We all know how powerful the N64 is: REALLY POWERFUL! But what about the
M2? The last confirmed news is that they were planning on incorporating
DVD technology into the later verions of the M2. Well....???? What are
the specs? The M2 was said to be out this Fall, so why isn't there any
news? Last I heard, the M2 is slightly superior to the Nintendo 64 (Which
is entirely based on their target specs, not actual specs). Well, I don't
know about you, but I'm wondering if the M2 is going to live up to those
specs--AND deliver at the price they wanted?
If you want my opinion, I don't think they're going to do it. Sure, they
might get the machine as powerful as they wanted it to be, but at $250-300
bucks? I doubt it. One thing we know is that the Big M is the biggest
and richest consumer electronic company in the world. They're so good,
they can even package up dog shit and make a profit. We all saw how Sony
dominated Sega with their 100 million Playstation release plan. Right
now, they're ahead and staying ahead. Will this same event happen when
the multi Billion dollar Maturishita (how the hell do you spell it?)
delivers the M2? Can Nintendo handle the heat of this new foe? I think
they can. Nintendo basically ownes the entire industry? When people hear
the name "Nintendo," they know it stands for "Quality." I think this Fall
will be very, VERY interesting. If I'm going to bet on a winner, I'd
invest on Nintendo. Even if the M2 ends up running circles around the N64
in terms of computing power, Nintendo wears "BIG SHIT KICKERSS."
Everything we've seen so far are just the preliminaries. This Fall, we're
going to see the Main Event.
-Isaiah Paradise
Don't forget one thing..... a DVD drive costs about $200+ (or even more?? I don't
remember...) Therefore they're DEFINITELY lying about the $250-300 price if
they're really planning on incorporating DVD technology in M2.
Daniel Yang
L8s...
--
________________________________________
Danny Ruiz | Who can you believe?
| It's hard to play it safe
afn3...@afn.org | But apart from a few good friends
or | We don't take anything on faith
d013...@dcfreenet.seflin.lib.fl.us | Until later...-RUSH (Show Don't Tell)
----------------------------------------
Remember the original 3DO specs, if they were true then it would be
far more powerful than the Playstation is now. Nintendo may muddle about
with release dates but they don't mislead much with specs and games.
They said that the N64 will generate at least 100 000 polygons a second
with all the effects on, there are a hell of a lot. Currently Mario 64
has at least 140 000 with all the effects added, the shonoshi one was
only operating at 50% graphics power.
As for coming out this fall they aren't showing it at E3, they
probably can't get it ready by then. They can't even get the upgrade
version to run on certain 3DO models. So any descent release this year
would be almost impossible.
>
>If you want my opinion, I don't think they're going to do it. Sure, they
>might get the machine as powerful as they wanted it to be, but at $250-300
>bucks? I doubt it. One thing we know is that the Big M is the biggest
>and richest consumer electronic company in the world. They're so good,
>they can even package up dog shit and make a profit. We all saw how Sony
>dominated Sega with their 100 million Playstation release plan. Right
>now, they're ahead and staying ahead. Will this same event happen when
>the multi Billion dollar Maturishita (how the hell do you spell it?)
>delivers the M2? Can Nintendo handle the heat of this new foe? I think
>they can. Nintendo basically ownes the entire industry? When people hear
>the name "Nintendo," they know it stands for "Quality." I think this Fall
>will be very, VERY interesting. If I'm going to bet on a winner, I'd
>invest on Nintendo. Even if the M2 ends up running circles around the N64
>in terms of computing power, Nintendo wears "BIG SHIT KICKERSS."
>Everything we've seen so far are just the preliminaries. This Fall, we're
>going to see the Main Event.
>
>-Isaiah Paradise
>
Has anyone seen any actual games running on the M2?
On a side note people have been saying that the early N64 demos (the
ones on Onyxs) can't be done on the N64, I disagree. I've looked at the
early demos and have seen some of the things in screenshots of the
actual game. The Space Shuttle on the launch pad is in part of
Pilotwings 64, looking better than it did. The Passanger plane is
undoughtingly there as well. The underwater bits with sharks and
submarines are in Mario 64's underwater levels.
David
Grtx, Ryu
------------------------------------------------------------
Ryu's homepage: http://www.cuci.nl/~dannyku/index.htm
email: dan...@cuci.nl
>OK,
>We all know how powerful the N64 is: REALLY POWERFUL! But what about the
>M2? The last confirmed news is that they were planning on incorporating
>DVD technology into the later verions of the M2. Well....???? What are
>the specs? The M2 was said to be out this Fall, so why isn't there any
>news? Last I heard, the M2 is slightly superior to the Nintendo 64 (Which
>is entirely based on their target specs, not actual specs). Well, I don't
>know about you, but I'm wondering if the M2 is going to live up to those
>specs--AND deliver at the price they wanted?
