Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

KI for sega

0 views
Skip to first unread message

David Aldridge

unread,
Mar 5, 1996, 3:00:00 AM3/5/96
to

William Parker (park...@pirates.armstrong.edu) writes:
> okay, i know it sounds like a stretch, but i have heard a stupid rumor
> that KI will be licensed such that a sega version will be made availible.
> i do not have the money to buy an snes, nor do i care to. has anyone else
> heard this rumor, or is my source a complete moron, as i suspect?

Probabky the latter, since KI was under the Nintendo name in the arcades.
Besides, isn't Rare part of Nintendo's "Dream Team", meaning that they
only do Nintendo exclusives?

Nght

unread,
Mar 6, 1996, 3:00:00 AM3/6/96
to
Can you say never gonna happen

Eric French

unread,
Mar 7, 1996, 3:00:00 AM3/7/96
to
Nght (ng...@aol.com) wrote:
: Can you say never gonna happen

Uh, who cares?

-=e=-

=P


jua...@spcvxb.spc.edu

unread,
Mar 11, 1996, 3:00:00 AM3/11/96
to
In article <4hlade$k...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, ng...@aol.com (Nght) writes:
> Can you say never gonna happen

Thank God.

That game sucks and so does KI2. It really is a waste of the U64 technology.

Ned
St. Peter's College

Tim Williams

unread,
Mar 12, 1996, 3:00:00 AM3/12/96
to
In article <Dnrrs...@freenet.carleton.ca>, as...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA says...

>
>
>William Parker (park...@pirates.armstrong.edu) writes:
>> okay, i know it sounds like a stretch, but i have heard a stupid rumor
>> that KI will be licensed such that a sega version will be made availible.
>> i do not have the money to buy an snes, nor do i care to. has anyone else
>> heard this rumor, or is my source a complete moron, as i suspect?

If its gonna be one of those 2d deals like the snes version I suggest
nintindo keep it. BTW was anyone as unimpressed as me of KI2? It seems
to have lost a lot of what the first had going for it.(camera zooming &
multiple
planes).

Tim


Jago

unread,
Mar 12, 1996, 3:00:00 AM3/12/96
to
On 12 Mar 1996, Tim Williams wrote:

> If its gonna be one of those 2d deals like the snes version I suggest
> nintindo keep it. BTW was anyone as unimpressed as me of KI2? It seems
> to have lost a lot of what the first had going for it.(camera zooming &
> multiple
> planes).
>
> Tim

Hey, I wasn't paying attention to the lack of camera zooms until now.
Thanks for pointing that out. It does have some, but not like that in KI1.
If you want to see what I said about this game, check out my review page at
http://otto.cmr.fsu.edu/~king_s/ki2review.html .

{--------------------------------------------------------------------------}
{ Name: Steven C. King Institution: Florida State University }
{ Addr: sck...@garnet.acns.fsu.edu Major field: MM Performance }
{ stev...@freenet.fsu.edu Instrument: Clarinet, piano (hobby) }
{ http://otto.cmr.fsu.edu/~king_s Last words: Typing? What's that? }
{--------------------------------------------------------------------------}


Dr. Blasphemy

unread,
Mar 13, 1996, 3:00:00 AM3/13/96
to
TW> If its gonna be one of those 2d deals like the snes version I suggest
TW> nintindo keep it. BTW was anyone as unimpressed as me of KI2? It seems
TW> to have lost a lot of what the first had going for it.(camera zooming &
TW> multiple
TW> planes).

Yeah, it totally sucks. The messed with a lot of stuff, which was just fine
with the first one. For example, Combo can barely juggle with his Powerline
Punch, we don't get to see the characters go splat during a pit, Sabrewulf and
especially Glacius' combos/hits are cheap, and no blocking while in the air
like in the Capcom fighters.


0 new messages