Birthday reminder
Ivan Awfulitch
This week we celebrate a special birthday!
Monica Lewinsky turns 34. Can you believe it? It seems like only yesterday
she was crawling around the White House floor on her hands and knees,
putting everything in her mouth.
They grow up so fast, don't they?
Jorge W. Arbusto, Presidentchul Candydate
> a blow job from a young lady?
>
> I guess a lot of Republicans are closet gays.
Far more importantly for the electorate, many of them are thieves....
GOP Destroyer
"Ivan Awfulitch" <iv...@crummyisp.net> wrote in message
news:fpt2h...@news4.newsguy.com...
More recently your co-horts Mark Foley and restroom Romeo, Larry Craig were
on their hands and knees getting wanked from behind by Bill O'Reilly and
Rush Dildoballs.
bval...@aol.com
> I never understood the hate of that scenario.>
Of course you wouldn't. You're an immature child.
.
> Who WOULDN'T want to get
> a blow job from a young lady?
When you approach adulthood, you'll understand why it's not a good
idea to nail a neurotic 20 year old.
.
> I guess a lot of Republicans are closet gays.
Maturity is a sign of homosexuality?
Jorge W. Arbusto, Presidentchul Candydate
> .
>>> BIRTHDAY REMINDER
>>> This week we celebrate a special birthday!
>>> Monica Lewinsky turns 34. Can you believe it? It seems like only
>>> yesterday she was crawling around the White House floor on her
>>> hands and knees, putting everything in her mouth.
>>> They grow up so fast, don't they?
> .
>> I never understood the hate of that scenario.>
> .
> Of course you wouldn't. You're an immature child.
> .
>> Who WOULDN'T want to get
>> a blow job from a young lady?
> .
> When you approach adulthood, you'll understand why it's not a good
> idea to nail a neurotic 20 year old.
> .
your intense study of Psychology Today magazine?
Moanica was behaving just like many young women today. You got any of them
where you work? Maybe you oughtta strike up a conversation. Young ladies
today are more than happy to broadcast the details of their sex lives to
anyone within earshot. You can thank the women's lib movement for that.
bval...@aol.com
Jorge W. Arbusto, Presidentchul Candydate wrote:
> bval...@aol.com wrote:
> > .
> >>> BIRTHDAY REMINDER
> >>> This week we celebrate a special birthday!
> >>> Monica Lewinsky turns 34. Can you believe it? It seems like only
> >>> yesterday she was crawling around the White House floor on her
> >>> hands and knees, putting everything in her mouth.
> >>> They grow up so fast, don't they?
.
> >> I never understood the hate of that scenario.>
.
> > Of course you wouldn't. You're an immature child.
.
> >> Who WOULDN'T want to get
> >> a blow job from a young lady?
.
> > When you approach adulthood, you'll understand why it's not a good
> > idea to nail a neurotic 20 year old.
.
> Who said she was neurotic, ValleyGirl? Did you make that diagnosis from
> your intense study of Psychology Today magazine?
.
I'm being kind calling her a neurotic.
.
> Moanica was behaving just like many young women today.>
.
And we can thank Bill Clinton to a large degree for helping turn the
next generation of women into sluts.
.
> You got any of them
> where you work? Maybe you oughtta strike up a conversation. Young ladies
> today are more than happy to broadcast the details of their sex lives to
> anyone within earshot. You can thank the women's lib movement for that.
.
Yeah, thank woman's lib for the broken marrages, rampent STDs,
children being raised in a single parent houshold, lachkey kids.
Graci, woman's lib. Graci, graci, graci.
Greg Evans
> And we can thank Bill Clinton to a large degree for helping
> turn the next generation of women into sluts.
You must fear him greatly, to grant him the ability to single-handedly alter
the fundamental sociological and psychological history of Western culture
like that! What a stud he must be, eh?
Greg
and even if it were true, I WOULD thank him
peachy ashie passion
> bval...@aol.com wrote:
>
>
>>And we can thank Bill Clinton to a large degree for helping
>>turn the next generation of women into sluts.
>
>
> You must fear him greatly, to grant him the ability to single-handedly alter
> the fundamental sociological and psychological history of Western culture
> like that! What a stud he must be, eh?
The most powerful man in the world, donchaknow.
bval...@aol.com
> > And we can thank Bill Clinton to a large degree for helping
> > turn the next generation of women into sluts.
.
> You must fear him greatly, to grant him the ability to single-handedly alter
> the fundamental sociological and psychological history of Western culture
> like that!>
Clinton was President of the United States. Of course he could, and
did, single-handedly alter Western civilization.
What a shame that he didn't do it for the better.
