Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

LSJ - Joaquina Amaya and Jack of Both Sides

4 views
Skip to first unread message

Slytherin

unread,
Apr 7, 2005, 6:54:40 AM4/7/05
to
Tried to find the answer but couldn't.

If Joaquina Amaya tried to use Jack of Both Sides to equip with a .44
Magnum, would she get her inbuilt +1 stealth on equip actions.

I would say yes, as The Summonng at superior is a recruit ally action,
but Charming Lobby isn't a political action (or at least isn't as far
as we can make out from the wordings).

Cheers

Andy
VEKN Setite Ruler of Cambridge

LSJ

unread,
Apr 7, 2005, 7:55:30 AM4/7/05
to
"Slytherin" <an...@operamail.com> wrote in message
news:1112871280.3...@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

> Tried to find the answer but couldn't.
>
> If Joaquina Amaya tried to use Jack of Both Sides to equip with a .44
> Magnum, would she get her inbuilt +1 stealth on equip actions.

Yes.

> I would say yes, as The Summonng at superior is a recruit ally action,
> but Charming Lobby isn't a political action (or at least isn't as far
> as we can make out from the wordings).


The Charming Lobby action is a political action (card text). The card is
not a political action card (cannot be burned for a vote, for example),
however.

--
LSJ (vtesr...@TRAPwhite-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep (Remove spam trap to reply).
V:TES homepage: http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/
Though effective, appear to be ineffective -- Sun Tzu

0 new messages