"Rod T. Rogers" <rod...@aol.comnospam> wrote in message
news:20020519101338...@mb-mg.aol.com...
"Rod T. Rogers" <rod...@aol.comnospam> wrote in message
news:20020519101338...@mb-mg.aol.com...
> Hello Fellow Enthusiasts,
> Over the years, I have repotted my 50 or so phals, dens, cats, paphs, and
> oncidiums in my homemade mix consisting of 70% PINE bark, 25% recycled
(wine
> bottle) cork chunks, and 5% charcoal. All plants are thriving and in
excellent
> condition. However, every one of my dozen or more orchid books refer to
"bark"
> or "fir bark" but NEVER pine bark, as an acceptable potting component. I
> realize there are many "old wives tales" regarding various aspects of
> orchid-tending, but this silence on the attributes of pine bark continues
to
> elude me. Is there ANYONE out there able provide a VALID horticultural
> rationale as to why pine bark may be inappropriate and/or unacceptable as
a
> potting amendment?
> Cordially,
> Rod T. Rogers
> L.I., NY, Zone 7
>>
<<Subject: Re: Repotting: Why NOT Use Pine Bark?
From: "Ken Woodward" k...@kwoodward.net
Date: Sun, May 19, 2002 12:20 PM
Message-id: <shQF8.7830$Bn5.3...@typhoon.ne.ipsvc.net>
Pine breaks down too quickly, so it is not considered a good choice. There
are other factors to consider, however, including your watering and
fertilizing habits. If what you are doing works for you, then it is the
correct thing for you.
Ken Woodward
Newton, MA
http://kwoodward.net
Rod T. Rogers
L.I., NY, Zone 7
Diana
Kye.
"Rod T. Rogers" <rod...@aol.comnospam> wrote in message
news:20020519135706...@mb-ck.aol.com...
Here are two hypothesis why others may not have been as succesful:
- Not all pine species may be equals. On my bag the pine species is only
identified as "Southern Pine". It has been packed in North Carolina. I have
no idea what actual species was used.
- Pine bark will degrade more rapidely if the medium is kept wet. I try to
get the medium to dry out at least once a week (it also help with pests
control). Pine bark last for at last 2 - 3 years in this manner. If I have
an orchid species that require to be kept damp at all time I do not use pine
bark.
Does this helps?
Marc
Assuming the validity of the comment, it strikes me as a likely explanation
of why pine bark is considered unsuitable for orchids. FWIW ! :>)
Rod T. Rogers
L.I., NY, Zone 7
<< Subject: Re: Repotting: Why NOT Use Pine Bark?
From: "john beasley" jbea...@nyc.rr.com
Date: Sun, May 19, 2002 3:24 PM
Message-id: <DZSF8.36945$6c7.8...@typhoon.nyc.rr.com>
Rod T. Rogers
L.I., NY, Zone 7
"Rod T. Rogers" <rod...@aol.comnospam> wrote in message
news:20020519182410...@mb-fj.aol.com...
Orchid bark (ie pine bark commercially prepared and package for use with
orchids) is very chunky. A lot of what I've heard and read from Australian
growers states to use the chunky bark in favour of the flaky stuff. Maybe it is
a species difference then. Or maybe the difference in structure is due to where
on the tree the bark is harvested from. Presumably if commercial orchid bark in
the US is fir bark, the chunky pine bark wouldn't be separated from the flaky
bark as it is here (most pine mulches in Oz are on the flaky side).
Andrew
Are you referring to fir bark straight off the tree or the stuff you buy from
packaged from a nursery? When any wood based product decomposes the
bacteria/fungi use up nitrogen taking away nitrogen from any plant trying to
grow in it. This is called nitrogen drawdown. It is recommended that you cover
wood chip mulch with blood'n'bone for this reason.
Here in Australia, pine bark treatment for orchids involves heaping wet pine
bark in layers of bark and a nitrogen source (ie urea/blood'n'bone/etc) for a
few weeks. This is not enough time to decompose the bark but it does reduce the
bark's need to draw in nitrogen. This is also enough time for the pine's toxins
to be reduced. I assumed the same process was used for fir. Ray mentioned that
fir bark is steamed to remove the oils and tars. This process is also used with
pine bark instead of partial composting but composted pine bark is usually
recommended over steamed/boiled bark.
As for the life of pine to fir bark, it appears that for the chunky stuff the
break down rate is comparable.
The outer surface of the pine bark I'm used to seeing is very porous and
flaky, but if you scrape that off, between that and the wood proper is a
layer of firmer stuff that - to my eye, anyway - would be better suited for
a medium -- assuming the oils and tars were gone.
--
Ray Barkalow <> First Rays Orchids
http://www.firstrays.com
Secure Online Ordering & Lots of Free Info!
"Andrew" <Cory...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3CE99DA9...@yahoo.com...
.. and at least in NZ, pine bark is washed and left to age a bit IIRC. The
fine particles are mostly gone. There's certainly some treatment involved and
not just "gather bark - use for orchids" :). Some growers further wash and/or
treat the bark (eg add lime or fertilisers).
Bruce
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Oook !
NOTE remove the not_ from the address to reply. NO SPAM !
However... re: compensating for the effect of nitrogen draw-down without
partial composting, traditional instructional reading simply recommends the
use of a high nitrogen fertilizer, like a 30-10-10, to put it back in. I've
also read at least one account (though I unfortunately can't remember where)
expressing the opinion that this type of compensation isn't really
necessary - that the amount of nitrogen "drawn down" isn't significant
enough to justify these traditional compensatory procedures.
These different accounts of the rate that pine breaks down is confusing.
Isn't it a softer wood than fir and redwood, and so would naturally break
down more quickly? I wonder, then, if nitrogen draw-down is more of an
issue with pine because the process happens faster ? I dunno.
Sorry about all the conjecture. It's sort've what I do when I don't know.
And there's so MUCH to know !
John