Once again, I wrote:
| As usual, for each of the items above, your objective is to give a
| response that (1) is correct, and (2) will be duplicated by as FEW
| other people as possible. Feel free to use any reference material...
Contest MSB73 drew a barely acceptable 23 entrants, and long-time
entrant DAVE FILPUS has not only won for the first time, but done it
by a considerable margin. Moderately hearty congratulations!
In second place was Garmt de Vries-Uiterweerd, and Alan Morgan
came third.
These are their slates of answers (some abbreviated). As always, you
should be reading this in a monospaced font for proper tabular alignment.
DAVE FILPUS GARMT DE VRIES-U. ALAN MORGAN
[0] Paul Martin Kim Campbell Stephen Harper
[1] UNHCR John Bardeen Marie Curie
[2] 67 43 73
[3] HStaST, ST:TAS TWiNE, Bond movie TSNotD, Willis
[4] Rwanda Ethiopia USSR
[5] Venezia Siracusa Roma
[6] Nueva Vizcaya Nueva Vizcaya New Mexico
[7] Fell asleep Cheat in race Fool pursuer
[8] Causeway Ford Ford
[9] Curling Curling Basketball
| Please do not quote the questions back to me, and do send only
| plain text in ASCII or ISO 8859-1: no HTML, attachments, Micros--t
| character sets, etc., and no Unicode, please. (Entrants who fail
| to comply will be publicly chastised in the results posting.)
Dan Tilque, Dan Blum, Adrian Bailey, Erland Sommarskog, and the entrant
using the single name "Calvin" are duly chastised! Don't do that!
Naughty, naughty entrants!
To review the scoring:
| Low score wins; a perfect score is 1.
|
| If your answer on a category is correct, then your score is the number
| of people who gave that answer or an answer I consider equivalent. If
| wrong, or if you skip the question, you get a high score as a penalty.
| The scores on the different questions are *multiplied* to produce a
| final score. ... It is also possible that I may consider one answer
| to be a more specific variant of another: in that case it will be
| scored as if they are different, but the other, less specific variant
| will be scored as if they are the same.
See the questions posting for the penalty score formula.
Here is the complete table of scores.
RANK SCORE ENTRANT Q0 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9
1. 540 Dave Filpus 3 2 2 1 3 1 3 1 1 5
2. 3840 Garmt de Vries-Uiterweerd 4 8 2 1 1 1 3 1 4 5
3. 10368 Alan Morgan 2 4 2 1 3 3 9 2 4 1
4. 17010 John Gerson 7 9 2 1 1 1 9 3 5 1
5. 23040 Haran Pilpel 3 8 1 1 1 4 4 2 3 10
6. 32400 Dan Blum 2 9 2 1 1 5 3 2 3 10
7. 43200 Peter Smyth 3 9 2 1 1 4 1 2 5 WR
=7. 43200 Dan Tilque 2 4 1 1 1 3 9 4 5 10
9. 48000 Alan Curry 3 8 1 1 5 5 2 1 4 10
10. 90720 Ted Schuerzinger 7 4 2 1 1 2 9 3 3 10
11. 92160 Nick Selwyn 4 8 2 1 3 1 2 3 4 WR
12. 100800 Dan Unger 7 8 1 1 5 1 WR 4 1 5
13. 104976 Don Del Grande 3 9 2 1 3 3 WR 4 3 1
14. 120960 Erland Sommarskog 7 4 2 1 3 2 9 1 4 10
15. 129600 Bruce Bowler 3 9 2 1 3 1 4 4 WR 5
16. 134400 Joshua Kreitzer 7 2 2 1 5 4 4 2 3 10
Adrian Bailey 2 9 1 2 3 2 9 2 4 10
Don Piven 2 9 2 1 WR 5 1 1 5 WR
Kevin Stone 7 9 2 1 3 5 9 1 4 5
Calvin 2 8 1 1 5 WR 9 4 3 WR
Stephen Perry 7 8 1 1 3 5 4 3 WR WR
Chris Johnson 4 9 2 1 WR 4 9 5 4 10
Duke Lefty 4 8 2 2 5 WR WR 1 5 10
Scores of 150,000 or worse are not shown.
And here is the complete list of answers given. Each list shows correct
answers in the order worst to best (most to least popular). The
notation ">>>" means that "more specific variant" scoring was used.
| 0. Name a person who is now (see rule 4.4) alive and has been
| Prime Minister of Canada.
