Rigby vs. Writ of Acceptance.
evilp...@my-deja.com
to equip Ian Wallingford(bishop) with a Writ of Acceptance, and failed
to generate intercept. Ian was the only bishop controlled by my
predator, and had 2 blood.
So. Does Rigby move a blood to Ian, or does the Writ action succeed
first? The table decided Rigby should move a blood, as the block
attempt fails before the action is successful (other minions, including
those of the acting minion's predator, could block, etc...). Was this
the correct analysis?
:D
Mike P.
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
LSJ
Yes.
--
LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) VTES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc.
Links to revised rulebook, rulings, errata, and tournament rules:
http://www.white-wolf.com/vtes/
cantila
LSJ <vte...@white-wolf.com> wrote:
> evilp...@my-deja.com wrote:
> > In a game last weekend, Rigby attempted to block my predator's
attempt
> > to equip Ian Wallingford(bishop) with a Writ of Acceptance, and
failed
> > to generate intercept. Ian was the only bishop controlled by my
> > predator, and had 2 blood.
> >
> > So. Does Rigby move a blood to Ian, or does the Writ action succeed
> > first? The table decided Rigby should move a blood, as the block
> > attempt fails before the action is successful (other minions,
> > including those of the acting minion's predator, could block,
etc...).
> > Was this the correct analysis?
>
> Yes.
>
What if he had failed to block, wwaked with another vamp and failed and
then drew an intercept and blocked with Rigby (siccessfully) again?
Would the blood then be moved back to him? Or if this is considered a
new block (but what if he had played a WWEF the first time around..and
based on that card he now played na intercept?)?
LSJ
> What if he had failed to block, wwaked with another vamp and failed and
> then drew an intercept and blocked with Rigby (siccessfully) again?
> Would the blood then be moved back to him? Or if this is considered a
> new block (but what if he had played a WWEF the first time around..and
> based on that card he now played na intercept?)?
Ribgy would only "fail to block" when her controller annouced "no more
block attempts".
--
LSJ (vte...@white-wolf.com) V:TES Net.Rep for White Wolf, Inc.
Derek Ray
wrote:
>cantila wrote:
>> What if he had failed to block, wwaked with another vamp and failed and
>> then drew an intercept and blocked with Rigby (siccessfully) again?
>> Would the blood then be moved back to him? Or if this is considered a
>> new block (but what if he had played a WWEF the first time around..and
>> based on that card he now played na intercept?)?
>
>Ribgy would only "fail to block" when her controller annouced "no more
>block attempts".
...Or when another vampire controlled by that same Methuselah
successfully blocked, after Rigby had previously announced an attempt
to block? =)
-- Derek
Goon-of-the-Month club member
LSJ
> LSJ <vte...@white-wolf.com> wrote:
>
> >cantila wrote:
> >> What if he had failed to block, wwaked with another vamp and failed and
> >> then drew an intercept and blocked with Rigby (siccessfully) again?
> >> Would the blood then be moved back to him? Or if this is considered a
> >> new block (but what if he had played a WWEF the first time around..and
> >> based on that card he now played na intercept?)?
> >
> >Ribgy would only "fail to block" when her controller annouced "no more
> >block attempts".
>
> ...Or when another vampire controlled by that same Methuselah
> successfully blocked, after Rigby had previously announced an attempt
> to block? =)
Right, my oversight. :-)