What Bill Clinton taught the youth of that generation was that it's
perfectly all right to do whatever one feels like, if that person is
rich, powerful and charming. Grab the breast of a woman who's husband
died an hour earlier? No problem, Gloria Steinem will write an
editorial defending you to the New York Times. A solid citizen steps
forward and says that Clinton raped and beat her? Hey, the bitch
probably loved it.
.
What a stud he must be, eh?
.
No, he's a monster.
And here comes the fun part. The Clintons are at their final days.
Hillary will have to have her teeth kicked in before she steps down in
her bid for President, and before she's done, she'll tear the Democrat
party in two. Remember how much fun the lefties had when Bill Clinton
fought to destroy the career and life of Ken Starr? What a riot it
was when it was Starr who was called the pervert?
Well, the Clintons are about to do to Obama what they did to
Republicans.
Greg Evans
I'm damn near ready to give him a BJ myself, after that glowing endorsement.
Surely such a wondrous thing must heal all my ills, make me rich & famous,
and put me solidly on the path to Total Consciousness!
Greg Evans
> Clinton was President of the United States. Of course he
> could, and did, single-handedly alter Western civilization.
> What a shame that he didn't do it for the better.
Well, at least he's in good company - neither have most of the other US
presidents.
> Well, the Clintons are about to do to Obama what they did to
> Republicans.
Whine ineffectually about his evil, self-serving agenda?
bval...@aol.com
> > Clinton was President of the United States. Of course he
> > could, and did, single-handedly alter Western civilization.
> > What a shame that he didn't do it for the better.
.
> Well, at least he's in good company - neither have most of the other US
> presidents.
What a surprise - a leftie who holds the greatest country in world
history in utter contempt.
Greg Evans
> What a surprise - a leftie who holds the greatest country in
> world history in utter contempt.
What a surprise - a Usenet windbag who's proud of his loudmouthed utter
ignorance.
Do you assume I'm a "leftie" because I've poked fun at the spittle flecked,
uninformed invective that passes for political discourse in an insignificant
and irrelevant newsgroup? Or is it that you consider "righties" to be too
thin skinned and self important to be able to recognize humor when they see
it?
MosNot
"Greg Evans" <gregeva...@charterBLATHER.net> wrote in message
news:62hhcaF...@mid.individual.net...
Damn, it troll season again ?
bval...@aol.com
> > What a surprise - a leftie who holds the greatest country in
> > world history in utter contempt.
.
> What a surprise - a Usenet windbag who's proud of his loudmouthed utter
> ignorance.
.
> Do you assume I'm a "leftie" because I've poked fun at the spittle flecked,
> uninformed invective that passes for political discourse in an insignificant
> and irrelevant newsgroup?
No, I consider you to be a leftie because when I pointed out Clinton's
failure as a moral lead, you wrote "well, at least he's in good
company - neither have most of the other US presidents. "
Any other softballs that you'd like me to knock out of the park?
SummersFrenzy
Oooooh, sweetie. Didja really wanna put your nuts on the table like that?
Maybe you need to go home and think about that.
Greg Evans
> No, I consider you to be a leftie because when I pointed out
> Clinton's failure as a moral lead, you wrote "well, at least
> he's in good company - neither have most of the other US
> presidents. "
No, you consider me a leftie because you have absolutely no logic skills
whatsoever.
> Any other softballs that you'd like me to knock out of the
> park?
Just the one on top of your shoulders.
bval...@aol.com
> > Any other softballs that you'd like me to knock out of the park?
> Oooooh, sweetie. Didja really wanna put your nuts on the table like that?
> Maybe you need to go home and think about that.
I can't help but notice that, for all your childish threats, you
didn't really lob the softball, did you?
bval...@aol.com
wrote:
> bvall...@aol.com wrote:
> > No, I consider you to be a leftie because when I pointed out
> > Clinton's failure as a moral lead, you wrote "well, at least
> > he's in good company - neither have most of the other US
> > presidents. "
> No, you consider me a leftie because you have absolutely no logic skills
> whatsoever.
And yet, oh Logic King, the only answer you were able to muster was an
ad hominem attack, and a fairly piss poor ad hominem attack at that.
Now what would Mr. Spock say of that?
.
> > Any other softballs that you'd like me to knock out of the
> > park?
> Just the one on top of your shoulders.
Violence is the first response of the ignorant.
MosNot
"Greg Evans" <gregeva...@charterBLATHER.net> wrote in message
+---------------------------+
| PLEASE DO NOT FEED |
| THE TROLL. |
| THANK YOU. |
| -- The Management |
+---------------------------+
| |
| | O
o | | |
__\|/___=\| |/=_\|/____
MosNot
"PureRage" <.@.ocm> wrote in message
news:vnc8s3hi9f8g4qg6a...@1ab.org...