7 Brian Mulroney (born 1939, PM 1984-93)
4 Kim Campbell (born 1947, PM 1993)
3 Joe Clark (born 1939, PM 1979-80)
3 Paul Martin (born 1938, PM 2003-06)
2 Jean Chrétien (born 1934, PM 1993-2003)
2 John Turner (born 1929, PM 1984)
2 Stephen Harper (born 1959, PM 2006-)
I thought the "most obvious" answers were Mulroney, Chrétien, and
Harper, being the two longest-serving ones among the 7 correct answers
and the current one; and I expected people would collide on the others.
But no, they collided on Mulroney instead! He may have a good deal
to answer for, but what did he ever do to deserve that?
| 1. Name a person or organization that has won more than one
| Nobel Prize, either outright or shared.
9 Linus Pauling (chemistry 1954; peace 1962)
8 John Bardeen (physics 1956, 1972)
4 Marie Curie (physics 1903; chemistry 1911)
2 UN High Commissioner for Refugees* (peace 1954, 1981)
With six correct answers available here, the collisions on Pauling
and Bardeen were stunning. Not one entrant named the Red Cross
(the only 3-time winner: peace 1917, 1944, 1963) or Frederick Sanger
(chemistry 1958, 1980).
*Names of institutional winners are abbreviated for convenience.
| 2. Name a prime number that has been used as a contest number
| in the MSB series of Rare Entries contests.
2 17
2 23
2 3
2 37
2 41
2 43
2 67
2 73
1 11
1 19
1 31
1 47
1 61
1 7
1 71
Answers were much better divided this time. I thought there might be
a collision on the double-bluff answer "73", but no, not really.
The 6 correct answers that weren't given were 2, 5, 13, 29, 53, and 59.
| 3. Name a title of a work of fiction, that is also a direct
| (and apparently deliberate) quotation from a previously
| existing work of fiction. For purposes of this question,
| holy books of religions do not count as works of fiction.
2 "To Be or Not to Be" (Melchior Lengyel, Edwin Justus Mayer,
and Ernst Lubitsch movie, quoting the William
Shakespeare play "Hamlet")
1 "A Man Rides Through" (Stephen Donaldson novel, quoting
the John Myers Myers novel "Silverlock")
1 "Brave New World" (Aldous Huxley novel, quoting the William
Shakespeare play "The Tempest")
1 "Cover Her Face" (P.D. James novel, quoting the John Webster
play "The Duchess of Malfi")
1 "Dagger of the Mind" ("Star Trek" TV series episode, quoting
the William Shakespeare play "Macbeth")
1 "How Sharper Than a Serpent's Tooth" ("Star Trek" animated
TV series episode, quoting the William Shakespeare play
"King Lear")
1 "I See Dead People" ("Alias" TV series episode, quoting the
M. Night Shyamalan movie "The Sixth Sense")
1 "Of Mice and Men" (John Steinbeck novella, quoting the Robert
Burns poem "To a Mouse, on Turning Her Up in her Nest
With the Plough")
1 "Pieces of Eight" (John Drake novel, quoting the Robert Louis
Stevenson novel "Treasure Island")
1 "Skulle jag sörja då..." (Jean Bolinder novel, quoting
the Lasse Lucidor poem "Skulle jag sörja då vore
jag tokot")
1 "The Dogs of War" (Frederick Forsyth novel, quoting the William
Shakespeare play "Julius Caesar")
1 "The Restaurant at the End of the Universe" (Douglas Adams
novel, quoting his own radio series "The Hitchhiker's
Guide to the Galaxy")
1 "The World is Not Enough" (Neal Purvis, Robert Wade, and Bruce
Feirstein movie, quoting the Ian Fleming novel "On
Her Majesty's Secret Service")
1 "To Sail Beyond the Sunset" (Robert A. Heinlein novel, quoting
the Alfred Lord Tennyson poem "Ulysses")
1 "To Say Nothing Of The Dog" (Connie Willis novel, quoting
the Jerome K. Jerome novel "Three Men in a Boat")
1 "Trial of Champions" (Ian Livingstone novel, quoting his
own novel "Deathtrap Dungeon")
1 "Uncle Scrooge" (comic book, quoting the Charles Dickens
novella "A Christmas Carol")
1 "Under the Greenwood Tree" (Thomas Hardy novel, quoting
the William Shakespeare play Shakespeare's "As You Like
It")
1 "Vanity Fair" (William Makepeace Thackeray novel, quoting
the John Bunyan novel, "The Pilgrim's Progress, from
This World to That which is to Come")
1 "Vaster than Empires and More Slow" (Ursula K. Le Guin short
story, quoting the Andrew Marvell poem "To His
Coy Mistress")
1 "We'll Always Have Paris" ("Stat Trek: The Next Generation"
TV series episode, quoting the Julius J. and Philip
G. Epstein, Howard Koch, and Casey Robinson movie
"Casablanca")
1 "What Fools These Mortals Be" (Bernard Travaille and Maurice
Wise play, quoting the William Shakespeare play "A
Midsummer Night's Dream")
I knew there were lots of possible answers here, but I was hoping
people would find some way to collide. But almost nobody did.
