Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

"Non-Camarilla" vs Independent vs Sabbat

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Jozxyqk

unread,
Feb 2, 2001, 2:51:52 PM2/2/01
to
Are there any cards which only affect (or require)
"Non-Camarilla" vampires, which also mean "Non-Sabbat"?
It seems that alot of cards were intended to only
affect the Independents, but they didn't have a word for
it yet. I was wondering if there was any errata to that
effect, or if I am to assume that all cards which say
"Requires a Non-Camarilla Vampire" can require a Sabbat
vamp as well.

Thanks.

James Coupe

unread,
Feb 2, 2001, 3:05:03 PM2/2/01
to
Jozxyqk <jfeu...@eecs.tufts.edu> writes:

> Are there any cards which only affect (or require)
> "Non-Camarilla" vampires, which also mean "Non-Sabbat"?

No.

Non-Camarilla means "Not a member of the Camarilla" i.e. independent
or Sabbat.

There are no cards which require *only* independent vampires. (And
are not, say, Setite only or whatever.)

> It seems that alot of cards were intended to only
> affect the Independents, but they didn't have a word for
> it yet.

True. However, this was known when the Sabbat was designed and
released, and it's not been a major problem.

> I was wondering if there was any errata to that
> effect, or if I am to assume that all cards which say
> "Requires a Non-Camarilla Vampire" can require a Sabbat
> vamp as well.

You are.

However, it is theoretically possible that Final Nights will contain
"Requires an Independent vampire" type cards.

--
James Coupe | PGP Key 0x5D623D5D
"A bit of urine here and there, perhaps. It adds charm and character."
- Mark Carroll, ucam.chat
"Did you have weasel lock?" - Derek Ray, rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad

LSJ

unread,
Feb 2, 2001, 3:22:22 PM2/2/01
to
Jozxyqk <jfeu...@eecs.tufts.edu> wrote:
> Are there any cards which only affect (or require)
> "Non-Camarilla" vampires, which also mean "Non-Sabbat"?
> It seems that alot of cards were intended to only
> affect the Independents, but they didn't have a word for
> it yet. I was wondering if there was any errata to that
> effect, or if I am to assume that all cards which say

No errata to that effect.

> "Requires a Non-Camarilla Vampire" can require a Sabbat
> vamp as well.

It doesn't require a Sabbat vampire, but a Sabbat vampire
would meet the "Non-Camarilla" requirement.

Any card that means "Non-Camarilla and Non-Sabbat" would
say "Independent" instead.

--
LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) VTES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc.
Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules:
http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/

0 new messages