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:32:50 -0700, "MosNot" <StillNot@YourHouse>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>+---------------------------+
>> | PLEASE DO NOT FEED |
>> | THE TROLL. |
>> | THANK YOU. |
>> | -- The Management |
>> +---------------------------+
>> | |
>> | | O
>> o | | |
>>__\|/___=\| |/=_\|/____
>
>
> nothing but post it hundreds of times.
> Mainly, you don't like what someone said therefore that makes em a
> troll..
>
> PLONK!
Sometimes, it's just too easy to feed 'em.....
One comment on trolls in ages and I get "plonked"...
yup, that's a troll defense because they know they
lost already. Thanks for playing.
SummersFrenzy
A) there was no threat, merely reaction to your question
B) if you really think I'm touching your balls, you have no brain
C) go home, *little* boy
Larry Krzewinski
Looks like what we have here, Summer, is a wannabe troll who thinks
he's a home run king even though he undoubtedly strikes out when
playing T-ball.
Greg Evans
> Looks like what we have here, Summer, is a wannabe troll who
> thinks he's a home run king even though he undoubtedly strikes
> out when playing T-ball.
Any forum dedicated to that duplicitous windbag Limbaugh *is* pretty much
bush-league...
Greg Evans
> And yet, oh Logic King, the only answer you were able to
> muster was an ad hominem attack, and a fairly piss poor
> ad hominem attack at that.
It sure beat the hell out of the dullsville anti-women's-lib ad hominem
attack you started out with.
> Now what would Mr. Spock say of that?
He'd probably tell you "It is illogical for you to have ignored the
crosspost list."
> Violence is the first response of the ignorant.
As your initial violently misogynistic words clearly demonstrated.
SummersFrenzy
Cute - but you neglected to *add* alt.humor.puns . . . slacker!!
Greg Evans
>> Any forum dedicated to that duplicitous windbag Limbaugh
>> *is* pretty much bush-league...
>
> Cute - but you neglected to *add* alt.humor.puns . . .
> slacker!!
I figured it would sail right over their bobble-heads.
bval...@aol.com
> >> > Any other softballs that you'd like me to knock out of the park?
.
> >> Oooooh, sweetie. Didja really wanna put your nuts on the table
> >> like that? Maybe you need to go home and think about that.
.
> > I can't help but notice that, for all your childish threats, you
> > didn't really lob the softball, did you?
> A) there was no threat, merely reaction to your question
I nerver said that it was a convincing threat, or one that made any
sense. But make no mistake, it was a threat.
.
> B) if you really think I'm touching your balls, you have no brain.
.
When did the lefties decide that proclaiming "you have no brain"
became the ulitimate trump card?
.
> C) go home, *little* boy
Ah, the other leftie trump card - implying that the person winning the
argument has a small penis.
bval...@aol.com
> Looks like what we have here, Summer, is a wannabe troll who thinks
> he's a home run king even though he undoubtedly strikes out when
> playing T-ball.
Tell me, do you lefties ever worry about dislocating your shoulders by
patting yourselves on the back so hard?
bval...@aol.com
> > And yet, oh Logic King, the only answer you were able to
> > muster was an ad hominem attack, and a fairly piss poor
> > ad hominem attack at that.
.
> It sure beat the hell out of the dullsville anti-women's-lib ad hominem
> attack you started out with.
"Dullsville anti-women's lib?" What is this? A 1968 ABC made for TV
movie starring Shelley Fabares and Bill Bixby wearing a nehru jacket?
And a quick re-reading of what I wrote shows that I'm the one AGAINST
women getting bitch-slapped. YOU are the one who choses to turn a
blind eye when it comes to violence against women, when done by a
powerful democrat.
.
> > Now what would Mr. Spock say of that?
.
> He'd probably tell you "It is illogical for you to have ignored the
> crosspost list."
.
What the Hell does crossposting have to do with anything?
.
> > Violence is the first response of the ignorant.
.
> As your initial violently misogynistic words clearly demonstrated.
.
And a quick re-reading of what I wrote shows that I'm the one AGAINST
women getting bitch-slapped. YOU are the one who choses to turn a
blind eye when it comes to violence against women, when done by a
powerful democrat.
.
Larry Krzewinski
Calling anyone "Bush-league" is a terrible insult, but they definitely
deserve it.
Larry Krzewinski
No more so than you windbags do. Now tell us what a terrific job you
conservatives have done in the past eight years.
His answer oughta be good for a laugh, guys.
