Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

[LSJ] Sudden Reversal

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Morgan Vening

unread,
Apr 29, 2004, 6:28:31 AM4/29/04
to
I've had this argument IRL, and have just had the same argument while
chatting in ButtonMen, but is it possible to have the following occur.

Player : Plays Obnoxious Master Card (Anarch Revolt, Zillah's Valley,
Tomb of Ramses, whatever)

Player's Predator : Plays Sudden Reversal on Obnoxious Master Card.

Predator's Predator : Plays Sudden Reversal on Sudden Reversal.

I have been told this can't/doesn't work, yet the wording...
Master: out-of-turn. Burn a master card played by another Methuselah
as that card is played. That card has no effect (no cost is paid)...
doesn't seem to exclude it.

It'd be different if Player above tried to SR the SR (besides already
playing a Master, it's also not OOT, so that won't work either. But
why wouldn't independantly used SR's allow nullification of used ones?

Morgan Vening

LSJ

unread,
Apr 29, 2004, 7:01:38 AM4/29/04
to
Morgan Vening wrote:
> Player's Predator : Plays Sudden Reversal on Obnoxious Master Card.
>
> Predator's Predator : Plays Sudden Reversal on Sudden Reversal.
>
> I have been told this can't/doesn't work, yet the wording...

It works just fine.

--
LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc.
Links to V:TES news, rules, cards, utilities, and tournament calendar:
http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/

Frogbear

unread,
Apr 29, 2004, 7:24:34 AM4/29/04
to
Hey Morgan

Seeing this happened in a game that we both were involved in a while ago, I
guess it can happen.....

....hence it is possible.

: P

hehehe

"Morgan Vening" <mor...@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:vol190t0ljgji63q6...@4ax.com...

0 new messages