>If you want my opinion, I don't think they're going to do it. Sure, they
>might get the machine as powerful as they wanted it to be, but at $250-300
>bucks? I doubt it. One thing we know is that the Big M is the biggest
>and richest consumer electronic company in the world. They're so good,
>they can even package up dog shit and make a profit. We all saw how Sony
>dominated Sega with their 100 million Playstation release plan. Right
>now, they're ahead and staying ahead. Will this same event happen when
>the multi Billion dollar Maturishita (how the hell do you spell it?)
>delivers the M2? Can Nintendo handle the heat of this new foe? I think
>they can. Nintendo basically ownes the entire industry? When people hear
>the name "Nintendo," they know it stands for "Quality." I think this Fall
>will be very, VERY interesting. If I'm going to bet on a winner, I'd
>invest on Nintendo. Even if the M2 ends up running circles around the N64
>in terms of computing power, Nintendo wears "BIG SHIT KICKERSS."
>Everything we've seen so far are just the preliminaries. This Fall, we're
>going to see the Main Event.
>-Isaiah Paradise
I think its unlikely that we will see a head to head collision this
autumn. It wasn't to long ago since Matsushita purchased the M2
technology from 3DO. They may want to wait out Nintendo, so all N64
specs are "on the table", and then pull a similar stunt as Sony made
on Saturn (coming out later but with more launch-titles etc). If they
are going for DVD a natural guess is that they will NOT compete in the
same segment as N64 (kids buying $250 consoles). My guess is that they
would position it for a more mature aduience (at a much higher
price-point as well). Maybe a Home-entertainment console? Primary a
DVD-player for Home-Cinema (AC3-Dolby pro-logic etc), Karakoe,
DVD-surround Music-disc HI-FI player, with built in Video-game
ability. This kind of system are what we may see in the future, as a
lot of the chips/technology is converging, and will also justify a
significantly higher price than a games-only console.
/TJ
Well actually game consoles had implemented CD technology as soon as there
was one, almost at the same time as PC. I don't know if you heard of it or
not, but the precedent of the old Turbo Graphx, the PC Engine had a single
speed CD-ROM add on, and I used to play Street Fighter 1 on it.
-=[SoN GoKoU]=-
>M2 will probably be more powerful, but who cares when you got only
>crap games for it? N64 is bound to have far better games than M2;
>just look at what happened to 3do...
>Grtx, Ryu
Why will N64 have better games than M2???
3DO and M2 are different hardware...Just as Virtual boy and N64 are
different hardware...
How do you know that NAMCOs (or maybe Even SEGAs) games would suck on
the M2 hardware???
We've seen some biassed carp before...and your posting won't probably
be the last....
/TJ
You got a point there Daniel. I'm not sure when they were deciding to incorporate
the DVD technology, but I'm sure they want to wait until the rewriteable versions
come down cheap enough. Personally, I don't see the M2 really making it out by this
christmas. After the the N64 rolls out, there's going to be so much hype, who's
going to look over at M2? Gamers should really ask if they really need the M2 right
now. If I were the designers at 3DO, I would hold off another 3 years until the N64
starts seeing its age. ONLY then would people want to upgrade to the next powerful
system. Who knows, by then they'll have 256-Bit systems that eat a N64 for
breakfast. I think It's pretty safe to say the Nintendo will have their share of the
market.
Happy gaming!
Isaiah Paradise
If that ends up being the case, M2 is dead where it stands.
Already, that idea of the M2 reeks of CD-i or the Internet TV...One a
system that tried to cater to adults, the other an over-priced device
that tries to do everything.
>In article <4lc72q$k...@dfw-ixnews5.ix.netcom.com>,
> Cyb...@ix.netcom.com(Richard T Jordan) wrote:
>>
>>>I think its unlikely that we will see a head to head collision this
>>>autumn. It wasn't to long ago since Matsushita purchased the M2
>>>technology from 3DO. They may want to wait out Nintendo, so all N64
>>>specs are "on the table", and then pull a similar stunt as Sony made
>>>on Saturn (coming out later but with more launch-titles etc). If they
>>>are going for DVD a natural guess is that they will NOT compete in the
>>>same segment as N64 (kids buying $250 consoles). My guess is that they
>>>would position it for a more mature aduience (at a much higher
>>>price-point as well). Maybe a Home-entertainment console? Primary a
>>>DVD-player for Home-Cinema (AC3-Dolby pro-logic etc), Karakoe,
>>>DVD-surround Music-disc HI-FI player, with built in Video-game
>>>ability. This kind of system are what we may see in the future, as a
>>>lot of the chips/technology is converging, and will also justify a
>>>significantly higher price than a games-only console.
>>
>> If that ends up being the case, M2 is dead where it stands.
>>Already, that idea of the M2 reeks of CD-i or the Internet TV...One a
>>system that tried to cater to adults, the other an over-priced device
>>that tries to do everything.
I don't know,
I don't think a machine that can play DVD movies and play video-games
"tries to do everyting".