Larry Krzewinski
>> C) go home, *little* boy
>.
>Ah, the other leftie trump card - implying that the person winning the
>argument has a small penis.
Implying?
Larry Krzewinski
>> As your initial violently misogynistic words clearly demonstrated.
>.
>And a quick re-reading of what I wrote shows that I'm the one AGAINST
>women getting bitch-slapped. YOU are the one who choses to turn a
>blind eye when it comes to violence against women, when done by a
>powerful democrat.
Methinks thou doth protest too much.
bval...@aol.com
wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:03:23 -0800 (PST), "bvall...@aol.com"
>
> <bvall...@aol.com> wrote:
> >> C) go home, *little* boy
> >.
> >Ah, the other leftie trump card - implying that the person winning the
> >argument has a small penis.
> Implying?
.
Yeah, it's awkward, but lefties love to slander people by strong
implication. When they're called on their attacks, they feign outrage
and demand to be shown exactly where the made the accusing statement.
It's tiresome, and by saying "strongly implied", I take away one of
their favorite toys.
bval...@aol.com
> >> As your initial violently misogynistic words clearly demonstrated.
.
> >And a quick re-reading of what I wrote shows that I'm the one AGAINST
> >women getting bitch-slapped. YOU are the one who choses to turn a
> >blind eye when it comes to violence against women, when done by a
> >powerful democrat.
.
> Methinks thou doth protest too much.
Methinks thou art a lying sack of shit.
Larry Krzewinski
>> >> C) go home, *little* boy
>> >.
>> >Ah, the other leftie trump card - implying that the person winning the
>> >argument has a small penis.
>.
>> Implying?
>.
>Yeah, it's awkward, but lefties love to slander people by strong
>implication. When they're called on their attacks, they feign outrage
>and demand to be shown exactly where the made the accusing statement.
>
>It's tiresome, and by saying "strongly implied", I take away one of
>their favorite toys.
But I don't think she was implying at all. Now try not to pee on your
shoe too often.
Larry Krzewinski
Temper, temper.
bval...@aol.com
wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:15:04 -0800 (PST), "bvall...@aol.com"
>
> <bvall...@aol.com> wrote:
> >> >> C) go home, *little* boy
> >> >.
> >> >Ah, the other leftie trump card - implying that the person winning the
> >> >argument has a small penis.
> >.
> >> Implying?
> >.
> >Yeah, it's awkward, but lefties love to slander people by strong
> >implication. When they're called on their attacks, they feign outrage
> >and demand to be shown exactly where the made the accusing statement.
>
> >It's tiresome, and by saying "strongly implied", I take away one of
> >their favorite toys.
.
> But I don't think she was implying at all.
What a surprise. A lefty denying the obvious truth.
bval...@aol.com
wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:15:53 -0800 (PST), "bvall...@aol.com"
>
> <bvall...@aol.com> wrote:
> >> >> As your initial violently misogynistic words clearly demonstrated.
> >.
> >> >And a quick re-reading of what I wrote shows that I'm the one AGAINST
> >> >women getting bitch-slapped. YOU are the one who choses to turn a
> >> >blind eye when it comes to violence against women, when done by a
> >> >powerful democrat.
> >.
> >> Methinks thou doth protest too much.
.
> >Methinks thou art a lying sack of shit.
> Temper, temper.
.
Methinks thou art a condesending ass. And a lying sack of shit.
Greg Evans
> When did the lefties decide that proclaiming "you have no
> brain" became the ulitimate trump card?
Ever since it's been true.
Greg Evans
> What is this? A 1968 ABC made
> for TV movie starring Shelley Fabares and Bill Bixby wearing a
> nehru jacket?
No. Do try to keep up.
> And a quick re-reading of what I wrote shows that I'm the one
> AGAINST women getting bitch-slapped.
And a re-reading that actually uses some *thought* shows that you're the one
getting bitch-slappled.
> What the Hell does crossposting have to do with anything?
The fact that I'm funny, and you're not...not intentionally, anyway.
> And a quick re-reading of what I wrote shows that
...that you keep repeating meaningless phrases, hoping that sheer repetition
will disguise the truth that you've got nothing intelligent or amusing to
say.
Greg Evans
> Methinks thou art a condesending ass. And a lying sack
> of shit.
Special Guest SRPOTW.
MosNot
"Greg Evans" <gregeva...@charterBLATHER.net> wrote in message
Don't ya love it when the ones that accuse
others of being a troll prove themselves to be one ?
bVallely@IdiotsOnLine proved it nicely.
bval...@aol.com
> > When did the lefties decide that proclaiming "you have no
> > brain" became the ulitimate trump card?
> Ever since it's been true.
