Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Bribes and ousting LSJ

11 views
Skip to first unread message

librarian

unread,
Apr 23, 2010, 1:42:23 PM4/23/10
to
What if you call a vote that will oust someone (Meth a calls KRC, Meth B
has 3 pool left), and then put out a bribes. If Meth B votes for it, I
assume they are not ousted, because they will receive the pool for bribes
"when the results ... are tallied", and then take the 3 pool damage.

Right? or Wrong?

best -

chris


Bribes [Jyhad:C, VTES:C, Sabbat:C, SW:C/PV2, CE:PTo2/PV2, Anarchs:PAB4,
KMW:PAn3/PAl, Third:PB3]
Cardtype: Action Modifier
Only usable during a referendum before votes are cast.
Gain 1 pool. Any other Methuselah who votes in favor of and does not vote
against the referendum gains 1 pool when the results of the referendum are
tallied.
Artist: Corey Macourek

The Lasombra

unread,
Apr 23, 2010, 2:06:45 PM4/23/10
to
On Apr 23, 1:42 pm, librarian wrote:
> What if you call a vote that will oust someone

This was a more interesting scenario when you were "ousting LSJ", as
in the subject....

>(Meth a calls KRC, Meth B has 3 pool left), and then put out a bribes.  If Meth B votes for it, I
> assume they are not ousted, because they will receive the pool for bribes
> "when the results ... are tallied", and then take the 3 pool damage.

You are right, they will not be ousted for the reasons you have
specified.

LSJ

unread,
Apr 23, 2010, 2:41:11 PM4/23/10
to
On Apr 23, 2:06 pm, The Lasombra <thelasom...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 23, 1:42 pm, librarian wrote:
>
> > What if you call a vote that will oust someone
>
> This was a more interesting scenario when you were "ousting LSJ", as
> in the subject....
>
> >(Meth a calls KRC, Meth B has 3 pool left), and then put out a bribes.  If Meth B votes for it, I
> > assume they are not ousted, because they will receive the pool for bribes
> > "when the results ... are tallied", and then take the 3 pool damage.
>
> You are right, they will not be ousted for the reasons you have
> specified.

Correct.

Kushiel

unread,
Apr 23, 2010, 3:55:38 PM4/23/10
to
On Apr 23, 2:06 pm, The Lasombra <thelasom...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> This was a more interesting scenario when you were "ousting LSJ", as
> in the subject....

Well, if there's a Bribes on it, I've got two in favor.

John Eno

0 new messages