Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
[LSJ] Muricia's Call
10 views
Skip to first unread message
XZealot
Jan 20, 2004, 10:16:48 AM1/20/04
to
I was looking through some of the old errata, rulings, and
clarifications. It states there that if a retainer is brought into
play by any method other than "Employ Retainer" then the retainer is
brought in at the basic level of the card.
clarifications. It states there that if a retainer is brought into
play by any method other than "Employ Retainer" then the retainer is
brought in at the basic level of the card.
If this is true then If Howler who has superior Animalism used Muricia
Call at Superior to get a Raven Spy out of his library. Then that
Raven Spy would only have 2 life (1 for basic Animalism and 1 extra
for Muricia's Call).
Is that correct, even though Howler has superior Animalism?
Comments Welcome,
Norman S. Brown, Jr.
XZealot
Archon of the Swamp
LSJ
Jan 20, 2004, 10:21:03 AM1/20/04
to
XZealot wrote:
> I was looking through some of the old errata, rulings, and
> clarifications. It states there that if a retainer is brought into
> play by any method other than "Employ Retainer" then the retainer is
> brought in at the basic level of the card.
>
> If this is true then If Howler who has superior Animalism used Muricia
> Call at Superior to get a Raven Spy out of his library. Then that
> Raven Spy would only have 2 life (1 for basic Animalism and 1 extra
> for Muricia's Call).
>
> Is that correct, even though Howler has superior Animalism?
> I was looking through some of the old errata, rulings, and
> clarifications. It states there that if a retainer is brought into
> play by any method other than "Employ Retainer" then the retainer is
> brought in at the basic level of the card.
>
> If this is true then If Howler who has superior Animalism used Muricia
> Call at Superior to get a Raven Spy out of his library. Then that
> Raven Spy would only have 2 life (1 for basic Animalism and 1 extra
> for Muricia's Call).
>
> Is that correct, even though Howler has superior Animalism?
Card text: "This vampire employs that retainer", so the action is an
"employ retainer" action. The ruling on actions that are not "employ
retainer" actions doesn't apply.
--
LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc.
Links to V:TES news, rules, cards, utilities, and tournament calendar:
http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/
David Wilson
Jan 20, 2004, 12:49:15 PM1/20/04
to
> > I was looking through some of the old errata, rulings, and
> > clarifications. It states there that if a retainer is brought into
> > play by any method other than "Employ Retainer" then the retainer is
> > brought in at the basic level of the card.
> >
> > If this is true then If Howler who has superior Animalism used Muricia
> > Call at Superior to get a Raven Spy out of his library. Then that
> > Raven Spy would only have 2 life (1 for basic Animalism and 1 extra
> > for Muricia's Call).
> >
> > Is that correct, even though Howler has superior Animalism?
>
> Card text: "This vampire employs that retainer", so the action is an
> "employ retainer" action. The ruling on actions that are not "employ
> retainer" actions doesn't apply.
If Howler then untaps somehow, she can still employ a raven spy with the> > clarifications. It states there that if a retainer is brought into
> > play by any method other than "Employ Retainer" then the retainer is
> > brought in at the basic level of the card.
> >
> > If this is true then If Howler who has superior Animalism used Muricia
> > Call at Superior to get a Raven Spy out of his library. Then that
> > Raven Spy would only have 2 life (1 for basic Animalism and 1 extra
> > for Muricia's Call).
> >
> > Is that correct, even though Howler has superior Animalism?
>
> Card text: "This vampire employs that retainer", so the action is an
> "employ retainer" action. The ruling on actions that are not "employ
> retainer" actions doesn't apply.
card, right?
LSJ
Jan 20, 2004, 1:30:05 PM1/20/04
to
David Wilson wrote:
>>>If this is true then If Howler who has superior Animalism used Muricia
>>>Call at Superior to get a Raven Spy out of his library. Then that
>>>Raven Spy would only have 2 life (1 for basic Animalism and 1 extra
>>>for Muricia's Call).
>>>
>>>Is that correct, even though Howler has superior Animalism?
>>
>>Card text: "This vampire employs that retainer", so the action is an
>>"employ retainer" action. The ruling on actions that are not "employ
>>retainer" actions doesn't apply.
>
> If Howler then untaps somehow, she can still employ a raven spy with the
> card, right?
>>>If this is true then If Howler who has superior Animalism used Muricia
>>>Call at Superior to get a Raven Spy out of his library. Then that
>>>Raven Spy would only have 2 life (1 for basic Animalism and 1 extra
>>>for Muricia's Call).
>>>
>>>Is that correct, even though Howler has superior Animalism?
>>
>>Card text: "This vampire employs that retainer", so the action is an
>>"employ retainer" action. The ruling on actions that are not "employ
>>retainer" actions doesn't apply.
>
> If Howler then untaps somehow, she can still employ a raven spy with the
> card, right?
... with the Raven Spy card, yes.
... with the Muricia's Call card, no.
0 new messages