I know I will buy a DVD-player for my home-cinema and TV-system. I
also know I would like a DVD-based Console...I would definitively be
interested to buy a cool console with a built in DVD-player for films
and surround music disk etc. I don't beleive I am the only one who
would like such a box?
>>
>You're definately right.
(not me..the other poster :-))
>There won't be many 3rd party publishers if the M2 is going to be this
>expensive. Also, 3rd party publishers will be very reluctant to develop
>for M2, since they know what happened to 3DO...
>If you want to play games, buy a console, not a multimedia machine.
I think the M2 will have a strong 3rd-party backing if Matsushita puts
its weight behind it...but only time will tell us wheather yours or
mine speculation will be correct.
I have greats hope for M2 (just as I have great hopes for N64, PSX2
etc etc)...
/YJ
>>dan...@cuci.nl (Danny Kusters) wrote:
>>
>>>M2 will probably be more powerful, but who cares when you got only
>>>crap games for it? N64 is bound to have far better games than M2;
>>>just look at what happened to 3do...
>>>Grtx, Ryu
>>
>>Why will N64 have better games than M2???
>>
>>3DO and M2 are different hardware...Just as Virtual boy and N64 are
>>different hardware...
>>
>>How do you know that NAMCOs (or maybe Even SEGAs) games would suck on
>>the M2 hardware???
>>
>>We've seen some biassed carp before...and your posting won't probably
>>be the last....
>>
>>/TJ
>>
>>
>I've got a 3DO, and the games SUCK.
>Read the magazines and the newsgroups, and you'll
>see the biggest problem of the M2 will be the
>probable lack of 3rd party publishers, just like
>the 3DO.
In my opinion, you can't judge the M2 based on experienses with 3DO.
1) Its a new company making it (and its Big and its Japanese!!)!!
(and marketing it!!)
2) The hardware is VERY different from 3DO.
3) According to every comment I've read the 3rd-parties has been very
impressed and optimistic about the system, and looked with great
optimisim about the techonolgy knbeing used by Matsushita instead
of the original 3DO company.. There have even been
rumors about Sega using the technology etc...So I can't see any
major reason really why this machine couldn't get tremendeous
back-up from 3rd-party deelopers, both in Japan and US.
I think I've said this a couple of times before...but here we go
again...
It's not that easy as you can tell the future by looking at the
past...
/TJ
: system. Who knows, by then they'll have 256-Bit systems that eat a N64 for
You seem to believe in the rule 64 bit = 2 times faster than 32bit.
That is far from the truth. While this was quite true for some 2d
operations (scrolling for example. but which console would scroll
by copying the data anyway ?) it is not true at all for 3d!
When doing texturemapping, the mapper-chip must read "random"
pixels from memory. So the memory read on 32bit path is not
faster than on 8bit path, except for the unlikely case the
next pixel is read within the same 4 pixel block!
while 64bit makes sense on gfx-cards of workstations to display
and move high resolution screens, 64bit is quite useles for
a console (I don't know but I guess not all components of
the N64 will have 64bit paths. maybe only one part).
the qualities like memory acess speed, chip architecture of
special hardware etc. count factors more than bits.
the bits are however good for the commercial ;)
so, 256bit is imho more far away than you might think.
and if it will be used, it will do high speed copy but
not gfx-fx (except 2d fx).
: Isaiah Paradise
------------------------------------------------------------------------
fisc...@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE (Juergen "Rally" Fischer) =:)
-Casey
Matsushita as you well know is called Panasonic here in the
states. This was the same company that produced the original
3DO hardware. I honestly believe that they don't have the
know how to market the machine against such heavy
competition. Even if it's a superior machine, proper
marketing and quality softs are much more important and the
M2 will be lacking in both.
Well Moron, that's a good thing, because Trip is not going to have
anything to do with marketing the M2 since 3DO sold the technology to
Matsushita. If you don't think one of the world's largest electronic
manufacturers won't be able to market the M2 then you are insanely mistaken.
Dan
PS. Everyone is now dumber for having listened to you.
--
///////////////////////////////////////////////////
// R U S H K A P P A S I G M A //
///////////////////////////////////////////////////
>> I think the M2 will have a strong 3rd-party backing if Matsushita puts
>> its weight behind it...but only time will tell us wheather yours or
>> mine speculation will be correct.
>Matsushita as you well know is called Panasonic here in the
>states. This was the same company that produced the original
>3DO hardware.
>I honestly believe that they don't have the
>know how to market the machine against such heavy
>competition
Why not? Because of money, brains, or lack of ability to learn from
former misstakes???
>Even if it's a superior machine, proper
>marketing and quality softs are much more important and the
>M2 will be lacking in both.
You BEILIVE it will fail because the hardware designs were made by a
company who privously didn't succeed as well as needed.
Well I don't see a big connection between 3DO and M2 now when the
technology has been sold...So I think its disregarding the facts to
say it wont have software or marketing...I don't know...and I bet you
can't know it either...
/TJ