Stupid Malkavian/Antitribu question
Morgan Vening
Nosferatu deck, Malkav Antitribu deck.
Nos deck plays Malkavian Dementia. Attempts to steal Hannibal (Malk
Anti Cardinal). Rule 10.2 only refers to requirements for playing a
card.
Excerpt 10.2. A vampire of one of the antitribu clans does not
qualify to play a card that requires the counterpart, and vice versa.
It would seem to intimate that it would also mean can't be the target
of said card also, but that kind of fell on deaf ears.
So, just for the record, there is no mechanical similarity between
Anarch Gangrel, Malkavian, and Malkavian antitribu. IE, the name is
nothing more than a label, and Malk-Antitribu could quite easily have
been called Sons of Dementia?
Morgan Vening
Jozxyqk
> So, just for the record, there is no mechanical similarity between
> Anarch Gangrel, Malkavian, and Malkavian antitribu. IE, the name is
> nothing more than a label, and Malk-Antitribu could quite easily have
> been called Sons of Dementia?
"Anarch" has nothing to do with clan. An Anarch Gangrel, an Independent
Gangrel, and a Camarilla Gangrel (and a Gangrel turned Sabbat by Into the
Fire), are all Gangrel.
But a Gangrel Antitribu is *not* a Gangrel (even if the Gangrel Antitribu
has managed to join the Camarilla).
And a Gangrel is *not* a Gangrel Antitribu.
Same goes for all "Foo" and "Foo Antitribu".
Morgan Vening
wrote:
I used Anarch Gangrel specifically for the fact it was Independant.
Thereforee it is neither Sabbat or Camarilla. Hence, there was no
"Well, there is a similarity because..." I suppose I could have used
another Independant Clan. But my point stands, Antitribu does not
equal similarity of any kind with non-Antitribu.
Morgan Vening
LSJ
Correct. Gangrel is not Gangrel antitribu in the exact same way that
Gangrel is not Malkavian.
--
LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc.
Links to V:TES news, rules, cards, utilities, and tournament calendar:
http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/