That's the little fairy tale lefties tell themselves over and over and
over - that intelligence is a trait which can only lead to leftism.
It leads to intellectual bankruptcy.
bval...@aol.com
> > What is this? A 1968 ABC made
> > for TV movie starring Shelley Fabares and Bill Bixby wearing a
> > nehru jacket?
> No. Do try to keep up.
.
Wow, was that statement ever worthless.
.
> > And a quick re-reading of what I wrote shows that I'm the one
> > AGAINST women getting bitch-slapped.
.
> And a re-reading that actually uses some *thought* shows that you're the one
> getting bitch-slappled.
.
Nope, you had to cut the bulk of my arguments to find a few sentences
you felt comfortable responding to - and even then, you've done a
pisspoor job.
.
> > What the Hell does crossposting have to do with anything?
.
> The fact that I'm funny, and you're not...not intentionally, anyway.
.
OH, is THAT what you think you're doing? You actually believe that
you're clever? OK, the gibberish you've written now makes a bit of
sense. It goes without saying that you couldn't get a laugh in a
monkey comedy club with a barrel of cocaine laced bananas, but I see
what you're going for.
Free comedy lesson, Greggie - actually funny people don't announce
that they're funny. They actually DO funny things.
> > And a quick re-reading of what I wrote shows that
.
> ...that you keep repeating meaningless phrases, hoping that sheer repetition
> will disguise the truth that you've got nothing intelligent or amusing to
> say.
.
No, I repeat phrases when cowards, like yourself, run from the
message.
bval...@aol.com
> bvall...@aol.com wrote:
> > Methinks thou art a condescending ass. And a lying sack
> > of shit.
.
> Special Guest SRPOTW.
.
Is this your attempt at wit that was spoken so highly of? Of course,
the person speaking highly of your wit was yourself, but still...
bval...@aol.com
> >> Methinks thou art a condescending ass. And a lying sack
> >> of shit.
.
> > Special Guest SRPOTW.
.
> others of being a troll prove themselves to be one ?
> bVallely@IdiotsOnLine proved it nicely.
Excuse me, when did I accuse anyone of being a troll? And I notice
that you attempted to make a little joke with Bvallely@idiotsOnLIne.
Isn't that cute? I'll bet you were giggling to yourself all day with
that one.
Larry Krzewinski
I thought it was funny. Oh, and I nearly forgot to say that it's
appropriate as well. Enjoy your award.
Larry Krzewinski
By golly, I think bvalley just one himself two in a row! Way to go!!!
Larry Krzewinski
>> ...that you keep repeating meaningless phrases, hoping that sheer repetition
>> will disguise the truth that you've got nothing intelligent or amusing to
>> say.
>.
>No, I repeat phrases when cowards, like yourself, run from the
>message.
Now it seems to me - and I may be wrong here - that a coward wouldn't
have replied to the message at all. But that's just my logic.
Larry Krzewinski
>> >> >> C) go home, *little* boy
>> >> >.
>> >> >Ah, the other leftie trump card - implying that the person winning the
>> >> >argument has a small penis.
>> >.
>> >> Implying?
>> >.
>> >Yeah, it's awkward, but lefties love to slander people by strong
>> >implication. When they're called on their attacks, they feign outrage
>> >and demand to be shown exactly where the made the accusing statement.
>>
>> >It's tiresome, and by saying "strongly implied", I take away one of
>> >their favorite toys.
>.
>> But I don't think she was implying at all.
>.
>What a surprise. A lefty denying the obvious truth.
No way! Note that I never denied that you're a moronic, right-wing,
crackpot.
Larry Krzewinski
Gee, all I thought we were doing was waiting for some sign that
conservatives even have intellect. For the past eight years they sure
haven't shown any. Let us know when you can provide us with a good
example, ok?
George Grapman
"phony soldiers". He first denied that Limbaugh made the comment. Then
he said it was a slip of the tongue. Then he hemmed ans hawed before
telling us that after some checking he determined that liberals
regularly used the term and that it where Limbaugh got it. When asked
for an example of this he departed the thread.
At one time he posted interesting things but that stopped somewhere
between the administration admitting that there were no WMDs and the
2006 election.
bval...@aol.com
> >> > Special Guest SRPOTW.
.
> >> Don't ya love it when the ones that accuse
> >> others of being a troll prove themselves to be one ?
> >> bVallely@IdiotsOnLine proved it nicely.
.
> >Excuse me, when did I accuse anyone of being a troll? And I notice
> >that you attempted to make a little joke with Bvallely@idiotsOnLIne.
> >Isn't that cute? I'll bet you were giggling to yourself all day with
> >that one.
