Rowan ring versus blood rage or blood fury

M.N.H. Wilkinson

unread,

Jun 22, 1995, 3:00:00 AM6/22/95

to

I have recently had a game in which I had black cat with the rowan ring vs
Quinton Macdonald.I used the strike:paralyse on him and he used blood rage.I
thought he was paralysed but he argued that weapons against blood rage have no
effect.I looked on the card and it said that weapons used against blood rage
do NO DAMAGE not HAVE NO EFFECT.I gave up arguing and let him have his way but
I would like official confirmation one way or the other.Have I been cheated?
Mike(Lord of shadows)

Joseph Cochran

unread,

Jun 22, 1995, 3:00:00 AM6/22/95

to

In article <min4mnhw....@leeds.ac.uk>,

Well, paralyze is listed as a special combat effect, not as
damage, and Blood Rage does specify damage, so I'd say that the Ring is
indeed going to paralyze Quinton.

| If you've got a hot lead on a new | *--Joe--*
| PC game, call the announce line at | js...@vt.edu
| ** csi...@discus.ise.vt.edu ** |
+-------------------------------------+----------------------------------
"There. That should do nicely. After all, we don't want the locals to
see grannies clipped to trash bins by their teeth, do we?" -- Mr. Gone

Paul Schaaf

unread,

Jun 22, 1995, 3:00:00 AM6/22/95

to

On Thu, 22 Jun 1995, M.N.H. Wilkinson wrote:

> I have recently had a game in which I had black cat with the rowan ring vs
> Quinton Macdonald.I used the strike:paralyse on him and he used blood rage.I
> thought he was paralysed but he argued that weapons against blood rage have no
> effect.I looked on the card and it said that weapons used against blood rage
> do NO DAMAGE not HAVE NO EFFECT.I gave up arguing and let him have his way but
> I would like official confirmation one way or the other.Have I been cheated?

> Mike(Lord of shadows)

That's what Blood Rage does, except that now it's a Thaumaturgy card and
not a Fortitude card so Quinton shouldn't be able to use it. Now if only
they'd get rid of that obfuscate symbol on Concealed Weapon.

---------
Paul Schaaf
sch...@u.washington.edu

mike bist

unread,

Jun 29, 1995, 3:00:00 AM6/29/95

to

Paul Schaaf (sch...@u.washington.edu) wrote:

: That's what Blood Rage does, except that now it's a Thaumaturgy card and

: not a Fortitude card so Quinton shouldn't be able to use it. Now if only
: they'd get rid of that obfuscate symbol on Concealed Weapon.

When did blood rage become a thaumaturgy card?

--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Ah, the CHAOTIC FURY of a distant voice,
Michael Bist | "No Mr. Policeman, I didn't run over your
sid...@umdsun2.umd.umich.edu | donut on purpose" :-p>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

.

unread,

Jun 29, 1995, 3:00:00 AM6/29/95

to

Blood Rage is actually a Thaumaturgy card, right? I had been told this
by someone and it makes sense, because Thaumaturgy has one too few cards,
while Fortitude has one too many and Blood Rage resembles Blood Fury.

Thomas R Wylie

unread,

Jun 30, 1995, 3:00:00 AM6/30/95

to

Blood Rage has errata to be a Thaumaturgy card. This errata was
released in early May.

Tom Wylie rec.games.trading-cards.* Network Representative for
aa...@cats.ucsc.edu Wizards of the Coast, Inc.

mike bist

unread,

Jul 1, 1995, 3:00:00 AM7/1/95

to

. (eter...@wam.umd.edu) wrote:
: Blood Rage is actually a Thaumaturgy card, right? I had been told this

: by someone and it makes sense, because Thaumaturgy has one too few cards,
: while Fortitude has one too many and Blood Rage resembles Blood Fury

Blood Rage is a fortitude card, rarely use it though. (Gangrel Deck)

Clarence

unread,

Jul 4, 1995, 3:00:00 AM7/4/95

to

Hey, mike, in the Jyhad FAQ, it is said that Blood Rage is a THAUMATURGY card,
as said eter...@wam.umd.edu, it makes sense and it is right!

Clarence Pickmann of the magnificent TOREADOR clan