I had a Llama .380 for about 6 years, bought it new
in 1985. A friend also had one that was a number of years
older. The difference in quality was quite noticeable between
the two. The newer guns seem to be of much higher quality,
although there were a very few 'rough' spots, e.g. fairly
poor sights, one grip sideplate cracked after a couple of
years, the overall quality was quite good. The polish
and bluing on the slide was outstanding. When fed Winchester
380 Silvertips (85gr JHP) it functioned 100% perfectly,
I never ever had one of them misfeed, even when new, and they
were pretty accurate to boot. It was picky about handloads,
or anything with a wide open hollowpoint.
The older style Llama .380 had a pivoting link action much
like the Colt 1911, the newer one had a solid post for the
rear of the barrel and was a simple blowback operation (no
recoil operated linkage at all).
Never seen or shot one in .22LR.
Tom Grover
tgr...@flyer.us.dell.com
==
I don't speak for Dell.
I've owned a .22 for over 30 years. Currently, it is very UNreliable. Missfires a lot regardless of ammo type or brand. Needs more force behind the hammer. A pretty little gun to look at though, but not use.
I've personal experience with only two LLAMA pistols. The first was
a .38 Super my dad purchased used. It was surprisingly accurate and
would reliably feed everything including 158 grain lead SWCs, but it
had a disturbing tendency to rip off two or three rounds full auto
unexpectedly. It went bye-bye. The second was a nice older .22
that shot well enough, but approached a 15% misfire rate due to
insufficient firing pin contact. I liked the little mini-1911
pistol well enough to keep it and let a local 'smith recontour the
firing pin, but the misfires never went away completely and I
eventually swapped the small Llama away. Not many years later I came
across an older like-new airweight Llama .22 in the box and wish I
had picked it up.
Steve
Llama's will not stand up to continuous use, are not very accurate and only get worse,
are not well known for their reliability, and just don't measure up.
Good shooting,
Bill
Dick
I've had 3 Llamas, all of them dogs, and all sold without regret. I had
the .22, the .380 (the locked breech model with swinging-link a la
M1911A1) and the big .38 Super. ALL of them needed shop work: the .22
was so soft the hammer and firing pin deformed with extended use and the
gun wouldn't fire; the .380 did the same, and the .38 Super developed an
incurable hammer-rides-the-slide-problem that seemed to require
replacing half the internal parts.
These were all older guns, dating from no later than 1974 or so. YMMV,
but personally the next Llama **I** own, new or not, will be the kind
that eats grass. I wouldn't take a shooting Llama as a gift.
The Elitist
Shoot Safe,
Steve O'Dell
The new generation of Llama .45 is truly excellent buy for the money, especially
for people using it for self defense only. It comes with whistles and bells
that you have to pay gunsmith extra to add on aftermarket if you buy a Colt 1911.