Bonding
WOL DannyX
any of the answers, I will ask again :) Can superioir bonding be used to
give the stealth bonus to a non-bleed action, like a vote action or such?
It has been argued to death in my group from both perspective, so I wanted
to get the right answer.
Thank You
Danny
The oppinions above are mine,
and are subject to change at
any time without prior notice.
The Corrupter
DannyX) wrote:
> This has prolly already been asked many times, but since I haven't seen
> any of the answers, I will ask again :) Can superioir bonding be used to
> give the stealth bonus to a non-bleed action, like a vote action or such?
> It has been argued to death in my group from both perspective, so I wanted
> to get the right answer.
Unfortunately, no. I made this mistake for some time before I was
corrected. If someone can give me the rationale (I always believed you
could use _part_ of a card in Jyhad), I would appreciate it. Much thanks.
"I can send and receive e-mail even over the Internet"-aol commercial
@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$
# Adrian Sullivan sull...@cslab.uwlax.edu Spoutingly yours 8^) #
$ GAT/CS/O/WS R+++* tv&--- b++(+++)&+ t X++&-- 5->? e+*>++++ PS+&-+ @
# PE&++&- C(+++)$ UX+>+++$ N++(+) K+>++++ w---$>? M++$ r(+) y*+? 3.1#
@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$@#$
James R. McClure Jr.
>This has prolly already been asked many times, but since I haven't seen
>any of the answers, I will ask again :) Can superioir bonding be used to
>give the stealth bonus to a non-bleed action, like a vote action or such?
>It has been argued to death in my group from both perspective, so I wanted
>to get the right answer.
Peace Danny,
No, Bonding (inferior or superior) may only be used as an action modifier
for a Bleed action.
Nil carborundum illigitimi,
James R. McClure Jr.
The OS/2 Apostle
<insert disclaimer here>
WOL DannyX
boon, can you or anyone else direct me toward somewhere official where
this rulling was made (if such thing exist), not to say that I doubt your
word, but my group isn't as trusting as I am. :)
L. Scott Johnson
WOL DannyX <wold...@aol.com> wrote:
>Thank you James for such prompt response, but alas I beg you for another
>boon, can you or anyone else direct me toward somewhere official where
>this rulling was made (if such thing exist), not to say that I doubt your
>word, but my group isn't as trusting as I am. :)
>
Certainly:
(The complete text of this rules summary is available on my web site:
http://www.math.sc.edu/~sjohnson/jyhad/DTR.html).
From: aa...@hal.COM (Tom Wylie)
Newsgroups: rec.games.deckmaster
Subject: NEW: Rulings summary for Jyhad
Date: 9 Nov 1994 13:11:24 -0800
Message-ID: <39rdts$s...@perv.hal.COM>
You cannot play a modifier which doesn't match the action being modified.
For example, you can only use Bonding during a bleed.
[...]
Bonding:
The superior version cannot be used to increase the stealth of a
non-bleed action; action modifiers which modify/replace bleed may
only be used on bleed actions.
--
-----
L. Scott Johnson (lsc...@crl.com) | The opinions expressed are mine
Graphics Specialist and V:tES Rulemonger | and subject to card text
L. Scott Johnson
>In article <49e3kv$9...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, wold...@aol.com (WOL
>DannyX) wrote:
>> This has prolly already been asked many times, but since I haven't seen
>> any of the answers, I will ask again :) Can superioir bonding be used to
>> give the stealth bonus to a non-bleed action, like a vote action or such?
>> It has been argued to death in my group from both perspective, so I wanted
>> to get the right answer.
>Unfortunately, no. I made this mistake for some time before I was
>corrected. If someone can give me the rationale (I always believed you
>could use _part_ of a card in Jyhad), I would appreciate it. Much thanks.
Rationale: It is a bleed modifier, with a side effect of increased stealth.
Except that: you may not use the superior version unless you *need* the
side effect.
Cards which may be used to partial effect:
Anarch Troublemaker - may tap one or two minions
Brujah Frenzy - can be used to block an action even if combat is impossible
due to the target Brujah being in torpor (attempting self-rescue, or
whatever). In this case, the action will be blocked, but no combat will
occur.
Cards which cannot be used for partial effect:
Bonding - Must use the bleed enhancer - no adding stealth to non-bleed
actions.
Brujah Frenzy - even though the taget victim is not the blocking minion
(the action is simply blocked), BF may not block the action unless there
is a suitable (untapped, ready, opposing) minion to not block the action.
That is, you might think that a Brujah could easily go into a frenzy
even if no one was around, but that is not the case.
The Second Tradition - Domain
You must have a P/J who is *both* tapped and in need of intercept to
play the card. An untapped Prince may not gain intercept with 2nd Trad,
nor may a tapped Prince untap with 2nd. Trad if the acting minion is
not at +X stealth.
--
L. Scott Johnson (sjoh...@math.sc.edu) | These opinions are mine and
http://www.math.sc.edu/~sjohnson | are subject to card text.
Graphics Specialist and V:tES Rulemonger. |