# My experience with M16's/AR15's is limited only to what I've
# read about them, and I just came across a statement about them that
# I've never heard before, so I'm looking for clarification.
#
# In Tom Clancy's nonfiction work "AIRBORNE- A Guided Tour of an
# Airborne Task Force" on page 93, he talks about the M16A2 Rifle:
# "The weapon can be also be quickly adapted for left-handed shooters
# (about 15 percent of troops) by switching the side to which spent
# cartridge cases are ejected. Generally, the M16A2 is an excellent combat
# rifle, and is among the best of its class today."
#
# I've never heard of this. I am aware that the AUG can be converted
# for left hand use, but wouldn't a lefty M16 require an entirely
# different upper assembly?
# ???????
# Charlie
Yeah, Tom's accuracy has declined slightly from his first couple of books.
The M16A2 IS usable by left-handed shooters, but that's because they
integrated a brass deflector into the upper receiver, forward of the forward
assist. This way, brass flys across in front of the shooter's face, instead of
hitting them in the face. With the A1, a detachable adapter was available,
but seemed to be one of the most frequently lost pieces of equipment in
inventory.
James
#
Tom Clancy is full of shit. In his book about the Armored Cav. he stated that
the M-16 is mostly made of sheet metal stampings.
I'd bet he's never had an M-16 in his hands.
Derek
# cartridge cases are ejected.
Yeah, I saw that myself at the bookstore yesterday, and went HUH? I have
never seen nor heard of such a thing. If it exists, it must be something very
new, but as far as I know it is nonsense.
Hi, the M16 has a "brass deflector" attachment which keeps the spent rounds
from going into the left-handed soldier's face.
Alex
Axchully, DPMS (I think) sells a left-handed AR/M-16 upper receiver that
indeed, has the ejection port on the left side. They must sell
left-handed bolts as well (I havn't really looked into it, but a
friend with his arms on backwards bought one recently). So they
do exist. Guess the military decvided that the logistics problems
weren't worth catering to the 10-15% of the grunts they have who would
pro'lly really appreciate these.
Regards,
whit
Charlie
My experience was exactly the opposite - the brass deflector tended to
deflect the brass so that it dropped down the inside of my shirt.
#In <63lht5$i...@xring.cs.umd.edu> clr...@andromeda.rutgers.edu (Charles L. Rowe) writes:
#
#
#
## My experience with M16's/AR15's is limited only to what I've
## read about them, and I just came across a statement about them that
## I've never heard before, so I'm looking for clarification.
##
## In Tom Clancy's nonfiction work "AIRBORNE- A Guided Tour of an
## Airborne Task Force" on page 93, he talks about the M16A2 Rifle:
#
## "The weapon can be also be quickly adapted for left-handed shooters
## (about 15 percent of troops) by switching the side to which spent
## cartridge cases are ejected. Generally, the M16A2 is an excellent combat
## rifle, and is among the best of its class today."
##
## I've never heard of this. I am aware that the AUG can be converted
## for left hand use, but wouldn't a lefty M16 require an entirely
## different upper assembly?
## ???????
## Charlie
#
#Yeah, Tom's accuracy has declined slightly from his first couple of books.
#The M16A2 IS usable by left-handed shooters, but that's because they
#integrated a brass deflector into the upper receiver, forward of the forward
#assist. This way, brass flys across in front of the shooter's face, instead of
#hitting them in the face. With the A1, a detachable adapter was available,
#but seemed to be one of the most frequently lost pieces of equipment in
#inventory.
#
My experience with the brass deflector was that it didn't cause the
brass to move left to right across my face, but to drop straight down
into my arm at the inside of the elbow. Got some burns before I said to
Hell with it, chunked the deflector and either fired right handed or
took my chances getting hit on my helmet with flying brass.
Sam A. Kersh
NRA Life Member
TSRA, JPFO
Charter Member of the Ilk Club.
http://www.flash.net/~csmkersh/csmkersh.htm
No Spam, Please
===============================================================
If you're too busy to hunt, you're too busy.
Note: in off-seasons, substitute "fishing" for "hunting"
Read John Ross' "Unintended Consequences" - available from TSRA @ $33, including tax & shipping.
--
Every gun owner MUST read "Unintended Consequences" by John Ross
Follow this to the amazon.com bookstore and get a copy for around $20.00
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=1888118040/1324-8534431-653301
### My experience with M16's/AR15's is limited only to what I've
### read about them, and I just came across a statement about them that
### I've never heard before, so I'm looking for clarification.
###
### In Tom Clancy's nonfiction work "AIRBORNE- A Guided Tour of an
### Airborne Task Force" on page 93, he talks about the M16A2 Rifle:
##
### "The weapon can be also be quickly adapted for left-handed
shooters
### (about 15 percent of troops) by switching the side to which spent
### cartridge cases are ejected. Generally, the M16A2 is an excellent
combat
### rifle, and is among the best of its class today."
###
### I've never heard of this. I am aware that the AUG can be converted
### for left hand use, but wouldn't a lefty M16 require an entirely
### different upper assembly?
Actually, he states:
Made largely from stamped metal parts and plastic injection
moldings, the M16 is relatively cheap to mass produce.
--Tom Clancy, _Armored_Cav_, P.156 (paperback edition)
This sounds more like a description of the AK-47-type rifles than the
M16. The only parts I can think of off-hand which might be stamped are
the hammer, disconnector, and military auto-sear. Well, there are some
parts in the barrel assembly (like the handguard attachment points) which
might be, but the M16 is actually made largely from parts which are cast,
forged, or machined. All of the major parts (upper and lower receivers,
barrel, and bolt/carrier) are forged/machined, and most of the rest of
the parts are cast/forged/machined. All in all, the M16 is one of the
more *expensive* battle rifles to produce--especially when compared
to the HK G3 (mostly stamped steel), AK-47/AKM/AK-74 (mostly stamped
steel), and so forth.
At any rate, while there may be AR-15/M16 uppers with the ejection port
on the wrong side, I doubt *very* seriously that the US military would
use it, since it would require not only a new upper, but it would also
require a unique bolt. If you didn't switch the bolt, the ejector
would still be trying to fling the brass out the right side of the
receiver--which would present an intriguing problem, given the hole
on the *left* side.
In other words, it would add a layer of complexity which is made
totally unecessary by the integral brass deflector of the M16A2.
Just imagine what sort of havoc it would cause if the armorer
went on a bender, and got the bolts for the lefty and righty M16s
mixed up. Talk about a jam-o-matic! :-)
Then again, stranger things have happened in the military...
James
James P. Callison Microcomputer Coordinator U of Oklahoma Law Center
Call...@hamilton.law.uoknor.edu /\ Call...@hamilton.law.uoknor.edu
DISCLAIMER: I'm not an engineer, but I play one at work...
A-R-DISCLAIMER: Since I ain't OU's legal counsel, these ain't OU's opinions.
I am a lefty and never had a problem with a C-7 (Canadian M-16) in the
three years I carried one in the Canadian Army. This rifle is identical
to an M-16 and is definately NOT able to change the side of case ejection.
--
Peter Cronhelm ZX-7 Carbon Fibre Racing Machine
SBKracer YSR/YZ80 The Little Beast
"I'm not the man you say I am, not radical nor mentally deranged."
-Sons of Freedom-
"No rights were ever given by the grace of god. No rights were ever given
by some United Nations clause. No rights were ever given by some nice guy
at the top. Our rights they were bought by all the blood and all the
tears of all our grandmothers and grandfathers before us."
-New Model Army-
Regards,
Mike