.
> I thought it was funny.>
You were very, very, very wrong.
bval...@aol.com
> >> ...that you keep repeating meaningless phrases, hoping that sheer repetition
> >> will disguise the truth that you've got nothing intelligent or amusing to
> >> say.
.
> >No, I repeat phrases when cowards, like yourself, run from the
> >message.
.
> Now it seems to me - and I may be wrong here - that a coward wouldn't
> have replied to the message at all. But that's just my logic.>
The fact that guys who talk big are cowards is almost a clique.
George Grapman
Greg Evans
>>> When did the lefties decide that proclaiming "you have no
>>> brain" became the ulitimate trump card?
>> Ever since it's been true.
> .
> That's the little fairy tale lefties tell themselves over and
> over and over - that intelligence is a trait which can only
> lead to leftism. It leads to intellectual bankruptcy.
I just meant that it was true about you specifically.
Douglas D. Anderson
Greg Evans
> ... you had to cut the bulk of my arguments to find a few
> sentences you felt comfortable responding to
Because despite your rather belligerent efforts, I'm not interested in
whatever pretend-debate you wish you could draw me into. I know better than
to wrestle with a pig - it gets me dirty, the pig enjoys it, and when all's
said and done your porcine attitude will remain unchanged. It's much more
enjoyable to lean on the fence of the sty and make fun of you - which you
have obligingly, even enthusiastically, allowed me to do. So thanks for
being my dancing pig! It's been fun.
MosNot
"Larry Krzewinski" <Feerles...@madmagazine.com> wrote in message
news:ht9bs3tuorgc9jm52...@4ax.com...
AOL (IdiotsOnLine) is not funny, it's self explanatory.
Larry Krzewinski
Thanks, George. That alone gave me a chuckle.
Larry Krzewinski
Oh no! I have no defense against such a wicked comeback! What shall
I do?
Go away, bvallely. You're a trite, boring ass who has absolutely no
originality or even a sense of humor. It's long past time that I put
you in my killfile.
Larry Krzewinski
<d...@rr.rochester.com> wrote:
>> >> As your initial violently misogynistic words clearly demonstrated.
>> >.
>> >And a quick re-reading of what I wrote shows that I'm the one AGAINST
>> >women getting bitch-slapped. YOU are the one who choses to turn a
>> >blind eye when it comes to violence against women, when done by a
>> >powerful democrat.
>>
>> Methinks thou doth protest too much.
>
>Thou /dost/ ; He,she,it /doth/.
Oops! I guess I dost got it wrong.
Larry Krzewinski
Now that's a very valid point.
MosNot
Oh, don't be so hasty. Most of his
comments are funnier than a lot of jokes.
MosNot
I been laughing at bvallely
since his first comments here.
That NG has its own Mel.....
Greg Evans
>>> Methinks thou doth protest too much.
>> Thou /dost/ ; He,she,it /doth/.
>
> Oops! I guess I dost got it wrong.
Yes, thou didst.
Larry Krzewinski
wrote:
>>> Want to get a good laugh? Do a google groups search for vallely and
>>>"phony soldiers". He first denied that Limbaugh made the comment. Then
>>>he said it was a slip of the tongue. Then he hemmed ans hawed before
>>>telling us that after some checking he determined that liberals
>>>regularly used the term and that it where Limbaugh got it. When asked
>>>for an example of this he departed the thread.
>>> At one time he posted interesting things but that stopped somewhere
>>>between the administration admitting that there were no WMDs and the
>>>2006 election.
>>
>> Thanks, George. That alone gave me a chuckle.
>
>I been laughing at bvallely
>since his first comments here.
>That NG has its own Mel.....
What have you got against Mel?
Larry Krzewinski
wrote:
>>>> >> > Special Guest SRPOTW.
>>>.
>>>> >> Don't ya love it when the ones that accuse
>>>> >> others of being a troll prove themselves to be one ?
>>>> >> bVallely@IdiotsOnLine proved it nicely.
>>>.
>>>> >Excuse me, when did I accuse anyone of being a troll? And I notice
>>>> >that you attempted to make a little joke with Bvallely@idiotsOnLIne.
>>>> >Isn't that cute? I'll bet you were giggling to yourself all day with
>>>> >that one.
>>>.
>>>> I thought it was funny.>
>>>.
>>>You were very, very, very wrong.
>>
>> Oh no! I have no defense against such a wicked comeback! What shall
>> I do?
>>
>> Go away, bvallely. You're a trite, boring ass who has absolutely no
>> originality or even a sense of humor. It's long past time that I put
>> you in my killfile.
>
>Oh, don't be so hasty. Most of his
>comments are funnier than a lot of jokes.