Perhaps it would have helped if I'd specified that the quotation
must be from an author other than Shakespeare!
| 4. Name a country (see rule 4.1.1) then existing, whose
| government at some time since 1888 ordered or allowed the
| killing of at least 25,000 of its own civilian residents
| as part of a deliberate program of genocide, political
| suppression, or the like.
5 Cambodia
3 Ottoman Empire [= Turkey]
3 Rwanda
3 USSR
1 China
1 Croatia
1 Equatorial Guinea
1 Ethiopia
1 North Korea
1 Pakistan
1 Uganda
WRONG:
1 Chile (a few thousand deaths)
1 German Southwest Africa (not then a country)
Checking the answers to this one was downright depressing. And there are
plenty of additional answers that would also be correct -- including one
very well known one that wasn't given at all.
| 5. Give the Italian name of a city in Italy that has a
| different name (not a nickname) in English. It is all right
| if the Italian name is used in English as well. For example,
| if I had said "French name" and "in Belgium", you might
| answer with "Bruxelles", whose name in English is Brussels.
5 Padova (Padua)
4 Genova (Genoa)
3 Roma (Rome)
2 Livorno (Leghorn)
2 Torino (Turin)
>>> 1 [WRONG] Turin
1 Bressanone (Brixen)
1 Milano (Milan)
1 Napoli (Naples)
1 Siracusa (Syracuse)
1 Trento (Trent)
1 Venezia (Venice)
WRONG:
1 Florence (not Italian name)
1 Turin (not Italian name)
Italy sure has lots of these, doesn't it?
| 6. Name a state or province (see rule 4.1.1) now existing, whose
| name has the superficial meaning that it is the "new" version
| of another, more populous place now existing. For example,
| if I had asked about cities instead of states or provinces,
| "New London" (Connecticut, USA) would be a correct answer.
9 New Mexico (USA, 2,060,000; 112,000,000 in Mexico)
4 Nova Scotia (Canada, 943,000; 5,220,000 in Scotland, UK)
3 Nueva Vizcaya (Philippines, 398,000; 1,150,000 in Biscay, Spain)
2 New Hampshire (USA, 1,320,000; 1,740,000 in ceremonial county
of Hampshire, UK)
1 New Ireland (Papua New Guinea, 118,000; 4,580,000 in Ireland)
1 Nova Gorica (Slovenia, 32,100; 142,000 in Gorizia, Italy)
WRONG:
2 Nuevo León (Mexico, 4,650,000) (only 2,560,000 in whole
of Castilla y León, Spain)
1 New South Wales (Australia, 6,550,000) (only 3,010,000 in whole
of Wales, UK)
I wasn't surprised at the most two popular answers here. Of course
the two other "New" states in the US would be wrong answers, and so
would New Brunswick in Canada.
In most cases populations shown are the most recent figures given at
http://www.citypopulation.de, rounded to 3 significant digits.
| 7. A passenger elevator in good working order will sometimes
| arrive at a floor, stop, and leave again in the same
| direction, with the doors opening and closing but with
| no one getting on or off. Give a reason (not a method)
| why a person might cause this to happen. Reasons that are
| sufficiently similar will be treated as identical.
5 Change of mind
>>> 4 Called elevator, didn't board
>>> 2 Gave up on long wait
>>> 1 Realized cellphone call would be cut off
4 Pushed wrong button [= Pushed wrong button due to dyslexia;
Called elevator for wrong direction]
3 Got off at earlier floor
>>> 2 To fool a pursuer
3 Prankster pushed buttons [= To be a dick]
2 Elevator overcrowded
1 Attempt to cheat in elevator race
1 Attempt to cheat in Rare Entries with unique scenario
1 Distracted and forgot to get off
1 Fell asleep
1 Safety inspection
1 Security guard inspecting floors
This one, as you might guess, was inspired by an actual occurrence: I was
riding an elevator on the way to work and someone pushed the wrong button.
