Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
True Faith Q:
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Roger Carhult
Dec 12, 2001, 9:11:12 PM12/12/01
to
If played on a vampire, does it cost 1+2 pool, or just 2 pool? It would have
been betetr if card text said "pay an additional 1/2 pool to play on a
vampire" instead of "2pool" since there's already a pool cost to the card
and now you don't know if that's included in the cost...
been betetr if card text said "pay an additional 1/2 pool to play on a
vampire" instead of "2pool" since there's already a pool cost to the card
and now you don't know if that's included in the cost...
Roger
LSJ
Dec 13, 2001, 5:43:36 AM12/13/01
to
The card costs 1 pool. The effect (if played on a non-mortal) costs 2 pool.
--
LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc.
Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules:
http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/
Roger Carhult
Dec 13, 2001, 1:05:12 PM12/13/01
to
"LSJ" <vte...@white-wolf.com> wrote in message
news:3C188658...@white-wolf.com...
> Roger Carhult wrote:
> >
> > If played on a vampire, does it cost 1+2 pool, or just 2 pool? It would
have
> > been betetr if card text said "pay an additional 1/2 pool to play on a
> > vampire" instead of "2pool" since there's already a pool cost to the
card
> > and now you don't know if that's included in the cost...
>
> The card costs 1 pool. The effect (if played on a non-mortal) costs 2
pool.
It was as I feared then :( Who would ever ay 3 pool for something like
that.... Sure, if you *know* you'll face a devious Mind Rape deck maybe, but
then I'd rather make an intercept deck. And in any case, you can't make
cards based on that people know what others are playing, and then this card
sucks (the 3 pool variant that is, but it's nt that good otherwise either).
Roger
0 new messages