I guess it can wait. I couldn't have put him my killfile anyway since
my plonker's broken.
Larry Krzewinski
Methinks thou dost reply too much.
SummersFrenzy
>
>> >No, I repeat phrases when cowards, like yourself, run from the
>> >message.
> .
>> Now it seems to me - and I may be wrong here - that a coward
>> wouldn't have replied to the message at all. But that's just my logic.
> .
> The fact that guys who talk big are cowards is almost a clique.
<hands bvallely a mirror>
SummersFrenzy
> bval...@aol.com wrote:
>
>>No, I repeat phrases when cowards, like yourself, run from the
>>message.
>
> Now it seems to me - and I may be wrong here - that a coward wouldn't
> have replied to the message at all. But that's just my logic.
using logic Larry? my, oh my - how our world has devolved
Greg Evans
>>>>> Methinks thou doth protest too much.
>>>> Thou /dost/ ; He,she,it /doth/.
>>> Oops! I guess I dost got it wrong.
>> Yes, thou didst.
>
> Methinks thou dost reply too much.
Thou wouldst.
SummersFrenzy
>
>>>>> Methinks thou doth protest too much.
>>>> Thou /dost/ ; He,she,it /doth/.
>>>
>>> Oops! I guess I dost got it wrong.
>>
>>Yes, thou didst.
>
> Methinks thou dost reply too much.
Methinks thou dost think too much
MosNot
"SummersFrenzy" <icediamo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:iNoxj.36832$0I1....@en-nntp-04.dc1.easynews.com...
Pardon, but you forgot a word.
bval...@aol.com
> "Larry Krzewinski" <Feerless_Fr...@madmagazine.com> wrote in message
It just keeps getting better. Internet provider "jokes"? Wow! Wow,
wow, wow, wow. One needs a bathosphere to sink THAT low! Putting
aside the industrial strength geekiness for the moment, you do
understand that a provider named "Idiots On Line" would be "IOL", not
"AOL."
MosNot
Arseholes should serve a purpose......
MosNot
<bval...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:e3e27f3b-2c8b-442e...@v3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
Thanks for proving the point.
bval...@aol.com
On Feb 27, 4:43 pm, Larry Krzewinski <Feerless_Fr...@madmagazine.com>
wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:38:34 -0800 (PST), "bvall...@aol.com"
>
> <bvall...@aol.com> wrote:
> >> >> > Special Guest SRPOTW.
> >.
> >> >> Don't ya love it when the ones that accuse
> >> >> others of being a troll prove themselves to be one ?
> >> >> bVallely@IdiotsOnLine proved it nicely.
> >.
> >> >Excuse me, when did I accuse anyone of being a troll? And I notice
> >> >that you attempted to make a little joke with Bvallely@idiotsOnLIne.
> >> >Isn't that cute? I'll bet you were giggling to yourself all day with
> >> >that one.
.
> >> I thought it was funny.>
.
> >You were very, very, very wrong.
.
> Oh no! I have no defense against such a wicked comeback! >
No, you don't. If you had one, you would have used it.
.
> What shall I do?
.
Write something that is actually funny? Nah, that ship doesn't stop
at your port, does it?
.
> Go away, bvallely. >
.
Let's see if I understand this. You feel that you can insult me for
no particular reason and then order me away. Do you ever wonder why
you don't have any friends?
.
Larry Krzewinski
wrote:
>>>>> Want to get a good laugh? Do a google groups search for vallely and
>>>>>"phony soldiers". He first denied that Limbaugh made the comment. Then
>>>>>he said it was a slip of the tongue. Then he hemmed ans hawed before
>>>>>telling us that after some checking he determined that liberals
>>>>>regularly used the term and that it where Limbaugh got it. When asked
>>>>>for an example of this he departed the thread.
>>>>> At one time he posted interesting things but that stopped somewhere
>>>>>between the administration admitting that there were no WMDs and the
>>>>>2006 election.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, George. That alone gave me a chuckle.
>>>
>>>I been laughing at bvallely
>>>since his first comments here.
>>>That NG has its own Mel.....
>>
>> What have you got against Mel?
>
>Arseholes should serve a purpose......
Touche!
Larry Krzewinski
I dost not, milady! Verily I say to thee, I dost not think too much!
Larry Krzewinski
wrote:
>>>>>>> Methinks thou doth protest too much.
>>>>>> Thou /dost/ ; He,she,it /doth/.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oops! I guess I dost got it wrong.
>>>>
>>>>Yes, thou didst.
>>>
>>> Methinks thou dost reply too much.
>>
>> Methinks thou dost not think too much
>
>Pardon, but you forgot a word.
