Nathan Jr.
> I am looking at purchasing a new lab puppy. The litter turned 6 weeks on
> Thursday. They have not had their dew claws removed yet. Is it too late to
> do so?
No, but more expensive, the longer you wait.
> I've heard that they can snag on something and tear loose, causing
> great pain and possible infection to the dog. Can I still have it done?
see above
> Is
> this an indication that the pups have NOT been cared for correctly?
No.
> They
> have also NOT have any shots yet. The owner said that they waited to do the
> 8 week combination shots. What do you think?
not particularly good. we start shots at 4 weeks and they get a shot every two
weeks after that, no matter what.
>
>
> Nathan Jr.
--
(c)2003, Stu West
Stu & Dawn West
Alma Bottom Pointing Labradors
The FIRST PL Kennel
"Letting Labs Point The Way"
N4758 350th Street
Elmwood, WI 54740
(715) 639-3900 off
(715) 684-9892 cell
Not having the dew claws removed is not necessarily a cause for concern.
*I* do it on my pups, but mostly because it's something that buyers
sometimes want. We have it done at 1 or 2 days old and our vet does the
entire litter at no extra cost (we have her check them all at that age
anyway).
Not having the shots at 4 weeks *IS* a cause for concern - enough that
it alone would be reason enough for me to eliminate them as a breeder I
would consider. Are the sire & dam OFA certified? Are they CERF
certified? Will the pups have their eyes checked by a veternary
optomologist at 8 weeks? And I haven't even begun asking about the
pedigree....
--
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Chris Barnes AOL IM: CNBarnes
ch...@txbarnes.com Yahoo IM: chrisnbarnes
3505 Hillcrest Cr. ph: 979-846-3273
Bryan, TX 77802-3313
I wanted them removing because he is constantly running through brambles, &
I didn't want him to snag them.
It's never too late, but the sooner the better if the dog is likely to tear
them off in-the-field.
A lot of people don't get the jabs done until 8 week old, I didn't with my
litter.
It also saves paperwork of the dogs being re-registered at a different vet.
--
--
Andy (UK_Rabbiter)
Halifax, West Yorkshire
http://uk.geocities.com/uk_rabbiter
www.beattie1969.freeserve.co.uk
http://clik.to/decorator
updated 10 February 2003
"Rabbit Hunters" Creator, Manager & Moderator
http://www.smartgroups.com/groups/Rabbit
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RabbitHunters
---
Outgoing mail from my PC is certified Virus Free!
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27-01-03
Dogs don't have to have the front dewclaws removed. That fad was started by
people who show dogs and took them off so the front leg would look smoother.
The majority of dogs who have them live long and happy lives and never have a
problem. You just need to remember to clip them because the nails are not worn
down like the ones on the feet.
Sometimes a dog will have a dewclaw that sticks out way more than normal and in
that case, sometimes it can get snagged and torn but those dogs are in the
small minority.
Dogs do use their dewclaws to help hold items between their paws.
Many breeders feel that the dewclaw should be left on.
>I am looking at purchasing a new lab puppy. The litter turned 6 weeks on
>Thursday. They have not had their dew claws removed yet. Is it too late to
>do so?
from your e-mail I'm assuming that you are in the US so this might not
apply to you bet here goes anyway!
In UK docking can only legally be done in pups under 48hrs old, dewing
is done at the same time in e.g. spaniels
> I've heard that they can snag on something and tear loose, causing
>great pain and possible infection to the dog.
here in UK we NEVER dew labs, dews are part of breed standard.
spaniels are routinely docked and dewed in working dogs (I have one of
each). FWIW my labs have never had any problems with dews, IIWY I'd
leave them alone
> Can I still have it done?
yes, but whereas at less than 48hrs the bones have not developed and
it can be done with a sharp pair of scissors, without anaethsetic, at
that age it would need a general - expensive! I wouldn't bother.
> Is
>this an indication that the pups have NOT been cared for correctly?
no
> They
>have also NOT have any shots yet. The owner said that they waited to do the
>8 week combination shots. What do you think?
I think that at six weeks the pup has not a sufficiently-developed
immune system for the vaccine to work. Here in the UK we vaccinate at
8 and 12 weeks. New owner is responsible not breeder. May be different
stateside. Either way, nothing to worry about!
hth
--
Derek Turner
Outlook Express is worth precisely what you paid for it.
Corrie