Larry, you are of course right about your suggestion being a
reasonable possibility, especially in the context of reacting to my
few words of description. And without doubt America had an influx of
highly skilled immigrants from Europe fleeing the chaos there, at
least some of whom were master gunsmiths from Germany. I just got my
hands on a copy of Michael Petrov's book "Custom [American] Gunmakers
of the 20th Century." There I learned last night (among other
tidbits) that Griffin at Griffin and Howe hired several experienced
German and Austrian gunmakers when Howe was hired away by the Hoffman
Gun company in 1923. And, of course, the class of "American custom
rifle" we are talking about very much grew from the wave of mostly
post civil war German immigration that brought with them the Schutzen
tradition of target competition that flourished in the 1880's and
created a market demand beyond the mundane factory Winchester (and the
like).
At the risk of oversimplification, Winchester's mass market was
largely rural farmers and ranchers that viewed a gun of any sort as a
working tool. The custom gun maker's most common client was a city-
dwelling factory worker who road the trolley on Sunday to a range on
the edge of town for target matches - the 1885 "bowling league" of a
German born machinist working in a Cleveland or Milwaukee factory.
These clients viewed their rifle as a key attribute of personal
expression and social life. As might be guessed, many of America's
great gunsmiths from the 1880's on wards were born in Austria or
Germany, spiced by some that left Birmingham (England) or London as
journeymen in the gun trade seeking more opportunity in America.
Anyway, I would wager a large sum that whoever checkered the rifle I
am talking about had previously checkered dozens of rifles even if
this was the only one he completed in America. And the precision and
quality of the inletting work reflects at least supervision from
someone of equivalent experience.
I can add some newly discovered details (and aided by stuff I did not
know last week learned from Petrov's book) that point to the rifle
being a product A. O. Niedner's shop. On the remote possibility that
someone might be interested in an emerging detective story:
My first impression of the rifle from 10 feet away was "that stock is
by Shellhammer." I was reacting to its form and style, a reaction
that was supported when I got close enough to see the workmanship.
For those that do not know, Tom Shellhammer stocked most of the rifles
made by the "Niedner Rifle Company" during its years from 1920 in
Michigan and whose work, with that of Al Linden, Bob Owen, and Seymour
Griffin, define the classic style of the American custom bolt action
rifle. Most of the examples you see of stocks by these old masters
are on 1903 Springfield or Mauser actions. But I am an avid enough
amateur stockmaker to have studied the style of Tom Shellhammer's work
and see its clean form in the Krag. If this stock is not by
Shellhammer, it is certainly by someone that has studied his work.
But the reality is I did not know the maker and was counting on
internal marks to clarify things. A story was not included with the
purchase. That came a few days later.
The reason I made the "Niedner" attribution is that that is who I was
told made the rifle when after purchase I got in touch with the person
who inherited the rifle and sold it to the person who sold it to me.
This person sold the rifle (for a song and I paid the middleman about
$50 more) because they did not know or care anything about rifles. I
was told "Daddy called this his Niedner rifle. He got it (had it
made?) in 1943." When it comes to who might have made a rifle,
"Niedner" is not a name the falls from the clouds, especially if it is
already sold, paid for, and gone. But to my awareness, 1943 seemed a
strange date for a Krag, Niedner would have been nearly 80, and a
vague oral provenance isn't worth the paper it is printed on. But I
could not find any obvious marks on the rifle that confirmed how the
rifle looked to me or what I was told, presumably in good faith.
But things are now more encouraging. Yesterday I took the rifle to my
gunsmith to have a proper repair done to the swivel which also secures
the forearm to the barrel in lieu of a barrel band. Time was
limited. But while the rifle was disassembled so he could scope the
job, I was able to examine part of the stock using his light and
optics on his bench. Low and behold, in proper light and clearly
magnified, what previously looked like an illegible and broken-up
numbers in the pattern of a Social Security number scrawled in faint
pencil on the stock flat where the receiver rests into ??? NIEDNER."
The print appears as if inked by a rubber stamp. After a moment of
euphoria, I had to depart, leaving the rifle with my gunsmith.
When I got home, the Petrov book had arrived in my mailbox!
With book in hand I am now better prepared to study the rifle for
clues and possibly make sense of them. But I won't have the rifle
until my smith gets around to doing the necessary work! On the
outside chance somebody is actually interested, I will update if and
when I know more.
In the meantime, the Petrov book does not show any examples of a Krag
sporter done by Niedner. If anyone is aware of other examples (there
is one pictured on 24 Hr campfire), let me know.