Some of the answers were quite long in the form actually given, and I've
ruthlessly edited them down to produce the above summary. My favorite for
creativity was the "attempt to cheat in Rare Entries", for which the full
answer was given as follows:
Person in the elevator is Rare Entries Contest participant
deliberately inventing unique scenario by stopping at each floor
and yelling "I'm getting a 1 on this question for sure! Purple
monkey dishwasher."
(I realized after writing answer 7 that the elevator passenger
would be violating rule 4.4 by "changing the facts" so he shouldn't
actually get the 1. But I didn't do it, I just described what a
hypothetical person might do, which is all that question 7 asked
for. The ineffectiveness of the hypothetical person's action
doesn't seem to be relevant.)
"Elevator overcrowded" might be a matter of opinion, but I decided not
to count this as a more specific instance of "change of mind" even so.
I can think of at least four correct answers that weren't given,
all of them involving real-world scenarios:
* Store management orders operator of manual elevator to stop at all
floors in case someone wants to get on.
* Elevator programmed to stop at all floors on the Jewish Sabbath, for
the benefit of those who would then consider it a religious violation
to operate electrical controls but not to use automatic machinery.
* Person intends to call only one elevator, but two arrive simultaneously
in the same direction and control system is not sophisticated enough
to stop only one.
* Person intends to be on (say) the 16th floor only very briefly and
expects the elevator to return to ground, so he sends it to 17 and
18 in the hope of catching the same elevator coming back down.
| 8. In general terms (see rule 2.2), name a means for a regular
| traffic of people and/or vehicles to cross between two
| specific points on opposite sides of a river. (Answers like
| "road", that do not relate to how the river is crossed,
| are not acceptable. Answers like "swimming", that could
| allow a crossing between any points, are not acceptable.)
5 Aerial tramway [= Roosevelt-Island-style tram; Transporter
bridge; Transporter bridge gondola]
4 Ferry [= Roll-on roll-off ferry; Cable ferry]
4 Ford
3 Flying fox [= Zip line; Wire-bridge gondola]
3 Tunnel [= Underwater tunnel]
1 Bridge-tunnel
1 Causeway
WRONG:
1 Fallen tree (not suitable for regular traffic)
1 Human-powered cable ferry (too specific)
The term "gondola" is often used for several different types of vehicle,
but those entrants who mentioned it provided enough additional detail
to make clear what was meant.
An aerial tramway, also called an aerial cable car, uses one or two cars
permanently fixed to the drive cable; I decided that a transporter bridge
is essentially an aerial tramway designed for vehicles to ride on it, so
I counted those answers as equivalent.
A flying fox or zip line is usually gravity-driven and suitable only for
one-way traffic (the moving parts then have to be hauled back uphill),
but the question did not specify "a regular two-way traffic". "Wire
bridge" is a brand name based on similar technology and I decided to
treat it as equivalent.
The proper use of "gondola" is for a third related technology, which
typically has a permanently moving cable and multiple cars that can be
attached and detached to/from it for each trip, as in this installation
that I rode across the Rhine earlier this year:
http://farm7.staticflickr.com/6020/5920124098_12f934884a.jpg
Nobody named this.
More interestingly, nobody gave the most obvious answer -- a bridge!
| 9. In many sports the players move about on surfaces divided
| into sections by a standard pattern of straight or curved
| lines. Name such a sport where (in typical games at the
| highest level of play) these standard lines are not all
| marked in the same color. Note: Lines marking the outer
| boundary of the playing area, or provided incidentally
| for purposes unrelated to the sport, do not count.
| Sports involving vehicles do not count.
10 Hockey
5 Curling
1 Australian football
1 Basketball
1 Track
WRONG:
2 Rugby League (colored markings only typical in Australia)
1 Golf (no standard pattern of markings)
1 Roller hockey (typically only one color)
1 Track cycling (uses vehicles)
I hate sports questions.
When I wrote this one, the only answer I knew was correct was hockey.
The rules of hockey specify red and blue lines, and these are used
at all levels of play (in fact, a block or so from my house is a
small arena <
http://www.northtorontoarena.com/>, outside of which
I regularly see piles of snow that are partly red or blue); I was
naively assuming that other sports would be similar.
*Ha!*
For Rugby League, I wasn't even sure which leagues would offer
"games at the highest level of play" as specified in the question.
I decided to trust Wikipedia on this, which says that'd be "the
European Super League, Australasian National Rugby League and French
Elite One Championship". I found rule books from the Rugby League
and the Rugby League International Federation:
http://www.therfl.co.uk/~therflc/clientdocs/rugby_laws_book_2004_.pdf
http://rlifmedia.dyndns.org/docs/rugby_laws_book_2007_%20(2).pdf
but they specify nothing about the color of field markings, though.