Thanks, kid. HEY!
Larry Krzewinski
<icediamo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>No, I repeat phrases when cowards, like yourself, run from the
>>>message.
>>
>> Now it seems to me - and I may be wrong here - that a coward wouldn't
>> have replied to the message at all. But that's just my logic.
>
>using logic Larry? my, oh my - how our world has devolved
You don't know how happy I am that you used the word "our".
Greg Evans
> Let's see if I understand this. You feel that you can insult
> me for no particular reason and then order me away.
Yes! He *can* be taught!
> Do you ever wonder why you don't have any friends?
You mean, like all the ones that have stepped forward to defend you?
Larry Krzewinski
<gregeva...@charterBLATHER.net> wrote:
>> Let's see if I understand this. You feel that you can insult
>> me for no particular reason and then order me away.
>
>Yes! He *can* be taught!
You may be giving bvallely too much credit, Greg. I think he's stuck
in the stimulus-response mode.
>> Do you ever wonder why you don't have any friends?
>
>You mean, like all the ones that have stepped forward to defend you?
But the only one who stepped forward for bvallely insulted him instead
. . . Ah! I see your point now.
bval...@aol.com
> > Let's see if I understand this. You feel that you can insult
> > me for no particular reason and then order me away.
.
> Yes! He *can* be taught!
> > Do you ever wonder why you don't have any friends?
> You mean, like all the ones that have stepped forward to defend you?
Those are cyber-allies, not friends. I find it quite telling that you
can't differentiate between the two.
Richard Catto
> > > Any other softballs that you'd like me to knock out of the park?
> > Oooooh, sweetie. Didja really wanna put your nuts on the table like that?
> > Maybe you need to go home and think about that.
> I can't help but notice that, for all your childish threats, you
> didn't really lob the softball, did you?
SummersFrenzy is a Utard.
Richard Catto
> I nerver said that it was a convincing threat, or one that made any
> sense. But make no mistake, it was a threat.
Yeah, that SummersFrenzy is a dangerous Utard.
> > B) if you really think I'm touching your balls, you have no brain.
> When did the lefties decide that proclaiming "you have no brain"
> became the ulitimate trump card?
But it's true isn't it? You have no brain, right?
> > C) go home, *little* boy
> Ah, the other leftie trump card - implying that the person winning the
> argument has a small penis.
I don't think she was talking about your penis. Like the rest of us,
I'm sure she decided that you don't have one.
Richard Catto
> > > And yet, oh Logic King, the only answer you were able to
> > > muster was an ad hominem attack, and a fairly piss poor
> > > ad hominem attack at that.
> > It sure beat the hell out of the dullsville anti-women's-lib ad hominem
> > attack you started out with.
> "Dullsville anti-women's lib?" What is this? A 1968 ABC made for TV
> movie starring Shelley Fabares and Bill Bixby wearing a nehru jacket?
Are you high?
> And a quick re-reading of what I wrote shows that I'm the one AGAINST
> women getting bitch-slapped. YOU are the one who choses to turn a
> blind eye when it comes to violence against women, when done by a
> powerful democrat.
I don't know if Bill Clinton did violence to Monica. I believe she was
tripped up by Linda.
Lewinsky left the US and has made her home in Britain now. She
recently graduated with a MSc.
Richard Catto
> > >> As your initial violently misogynistic words clearly demonstrated.
> > >And a quick re-reading of what I wrote shows that I'm the one AGAINST
> > >women getting bitch-slapped. YOU are the one who choses to turn a
> > >blind eye when it comes to violence against women, when done by a
> > >powerful democrat.
Fuck off, Shakespeare.
Richard Catto
> It goes without saying that you couldn't get a laugh in a
> monkey comedy club with a barrel of cocaine laced bananas
Please kill yerself. That was embarrassing.
> Free comedy lesson, Greggie - actually funny people don't announce
> that they're funny. They actually DO funny things.
oooh. *cringe*
> No, I repeat phrases when cowards, like yourself, run from the
> massage.
Well, you're ugly, smelly and have dirty hands.
Richard Catto
> Do you ever wonder why you don't have any friends?
Larry has friends. Yeah, I hate them too.
Richard Catto
> bval...@aol.com wrote:
> > The fact that guys who talk big are cowards is almost a cliche.
> <hands bvallely a mirror>
can I have an ice-cream cone with sprinkles?
Richard Catto
> > > Let's see if I understand this. You feel that you can insult
> > > me for no particular reason and then order me away.
> can't differentiate between the two.
Real Friends can be bought at your nearest K-Mart for $2.95. They're
on special this week. Normal price is $3.