Oh and by the way... the graphics are much better too on snes
THIS MESSAGE WAS WRITTEN AS A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO COMPETING SYSTEMS
NO OFFENCE TO GENISIS OWNERS IS INTENDED
>THIS MESSAGE WAS WRITTEN AS A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO COMPETING SYSTEMS
>NO OFFENCE TO GENISIS OWNERS IS INTENDED
EGADS! They're coming out of the woodworks!!! The only offense here,
laddy-buck, is your very existence.
--Chinh Nguyen
Ignoring the blatent advocacy, which belongs on another newsgroup, I can
respond with confidance to this person.
You are wrong. The correct answer is that both the Genesis and the SNES
are so out-of-date, compared to any of the next-gen systems, that any
difference between them is negliable. If anyone reading this really
wants to get a good system, invest in a PSX or Saturn. Either can run
rings around either a Genesis or SNES.
Yes, MK2 is better for the SNES, but that is because the SNES is better
at fighting games, with more colors, and better sound. The Genesis is
better, generally, at sports games. Compare NHLPA '95 for the Genesis
and SNES. The Genesis's surperior processor speed allows it to handle
the many sprites of sports games with less slow-down than the SNES.
Nate Barnes, using his father's account.
: Sega players! no offence but sega is going down the tubes but snes
: is taking over. Lets take... Mortal kombat 2 and compare..
: in genisis, There is no announcer... you know..."Shang Tsung Wins"
: "Flawless Victory" "Rapeality"
: wheras in gen, you get the little chuuu noise when you chose and the Fataliy
: word is not spokken by shao kahn and there are a lot of sound affects
: missing too! i know that genisis lovers like it but if i were you, i
: would invest in a snes.
: Oh and by the way... the graphics are much better too on snes
: THIS MESSAGE WAS WRITTEN AS A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO COMPETING SYSTEMS
: NO OFFENCE TO GENISIS OWNERS IS INTENDED
Proofread Daniel-son, proofread...
-Steve