On the other hand, the Australian Rugby League has a rulebook
http://crlnsw.com.au/fileadmin/user_upload/Resourse_Centre/ARL_International_
Laws_of_the_Game_2009.pdf
that also claims to be the "International Laws of the Game", but
includes additional sections at the end, and in this added material
it does require two colors of lines.
To resolve this, I then selected 8 teams from the Super League web
site and 4 from the Elite One web site, located their stadiums by a
combination of Google Maps queries and Wikipedia pages, and viewed
the Google Maps aerial (so-called "satellite") imagery for these
stadiums. In all cases it the markings on the field were clearly
visible. Three or four of the stadiums did not have their fields
currently marked for rugby in the Google Maps photos, and some seemed
to have only partial markings (e.g. a grid of lines and no numbers).
But of stadiums I looked at, not one had any lines marked in any color
but white.
I concluded that the use of color on the fields is purely an
Australianism and therefore not "typical at the highest level of play".
I invited the entrants who gave this answer to refute this; one agreed
with me (he'd believed what Wikipedia says on its page about the game,
which I suppose was written by an Australian) and the other did not
answer. So I ruled it wrong.
Next, basketball. In this case it's clear that "the highest level of
play" refers to the NBA. But in NBA Rule #1
http://www.nba.com/analysis/rules_1.html
the only thing about the color of the different lines is that it must
contrast with the colors used to mark zones, such as the free throw zone.
I therefore went to Google Images and looked at some actual NBA arenas
and quickly find that each one has its own color scheme.
Here are two areas where all the lines are the same colors:
http://img188.imageshack.us/img188/2831/38444385.jpg
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ce/OKC_Thunder.JPG
But here are two others where two different colors of line are used:
http://img284.imageshack.us/img284/3953/154167007zmkjfjfs29cu.jpg
http://static.panoramio.com/photos/original/582343.jpg
Furthermore, I quickly found cases where different photos of the same
area taken in different years showed different colors of markings.
I decided to resolve this by checking photos of the home arenas of all
30 NBA teams, and using the first one I found for each arena that had
sufficiently high resolution. Even this was tricky because the Google
Images search often produced false hits, at a web site for a video game
*based on* the NBA. But in the end I found line markings for the NBA
in two or more colors at 17 of the 30 arenas. I decided that a majority
of the arenas was enough to make this the "typical" game, so I accepted
this answer.
In Australian football, again the rule book
http://www.afana.com/drupal5/customfiles/afllaws_11.pdf
does not specify different colors of lines, while Wikipedia claims
that they are used. A quick look at some fields using Google Maps
seemed to show all the lines as being in white, but when I looked more
closely at the specific places where Wikipedia said color was used,
I realized it was correct: certain lines are marked in a combination
of colors and this doesn't show up very clearly in the aerial imagery.
The entrant also cited sources to show that other lines are yellow.
In track, the entrant cited the IAAF files
http://www.iaaf.org/mm/Document/Competitions/TechnicalArea/04/63/95/20081202044225_httppostedfile_Fig_2.2.1.6a_Marking_Outdoor_7462.pdf
which specify colored markings to be used in relay races, and I accepted
that.
In roller hockey, it was again difficult to identify details relating
to the "highest level of play", and there are few photos that Google
Images can find that show the playing surfaces. Further complicating
things is the fact that several versions of the game exist. I was able
to find these pages
http://www.inf.fh-dortmund.de/rollhockey/forms/TechnicalRules_31_12_2010_English.pdf
http://rollerhockey.isport.com/rollerhockey-guides/roller-hockey-rink-dimensions
The first implying that all lines are the same color, and the second
implying that they are all red. (The dot markings, of course, are not
"lines that divide the surface into sections".) The entrant found a
different site where the center circle was shown as blue, but on doing
further checking, got to
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rS-JYae5Z7s
which he says "shows the 2011 World Championships and the lines do
all appear to be red". So, wrong answer.
Finally, in golf, the USGA rules
http://www.usga.org/uploadedFiles/USGAHome/rules/CompleteROGbook.pdf
allow for different colored lines marking two types of hazards (as
well as the outer boundary of the course, which is irrelevant to the
question); but since every golf course is unique, these lines do not
follow a "standard pattern" as required. (I did not check rules of
any other governing bodies.)
Thank you all for playing and keeping this contest series alive.
--
Mark Brader | "There is ample evidence that Mr. Coyote was
Toronto | violating both the laws of gravity and inertia
m...@vex.net | at the time of this incident, and thus he is
| responsible for his own woes." --Stephen Menard