The Mythos Digest Sunday, January 28 2001 Volume 04 : Number 033 In this Issue: Frank montellano Re:

>From: Morgan Foister <feanor@magicnet.net> >Subject: Resource Combo Question > >

Ruling Digest 585 >From: >Subject: Fallen Wizard Questions > >I have a lot of questions regarding playing a Fallen Wizard > >May I use Secrets Books (Minion Minor

Ruling Digest 583 >From: <pallando@bigfoot.de> >Subject: Re: crf15 tourney > >I

Ruling Digest 581 >From: David Cook >Subject: [Van] More questions... > > Most of these have been asked before but I forget the >rulings, so here we go again... >

Ruling Digest 579 >From: "Jason Klank" >Subject: More Questions > >1. Is the Balrog considered a Ringwraith for the effects of Man >female characters

Ruling Digest 578 >From: Eric Silverman <silver@saber.towson.edu> >Subject: Couple of

Ruling Digest 576 >From: "Jean-Paul Keulen" <keulen@phys.leidenuniv.nl> >

Rules Digest 571 >From: "Gerold Feise" <sol_gf@physik.uni-paderborn.de> >

Ruling Digest 569 >From: Dave Stegman >Subject: [van] Q on legendary hoard > >given that playing legendary hoard played on a dragon @home >will prevent it from being

Rules Digest 568 This is a large digest. Please let me know if I missed any Questions. >From: Spaceman >Subject: Q on Ride against the enemy > >so if I have Lady of the golden

MECCG Rules Digest 657 >From: "Oskar" <oskar@netreach.net> >Subject: Rules?

Re: Rules Digest 565 (VAN/ICK) Van wrote: << >From: Oskar, oskar@netreach.net > >But as Oskar pointed out to me recently, Balrog players can still >store them

Ruling Digest 565 >From: Kenneth Switzer <stkenfromva@yahoo.com> >Subject: [Van/Ick]To

Rulings Digest 564 >From: Martin Toggweiler >Subject: [Van/Ick] Can Tom ? > >Can Tom Bombadil tap to stop any agent activities against an >eligible company/character

Rules Digest 563 >From: GndlfThGry@aol.com >Subject: agent questions > >an extremely easy question....what do agents count as in a hero >deck? hazards or are they

Rules Digest 562 From: "Gary Devouges" <gary.devouges@sympatico.ca> Subject: Starter/

Rules Digest 561 >From: Ilkka Launonen <dotsi@nemesis.muhos.fi> >Subject: Question >

Rules Digest 560 >From: GndlfThGry@aol.com >Subject: 2 questions > >1. If I have Saruman in a company with fellowship and he has >orcrist and wizards ring, whats his

Rules Digest 559 >From: Chrisu Jaehnl <chrisutl@sbox.tu-graz.ac.at> >Subject: hi there

MECCG Rules Digest 558 >From: Florian Kugler <floriank@gmx.net> >Subject: Re: Long

Rules Digest 557 >From: Konstantine Athanasiou <elflord@otenet.gr> >Subject: Re: How can

Rules Digest 556 >From: "Oskar" >Subject: [VAN] - rules questions (before Friday please) > >Hey, >Since there haven't been any posts on the list this

Rules Digest 555 >From: Joe Walker <jwalker@dsorkin.wcc.lucent.com> >Subject: Re: VAN/ICH

Van Norton MECCG NetRep Mark Jones wrote: > > Van Norton wrote: > > > > The second ruling plugs two loopholes while only making roadblock a bit > > more powerful

MECCG Rules Digest 554 The following rulings will be effective March 1, 1999: >NEW RULINGS! >

Rules Digest 552 >From: Eric Silverman <silver@saber.towson.edu> >Subject: Re: Rules

Rules Digest 551 >From: Dave Stegman >Subject: [Van] Black Vapour > >here's a Q: > >Doors is in. all spider boosters are in play. >Spider of Morlat in hand

MECCG Rules Digest 550 >From: Horsa@aol.com >Subject: Squatter Decks >Actually I rather like the idea of being able to tap out >characters that exceed the permissible

Rules Digest 549 >From: "Kenneth Switzer" <stkenfromva@hotmail.com> >Subject: