Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Royal Assassin?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Andrew Bowser

unread,
Aug 8, 1995, 3:00:00 AM8/8/95
to
I have the Royal Assassin but I'm looking for a good card to go with it so it can easily destroy a creature.

-BOWZER!!!
--
7

Beau Hale

unread,
Aug 8, 1995, 3:00:00 AM8/8/95
to
In article <DD0Iz...@freenet.carleton.ca>, ce...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA
(Andrew Bowser) wrote:

=>I have the Royal Assassin but I'm looking for a good card to go with it


so it can easily destroy a creature.

=>
=> -BOWZER!!!
=>--
=>7

Twiddle
Icy Manipulator
That Ice age card that works like twiddle

That's just off the top of my head
Thanks
Beau

sle...@access.digex.net

"Things are only impossible until they are not"

Dennis Lee

unread,
Aug 9, 1995, 3:00:00 AM8/9/95
to
try kismet

Don Grey

unread,
Aug 9, 1995, 3:00:00 AM8/9/95
to
In article <DD0Iz...@freenet.carleton.ca>,
ce...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Andrew Bowser) wrote:
>I have the Royal Assassin but I'm looking for a good card to go with it so it
can easily destroy a creature.
>
> -BOWZER!!!


Uh, Try Norrit, or his cheaper cousin Nettling Imp. Force their creatures to
attack then tap to kill them. (This only works on tapping when attacking
creatues). Nettling/Norrit Imps are good also against Time Elementals and
cards that say if the creature attacks the owner takes damage :)

Don Grey
dg...@bangate.compaq.com

Sean Robert Johnson

unread,
Aug 11, 1995, 3:00:00 AM8/11/95
to
Recently Don Grey allegedly wrote:
: Uh, Try Norrit, or his cheaper cousin Nettling Imp. Force their creatures to
: attack then tap to kill them. (This only works on tapping when attacking
: creatues). Nettling/Norrit Imps are good also against Time Elementals and
: cards that say if the creature attacks the owner takes damage :)

Unless the Time Elemental's controller has 4 mana and an IQ of over 9,
allowing him to use the TE's ability to unsummon itself, avoiding the
effects. . .

Srj

Blue rules!

bc...@imap2.asu.edu

unread,
Aug 11, 1995, 3:00:00 AM8/11/95
to
Andrew Bowser (ce...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA) wrote:
: I have the Royal Assassin but I'm looking for a good card to go with it so it can easily destroy a creature.

My assassin deck is black and blue. I prefer Floods, Twiddles, Icy
Manipulators, Eniverate (that new Ice Age cantrip that taps a card.), and
Nettling Imps. I also use 4 Brainstorms, 2 Diabolic Visions, 1 Jayemdaye
Tome, a Jalum Tome, and Sivitri Scarzasm (sp?) It's a fun deck that no
one will play against me in team games. It's a little slow and leaves
much to desire offensivly, but Sengirs help. It goes through the deck
really quick. Please no flames about how your deck will kill mine,
there's always a deck that will beat another.
--
*** ***
*** -------------------------------------------------- ***
*** | Feeble screams from forests unknown; | ***
*** | A lost, forgotten, sad spirit: Bur...@asu.edu | ***
*** -------------------------------------------------- ***
*** ***
************* *************
************* *************
*** ***
*** ***

owen...@fn1.freenet.edmonton.ab.ca

unread,
Aug 12, 1995, 3:00:00 AM8/12/95
to
Andrew Bowser (ce...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA) wrote:
: I have the Royal Assassin but I'm looking for a good card to go with it so it can easily destroy a creature.

I think a black card , word of binding.
--
Owen Fraser email: owen...@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca


Todd Lee

unread,
Aug 14, 1995, 3:00:00 AM8/14/95
to

Would unsummoning the Norrit work as well (I've been pondering this
for a long time).

---
To...@Interlog.Com


James M Mudge

unread,
Aug 14, 1995, 3:00:00 AM8/14/95
to
In article <40egbl$6...@news.asu.edu>, <bc...@imap2.asu.edu> wrote:
>Andrew Bowser (ce...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA) wrote:
>: I have the Royal Assassin but I'm looking for a good card to go with
>: it so it can easily destroy a creature.

>My assassin deck is black and blue. I prefer Floods, Twiddles, Icy

>Manipulators, Eniverate (that new Ice Age cantrip that taps a card.), and
>Nettling Imps. I also use 4 Brainstorms, 2 Diabolic Visions, 1 Jayemdaye

>Tome, a Jalum Tome, and Sivitri Scarzasm (sp?).

One addition that I made to a like deck was Xenic Poltergise (T:
animate artifact). Having a problem with a meddlesome Icy? Jester's
Cap gotcha worried? That Ivory Tower being just a *little* too
benificial? No problem! Just tap the target artifact with your Icy,
animate it with the Poltergise, and then finish it off with the Assassin.

'Nuff said.

-Boston Jim

Michael D. Phoenix

unread,
Aug 14, 1995, 3:00:00 AM8/14/95
to

Nope. Removing the source of an effect does not remove the effect.

If the Norrit targets the TE, and then in response the TE targets the
Norrit, you end up with:

1) an unsummoned Norrit
2) a tapped TE
3) a TE which must attack or die.

End result; eventually, a dead TE.

Much better to have the TE unsummon itself, if your goal is to preserve the
TE for later use.

Mickey.

Mark Phaedrus

unread,
Aug 14, 1995, 3:00:00 AM8/14/95
to
In article <40ntso$e...@steel.interlog.com>, to...@interlog.com (Todd Lee) wrote:

> s...@saucer.cc.umr.edu (Sean Robert Johnson ) wrote:
>
> >Recently Don Grey allegedly wrote:

> >: Uh, Try Norrit, or his cheaper cousin Nettling Imp. Force their
creatures to
> >: attack then tap to kill them. (This only works on tapping when attacking

> >: creatues). Nettling/Norrit Imps are good also against Time Elementals and
> >: cards that say if the creature attacks the owner takes damage :)
> >Unless the Time Elemental's controller has 4 mana and an IQ of over 9,
> >allowing him to use the TE's ability to unsummon itself, avoiding the
> >effects. . .
> Would unsummoning the Norrit work as well (I've been pondering this
> for a long time).

No. Destroying or countering the source of a (non-continuous) effect
does nothing to prevent or counter the effect. Norritt's effect isn't
continuous, so Unsummoning it won't work.

--
\o\ If you're interested in books/stories with transformation themes,\o\
\o\please try <URL:http://www.halcyon.com/phaedrus/Menu.html>, or \o\
/o/anonymous-ftp to ftp.halcyon.com in /local/phaedrus/translist. /o/
/o/ Comments and submissions to this list are always welcome. /o/

Mike Marcelais

unread,
Aug 14, 1995, 3:00:00 AM8/14/95
to
My spies caught Todd Lee typing:

| s...@saucer.cc.umr.edu (Sean Robert Johnson ) wrote:

| >Recently Don Grey allegedly wrote:
| >: Uh, Try Norrit, or his cheaper cousin Nettling Imp. Force their creatures to
| >: attack then tap to kill them. (This only works on tapping when attacking
| >: creatues). Nettling/Norrit Imps are good also against Time Elementals and
| >: cards that say if the creature attacks the owner takes damage :)

| >Unless the Time Elemental's controller has 4 mana and an IQ of over 9,
| >allowing him to use the TE's ability to unsummon itself, avoiding the
| >effects. . .

| Would unsummoning the Norrit work as well (I've been pondering this
| for a long time).

Nope, once his effect is announced, is not countered, and the target is legal
when it resolves, then the full effect will happen regardless of the source
of the effect. Since Unsummon doesn't say it counters the special effects of
the creature being unsummoned, Noritt's poke will still work.

--

+------------------------+----------------------------+
| Mike Marcelais | mrma...@eos.ncsu.edu |
| Moonstone Dragon | Magic: The Gathering Judge |
| -==(UDIC)==- | Author of ChrHack 2.3 |
+-----------------------------------------------------+

Kyle Nishioka

unread,
Aug 14, 1995, 3:00:00 AM8/14/95
to
Todd Lee (to...@interlog.com) wrote:

: s...@saucer.cc.umr.edu (Sean Robert Johnson ) wrote:

: >Recently Don Grey allegedly wrote:
: >: Uh, Try Norrit, or his cheaper cousin Nettling Imp. Force their creatures to
: >: attack then tap to kill them. (This only works on tapping when attacking
: >: creatues). Nettling/Norrit Imps are good also against Time Elementals and
: >: cards that say if the creature attacks the owner takes damage :)

: >Unless the Time Elemental's controller has 4 mana and an IQ of over 9,
: >allowing him to use the TE's ability to unsummon itself, avoiding the
: >effects. . .

: Would unsummoning the Norrit work as well (I've been pondering this
: for a long time).

Nope. Removing the source of an effect will not counter the effect.

--
Kyle
nk...@uhunix3.its.hawaii.edu

#include <std_disclaimer.h>


0 new messages