Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Q: Form of Mist

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Greg Faulkner

unread,
Mar 24, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/24/97
to

Question:

Can a vampire use Form of Mist(superior) to continue an already successful
action?

For example:
Minion A Ambushes Minion B.
The action is unblocked.
Minion A plays Form of Mist.
Combat starts over.

Also, can Minion A continue to play additional Forms of Mist(superior) in the
second combat? and third?

Greg


Robert Goudie

unread,
Mar 25, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/25/97
to

You cannot play the FoM in this situation. I use, for my authority, the
rule that you cannot play a card to add stealth if that stealth is not
required to overcome a block attempt being made at equal or greater
intercept.

However, if the action were blocked, a FoM could be played to begin
another combat.

- Robert

......................................................................
:The opinions expressed here are strictly my own delusional ramblings:
:and do not reflect the opinions of The Walt Disney Company. :
: :
:Robert Goudie robert...@studio.disney.com:
:LA Tourny Info -> http://www.cs.ucr.edu/~ezix/other/rg/vtourn_1.html:
:....................................................................:
:Da pony run, he jump he pitch. He t'row my master in da ditch. :
:He died and da jury wondered why. Da verdict was the blue tail fly.:
:....................................................................:

Robert Goudie

unread,
Mar 25, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/25/97
to

Greg Faulkner wrote:
>
> Question:
>
> Can a vampire use Form of Mist(superior) to continue an already successful
> action?
>
> For example:
> Minion A Ambushes Minion B.
> The action is unblocked.
> Minion A plays Form of Mist.
> Combat starts over.
>
> Also, can Minion A continue to play additional Forms of Mist(superior) in the
> second combat? and third?
>
> Greg

Oh, another reason you can't do it. The "continue" text assumes an
interuption (or block) of your attempted action.

Robert


--

L. Scott Johnson

unread,
Mar 25, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/25/97
to

Greg Faulkner wrote:
> Can a vampire use Form of Mist(superior) to continue an already successful
> action?

Yes.

From: aa...@cats.ucsc.edu (Thomas R Wylie)
Newsgroups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad
Subject: VTES Rules Team Rulings: 10/17/95
Date: 17 Oct 1995 05:39:07 GMT
Message-ID: <45vfhr$8...@darkstar.UCSC.EDU>

You may continue an action that has already been considered successful.
For example, if a Bum's Rush is successful, you may play superior Form of
Mist during that combat to continue the action, in which case a second
combat may start (but the action can then be blocked). Note that if you
complete the action again, you get all of its effects again. For example,
if you complete Bum's Rush again, you would get an optional maneuver in the
second combat.

> For example:
> Minion A Ambushes Minion B.
> The action is unblocked.
> Minion A plays Form of Mist.
> Combat starts over.
>
> Also, can Minion A continue to play additional Forms of Mist(superior) in the
> second combat? and third?

Yes, and yes, ...

--
L. Scott Johnson (vte...@regency.wizards.com)
Official VtES Net.Rep for Wizards of the Coast.
(*) - Subject to review by Rules Team

L. Scott Johnson

unread,
Mar 25, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/25/97
to Robert...@studio.disney.com

Robert Goudie wrote:
> Greg Faulkner wrote:
> > Can a vampire use Form of Mist(superior) to continue an already successful
> > action?
>
> You cannot play the FoM in this situation. I use, for my authority, the
> rule that you cannot play a card to add stealth if that stealth is not
> required to overcome a block attempt being made at equal or greater
> intercept.
>
> However, if the action were blocked, a FoM could be played to begin
> another combat.

Good point.

I'll pass this along to the RT and see what the reason is for allowing
uneeded stealth to be played in their prior ruling (or, hopefully, to
get the ruling reversed to match what you have just said).

Thanks for the suggestion.

0 new messages