he didn't think the barrel
warranty was good.

Clayton

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:
http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/

Randy Wakeman

unread,
Aug 25, 1999, 3:00:00 AM8/25/99
to
>My question is should I be going after a barrel at no cost, the service
>rep said because it was an older gun that he didn't think the barrel
>warranty was good.
>
>Clayton

"Generally" speaking, unless a shotgun barrel is screw-choked or specifically
said to be "steel shot compatible," you shoot steel at your own risk.

Also, older "modified" chokes can have MUCH more constriction than current
offerings. Some folks think that firearms last forever- but they don't. The
same perception would not apply to PC's, VCR's, or an automobile.

You are lucky that nobody was hurt, and (though you do not mention the year of
mfg.) it is foolish to shoot anything other than bismuth or tungsten polymer
loads through a gun unless you absolutely know for a fact that steel is okay
BEFORE you shoot.


Randy Wakeman

sam guy

unread,
Aug 25, 1999, 3:00:00 AM8/25/99
to
>
> My question is should I be going after a barrel at no cost, the service
> rep said because it was an older gun that he didn't think the barrel
> warranty was good.
>
> Clayton

Clayton,
Nothing in life is forever. If your engine blows after 75K miles, you
don't expect Chevy to buy you a new one. Pay the lousey $50 and get a new
barrel.

Sam in Gainesville Fl

Jay Roehl

unread,
Aug 25, 1999, 3:00:00 AM8/25/99
to
On Tue, 24 Aug 1999 12:32:08 -0500, Clayton Brockett
<broc...@nrcan.gc.ca> wrote:

>Okay I know there was alot of talk awhile back about a lawsuit against
>Remington for gun problems. I think it had something to do with
>steelshot and the shotguns having barrel damage. Well let me tell you a
>story from this weekend that happened to moi.
>
>I take my Rem 1100 out to pattern steel shot. Well I put 2 Remington 2
>3/4in #2s through the gun, then 3 #3 Fiocchi's, guess what happens after
>2nd #2, the barrel splits at the muzzle.
>
>Spoke to Remington head office today and told my story to the lad in
>Products and Services, well seing that I have a American address in
>Hogansburg NY he told me to send the barrel along with $50 for
>replacement barrel. Once I told him my story, the gun is a 2 3/4 with
>modified choke, he said that should not have ever happened with factory
>loads.
>

>My question is should I be going after a barrel at no cost, the service
>rep said because it was an older gun that he didn't think the barrel
>warranty was good.
>
>Clayton
>

>-------------------------------------------------------------------------

The lawsuit you are referring to was about the particular grade of
steel Remington used in their 12 gauge barrels ONLY. It had nothing to
do with steel shot.
My advice would be to take their offer, as a new barrel costs around
$175 or so. You could try to get them to give it to you, but it might
take an attorney to do that and that would cost you even more, unless
you are one or related to one.
You could sue Remington on this IF you or anyone around you were
injured. Part of the settlement stated that personal injury claims
could be filed whether you participated in the class action settlement
or not.

FWIW

twi...@att.net

unread,
Aug 27, 1999, 3:00:00 AM8/27/99
to
In article <37C17CCF...@nrcan.gc.ca>,

broc...@nrcan.gc.ca wrote:
> Okay I know there was alot of talk awhile back about a lawsuit against
> Remington for gun problems. I think it had something to do with
> steelshot and the shotguns having barrel damage. Well let me tell
you a
> story from this weekend that happened to moi.
>
> I take my Rem 1100 out to pattern steel shot. Well I put 2 Remington 2
> 3/4in #2s through the gun, then 3 #3 Fiocchi's, guess what happens
after
> 2nd #2, the barrel splits at the muzzle.
>
> Spoke to Remington head office today and told my story to the lad in
> Products and Services, well seing that I have a American address in
> Hogansburg NY he told me to send the barrel along with $50 for
> replacement barrel. Once I told him my story, the gun is a 2 3/4 with
> modified choke, he said that should not have ever happened with
factory
> loads.
>
> My question is should I be going after a barrel at no cost, the
service
> rep said because it was an older gun that he didn't think the barrel
> warranty was good.
>
> Clayton

Clayton,
Just be glad your not injured. We dont want another sportsman to end
up as a statistic.

Gary
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------


----
> Visit the rec.hunting and rec.hunting.dogs FAQ Home Page at:
> http://sportsmansweb.com/hunting/
>


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

Dlsheffie

unread,
Aug 30, 1999, 3:00:00 AM8/30/99
to
if the warrenty is for life, they should not charge you for the barrel
0 new messages